DocSend is solid for pitch deck sharing and document tracking. Plenty of startups use it for fundraising, and investors are familiar with the interface. The analytics are detailed, and the link-based sharing model works well.

We've been testing alternatives to DocSend for the past few months. The motivation was simple: different teams have different needs. Some need deeper virtual data room features for due diligence. Others want simpler analytics without per-user pricing. A few just need faster setup without the learning curve.

We personally tested 9 alternatives across various use cases: fundraising, investor updates, client proposals, and secure file sharing. Some tools focus heavily on analytics like DocSend does. Others strip away complexity and focus on speed. A few offer full virtual data room capabilities that go beyond basic document sharing.

Here's what we discovered. We'll cover pricing, features, who each tool serves best, and honest observations from our testing.

Key takeaways

Why look for a DocSend alternative?

DocSend handles pitch deck sharing and document tracking well. The page-by-page analytics give you clear insight into who viewed your deck and how long they spent on each slide. For fundraising, that's valuable data.

But DocSend isn't the only option, and it's not always the best fit for every team.

Better features for the price

Several alternatives offer comparable analytics with additional features at similar or lower costs. Some include virtual data room capabilities that DocSend doesn't emphasize. Others provide simpler interfaces that require less setup time.

We found tools that offer flat-rate pricing instead of per-user fees, which saves money as your team grows. Some alternatives include features like document creation or e-signatures that DocSend lacks entirely.

Different workflow needs

DocSend focuses specifically on secure sharing and analytics. That's great if you only need those features. But if you're also creating pitch decks, managing due diligence documents, or need integrated e-signature workflows, you might benefit from a more comprehensive platform.

Some teams need simpler tools without the learning curve. Others need deeper data room features for complex fundraising rounds. The right alternative depends on what you're actually trying to accomplish.

Cost considerations

DocSend's pricing can add up quickly for teams. The per-user model means costs scale directly with team size. We found alternatives with flat-rate pricing that make more sense for growing teams, and others with free tiers that work fine for occasional document sharing.

Transaction limits also matter. Some alternatives offer unlimited document sharing where DocSend caps certain features by plan tier. For high-volume users, this makes a real difference.

Quick comparison: DocSend alternatives at a glance

We tested each of these tools ourselves. Below, we'll break down what we found - the good, the specific use cases, and who each one works best for.

DocSend alternatives overview

Here are the best DocSend alternatives in 2026 for fundraising (in our opinion)

What are the best DocSend alternatives?

The best DocSend alternative depends on what you're actually trying to accomplish.

For most fundraising: Ellty gives you everything DocSend does - secure sharing, page-by-page analytics, real-time notifications - with faster setup and flat-rate pricing. Upload your deck, get a trackable link, see exactly who viewed what. No complexity, no per-user fees.

For document workflows: PandaDoc when you need more than just sharing. Create proposals, add e-signatures, collect payments, all in one place. Good for teams sending contracts and client documents alongside pitch decks. The analytics aren't as deck-focused, but the workflow coverage is broader.

Open-source route: Papermark if you want full control. Self-host for free, keep documents on your own infrastructure, customize everything. You manage the technical side yourself, but you own the data completely. Hosted version available if you want simplicity.

All-in-one deck creation: Pitch when you're building decks from scratch and want sharing built in. Real-time collaboration, professional templates, then share directly from the platform. Analytics are lighter than DocSend, but you're not jumping between tools.

Security-first approach: Digify when document control matters more than ease of use. Dynamic watermarking, screenshot prevention, access revocation. Takes longer to set up, costs more, but investors in sensitive industries expect this level of security.

Already using it anyway: Dropbox or Google Drive if you just need basic sharing without analytics. Everyone has these accounts already. No learning curve, no extra cost, but you won't know if anyone actually opened your deck or which slides they read.

Ongoing client work: Clinked when you're managing long-term relationships with multiple file exchanges. White-labeled portals, chat, tasks. Overkill for one-off pitch deck sharing, perfect for agencies or consultants with recurring client needs.

Bare minimum tracking: BriefLink when you only need to know if someone viewed your deck and which pages. $10/month, nothing fancy, but it answers the basic question: did they actually look at it?

Different needs, not better or worse. DocSend works well for what it does. These alternatives just handle different scenarios or priorities. Pick based on whether you need analytics depth, workflow breadth, cost control, or technical flexibility.

Types of DocSend alternatives

DocSend alternatives fall into different categories based on what they actually do.

Secure document sharing with analytics - The core DocSend model. Upload a file, share a trackable link, see who viewed what and for how long. Ellty, Papermark, and BriefLink follow this approach. You're tracking engagement, not building documents or managing complex workflows. Perfect for pitch decks, investor updates, and sales collateral where knowing "did they read it?" matters.

Document workflow platforms - More than just sharing. PandaDoc fits here. Create documents from scratch, add e-signatures, collect payments, then track everything. You're managing the entire document lifecycle in one place. Good when you need proposals, contracts, and pitch materials all handled through the same system.

Collaborative deck builders - Create and share without jumping between tools. Pitch does this. Build your presentation inside the platform with real-time team editing, then share it directly. The analytics are lighter, but you're not exporting from one tool and uploading to another.

Enterprise security platforms - When control matters more than convenience. Digify focuses here. Watermarking, screenshot prevention, remote access revocation, granular permissions. Setup takes longer, costs more, but you get security features that basic sharing tools don't offer. Built for sensitive documents where leaks have real consequences.

Universal file storage - General-purpose tools that happen to share files. Dropbox and Google Drive. Everyone already has them, they integrate with everything, but analytics are minimal or nonexistent. You can share a pitch deck through Drive, but you won't know if anyone actually opened it or which slides they saw.

Client portal systems - Ongoing workspace for relationships, not one-off shares. Clinked builds here. White-labeled portals with chat, file sharing, tasks, discussions. Overkill if you're just sending a deck to an investor. Perfect if you're an agency managing multiple clients with recurring document exchanges.

Minimalist trackers - Stripped-down analytics without the complexity. BriefLink is the example. Upload a PDF, get a link, see page views. No team features, no integrations, no learning curve. Answers one question: did they look at it?

Different problems, different tools. DocSend sits in the secure sharing category but leans toward fundraising use cases. These alternatives either do the same thing differently, or solve adjacent problems entirely. Pick based on whether you need tracking depth, document creation, workflow automation, or just simple file sharing.

The 9 best DocSend alternatives in 2026

1. Ellty - Fast pitch deck analytics and secure document sharing

G2: 4.8/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.7/5 ⭐

We tried Ellty early in our testing because we needed something that didn't require an hour of setup. Ellty offers pitch deck sharing, viewer analytics, and password protection features built specifically for fundraising and due diligence. What we appreciated most was how fast we could upload a deck, create a trackable link, and start seeing who viewed it.

Why founders love it

When we tested this with a sample pitch deck, the upload process took maybe two minutes. You drop in a PDF, create a link, and you're done. The analytics show exactly who clicked, which pages they spent time on, and when they viewed. You can also limit access to your files and slides with passwords. This matters when you're tracking investor interest and need to know if someone actually read your financials.

We found this particularly useful when testing the document sharing and tracking features. You can organize due diligence documents into folders, control who accesses what, and get notifications when someone views specific files. It's not as enterprise-heavy as some virtual data room platforms, which actually worked better for early-stage needs.

Founders we talked to mentioned the pricing structure. You're not paying per team member, which helps when you have multiple people managing fundraising or keeping investors engaged. The interface stays out of your way, which we appreciated during testing.

Best For: Founders who need quick pitch deck sharing with clear analytics and a straightforward confidential document tracking for due diligence.

Pricing: Free basic tier; Pro from $29/month (no per-user fees). We tested the Pro plan, which gave us unlimited decks and full analytics.

Support: Email and live chat support available. Documentation is clear and covers common fundraising scenarios.

"Setup took less than 5 minutes. The analytics are straightforward - I can see exactly which slides investors spent time on. No complexity, just what I need."

— Startup Founder, Seed Stage, G2

Try Ellty if you need pitch deck analytics without the usual setup time. You can test the free tier to see if the approach fits your workflow.

Ellty vs DocSend: key differences

The best DocSend alternative for venture

Ellty works best for venture capital firms and venture-backed startups who need professional document sharing without enterprise overhead.

Perfect for emerging managers. Ideal for startups who've outgrown free tools but can't stomach DocSend's pricing jumps.

Not trying to be everything to everyone.

2. PandaDoc - Document workflow automation with tracking

G2: 4.7/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.5/5 ⭐ | Trustpilot: 4.2/5 ⭐

PandaDoc goes beyond document sharing into full document creation and workflow automation. We tested this when we needed to see how it handles proposals and contracts, not just pitch decks. The platform includes document builders, e-signature capabilities, and approval workflows.

Why sales teams love it

When we tested the proposal workflow, PandaDoc handled everything from creation to signature in one place. You're not just sharing a document, you're building it inside the platform using templates. For sales teams sending the same proposal structure repeatedly, this saves hours.

The tracking shows when someone opens your document, how long they spend on each section, and when they sign. We noticed this works better for contracts and proposals than it does for pitch decks. The document editor is robust but adds complexity you might not need if you're only sharing PDFs.

In our testing, the approval workflows stood out. You can route documents through internal approvals before they go to clients. This matters for teams where legal or management needs to review before sending.

Best For: Sales teams and agencies that need document creation, e-signatures, and approval workflows in one platform.

Pricing: Starts at $19/user/month for the Essentials plan; Business plan at $49/user/month includes advanced analytics. We tested the Business plan.

Support: 24/7 chat and email support. The knowledge base is extensive, though you'll need it because the feature set is deep.

"We create proposals in PandaDoc now instead of Word docs. The templates and e-signature feature cut our sales cycle by days."

— Sales Director, Mid-Market Company, Capterra

PandaDoc vs DocSend: key differences

The best all-in-one document platform alternative to DocSend

Sales teams who need proposals, contracts, and signatures in one workflow. Agencies creating custom documents for every client. Companies tired of jumping between Google Docs, DocSend, and DocuSign just to close one deal.

Perfect if you've ever thought "why am I using three different tools just to get a signature" while managing your document process.

3. Papermark - Open-source document sharing with privacy focus

G2: 4.6/5 ⭐ | Product Hunt: 4.8/5 ⭐

We tested Papermark because it's one of the few open-source alternatives in this space. You can self-host if you need full control over your data, or use their hosted version. The focus is on privacy and giving you ownership of your analytics data.

Why technical founders love it

When we tried the self-hosted version, setup required some technical knowledge. You're deploying it yourself, which means you control everything about how it runs. For founders who care about data privacy or need to comply with specific regulations, this matters.

The hosted version works like any other document sharing tool. Upload a file, create a link, see who viewed it. The analytics are clean but not as detailed as DocSend. You get viewer counts, time spent, and basic engagement metrics.

We found this particularly useful when testing with sensitive documents. Since you can self-host, the documents never touch third-party servers if you don't want them to. The trade-off is maintenance and technical overhead.

Best For: Technical founders who want open-source flexibility or need self-hosted document sharing for compliance or privacy reasons.

Pricing: Free for self-hosted; Cloud version starts at $29/month. The pricing model is flexible and transparent.

Support: Community support through GitHub, documentation is solid for technical users. Email support available for cloud version.

"Being able to self-host was critical for us. We handle sensitive IP, and keeping documents on our infrastructure removed compliance concerns."

— CTO, Series A Startup, Product Hunt

Papermark vs DocSend: key differences

For a detailed comparison, check out our Papermark vs DocSend breakdown.

The best open-source DocSend alternative

Technical teams who value control over convenience. Companies with strict data residency requirements. Startups with more engineering time than budget.

4. Pitch - Modern pitch deck creation with built-in sharing

G2: 4.6/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.5/5 ⭐

Pitch combines deck creation with sharing and analytics. We tested this when we wanted to see how well an all-in-one approach works. You build your deck inside Pitch using their templates, then share it directly from the platform.

Why design-focused teams love it

When we tested the deck builder, Pitch felt more like a design tool than a document sharing platform. The templates are polished, and you can customize everything about your deck's appearance. For teams that don't use design tools like Figma or don't want to start from PowerPoint, this works well.

The collaboration features stood out in our testing. Multiple people can edit the same deck simultaneously, similar to Google Slides. This matters for teams where content, design, and data people all need to contribute.

In our experience, the analytics are lighter than DocSend. You see who viewed your deck and basic engagement metrics, but not the deep page-by-page analysis. The trade-off is having creation and sharing in one place.

Best For: Teams that need both deck creation and sharing, especially those who value design and collaborative editing.

Pricing: Free for basic features; Pro from $8/user/month; Business from $20/user/month. We tested the Pro plan, which includes unlimited decks and basic analytics.

Support: Email and chat support. The help center focuses heavily on deck design and best practices.

"We switched from PowerPoint to Pitch. The templates alone saved us hours, and sharing is built right in. No more export-upload workflow."

— Marketing Director, Growth Stage Startup, G2

Pitch vs DocSend: key differences

The best deck-builder-with-sharing alternative to DocSend

Design-focused teams who build decks from scratch regularly. Startups where multiple people collaborate on presentations. Companies that want real-time editing without the PowerPoint-to-DocSend export dance.

Perfect if you've ever thought "I wish I could just edit and share in the same place" while rebuilding your deck for the fifth time.

Perfect if you've ever thought "I could build this myself" while using DocSend.

5. Digify - Enterprise data room security with granular controls

G2: 4.5/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.4/5 ⭐

Digify focuses on enterprise-level security for document sharing and virtual data rooms. We tested this when we needed to see how the security features compare to simpler tools. Watermarking, document expiration, and granular permissions are the main differentiators.

Why compliance-focused companies love it

When we tested the watermarking feature, every page of the document displayed the viewer's email address. This discourages unauthorized sharing because recipients know their identity is tied to the file. For legal documents or M&A due diligence, this matters.

The permission controls are more detailed than most alternatives. You can set expiration dates, limit downloads, prevent printing, and revoke access at any time. We found this useful when testing scenarios where document control needs to be tight.

In our testing, setup takes longer than simpler tools. You're configuring security policies, not just uploading and sharing. The interface reflects this complexity, which makes sense given the target use case.

Best For: Companies handling M&A, legal due diligence, or any situation where document security and audit trails are non-negotiable.

Pricing: Starts at $83/month for teams; Enterprise plans available with custom pricing. We tested the Team plan.

Support: Email and priority support for higher tiers. Security documentation is thorough.

"The watermarking and access controls give us confidence when sharing confidential M&A documents. Audit logs are detailed enough for compliance."

— Legal Operations, Enterprise Company, Capterra

Digify vs DocSend: key differences

For a detailed comparison, check out our Digify vs DocSend breakdown.

The best enterprise security alternative to DocSend

Legal teams handling M&A documents. Companies in regulated industries with compliance requirements. Startups sharing IP or financials where document leaks have serious consequences.

Perfect if you've ever thought "I need more control than a password-protected link" while sending sensitive documents to investors or acquirers.

6. Dropbox - Universal file storage with basic sharing analytics

G2: 4.2/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.5/5 ⭐ | Trustpilot: 1.8/5 ⭐

Dropbox is file storage first, document sharing second. We included this because many teams already use it and wonder if they need a separate tool. The answer depends on what analytics you need.

Why teams already using Dropbox consider it

When we tested Dropbox for pitch deck sharing, the analytics were minimal. On paid plans, you can see how many times a link was accessed, but not who viewed it or which pages they saw. For casual sharing, this works fine. For fundraising or sales tracking, it doesn't.

The advantage is everyone already knows how Dropbox works. There's no learning curve, and most people already have it. We found this useful when testing with external stakeholders who didn't want to create yet another account.

In our experience, Dropbox makes sense for teams that need file storage anyway and only occasionally need to track document views. The analytics won't replace DocSend, but the convenience might matter more for your workflow.

Best For: Teams already using Dropbox who need basic file sharing with light tracking and don't want to add another tool.

Pricing: Free for personal use; Business plans from $9.99/user/month; Business Plus from $20/user/month includes basic analytics. We tested Business Plus.

Support: 24/7 support for business plans. The knowledge base is extensive but focuses on general file management.

"We use Dropbox for everything already. The link sharing works fine for client files. Not great for detailed tracking, but good enough for our needs."

— Operations Manager, Small Business, Capterra

Dropbox vs DocSend: key differences

The best "we already use it" alternative to DocSend

Teams who need file storage anyway and only occasionally share pitch decks. Companies where everyone already has Dropbox accounts. Startups that don't need detailed analytics, just simple file sharing.

Perfect if you've ever thought "why am I paying for another tool when we already have Dropbox" while managing your subscription stack.

7. Clinked - White-label client portals with document sharing

G2: 4.7/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.8/5 ⭐

Clinked is less about one-off document sharing and more about creating branded client portals. We tested this when we needed to see how it handles ongoing client relationships with multiple file exchanges.

Why agencies and consultants love it

When we tested the portal setup, you're building an entire branded workspace for each client. They log in to see their files, messages, tasks, and updates all in one place. This works better for agencies managing multiple clients over time than for one-off pitch deck shares.

The document sharing is embedded in a larger collaboration context. You can discuss files in threaded conversations, assign tasks, and keep everything client-specific in one portal. We found this useful when testing scenarios with ongoing client work.

In our testing, the white-labeling stood out. Your clients see your brand, your domain, your logo. They don't know you're using Clinked unless you tell them. This matters for professional service firms where brand consistency is important.

Best For: Agencies, consultants, and professional services firms that manage ongoing client relationships and need branded workspaces.

Pricing: Starts at $83/month for 50 users; scales up based on user count. We tested the standard plan.

Support: Email and live chat support. Onboarding help is available because setup requires configuring your branding and structure.

"Our clients love having a dedicated portal instead of email attachments everywhere. The white-labeling makes it feel like our own platform."

— Agency Owner, Marketing Agency, G2

Clinked vs DocSend: key differences

The best client portal alternative to DocSend

Agencies managing multiple clients with recurring document exchanges. Consultants who need branded workspaces for ongoing relationships. Professional services firms where file sharing is part of a larger collaboration workflow.

Perfect if you've ever thought "I need more than just document sharing, I need a whole client workspace" while managing scattered communications across email and file links.

8. Google Drive - Simple file sharing everyone already has

G2: 4.6/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.7/5 ⭐

Google Drive is free, everyone has it, and it works for basic file sharing. We included this because it's the most common answer to "why not just use what we already have?"

Why teams use it despite limitations

When we tested Google Drive for pitch deck sharing, the experience is straightforward. Upload a PDF, create a shareable link, send it. You can set view-only permissions and require sign-in if needed. What you don't get is any insight into who actually looked at it.

The advantage is zero friction. No one needs to create an account or learn a new tool. We found this useful when testing with recipients who were non-technical or resistant to new platforms.

In our experience, Google Drive works for internal sharing or casual external sharing. It doesn't work when you need to know if an investor actually opened your deck or which slides they focused on. For fundraising specifically, the lack of analytics is a real limitation.

Best For: Teams that need simple file sharing without analytics, or for internal collaboration where tracking isn't necessary.

Pricing: Free for personal use; Business Standard from $6/user/month includes more storage and admin controls. Most teams use the free version.

Support: Community forums for free users; business plans include email support.

"We use Google Drive for everything internal. For investor decks though, we switched to a dedicated tool because we needed to see who viewed what."

— Founder, Pre-Seed Startup, Google Play Reviews

Google Drive vs DocSend: key differences

The best free-and-universal alternative to DocSend

Casual users who share documents occasionally. Startups with zero budget for tools. Teams where friction-free sharing matters more than tracking who viewed what.

Perfect if you've ever thought "I just need to send this file, not build a whole tracking system" while considering paid document sharing platforms.

9. BriefLink - Minimalist link tracking for documents

Product Hunt: 4.5/5 ⭐

BriefLink strips away everything except basic document sharing and page-by-page analytics. We tested this last because it represents the opposite of feature-heavy platforms.

Why minimalists appreciate it

When we tested BriefLink, the entire workflow took under a minute. Upload a PDF, get a link, done. The analytics show which pages were viewed and for how long. Nothing more, nothing less.

The interface is intentionally sparse. There are no team features, no virtual data rooms, no permission hierarchies. This works for solo founders or small teams who just need to know if someone read their deck.

In our testing, the $10/month pricing for unlimited documents and basic analytics is the draw. You're not getting enterprise features, but you're also not paying for them. For early-stage founders watching every expense, this matters.

Best For: Solo founders or small teams who need basic page-by-page analytics without any additional features or cost.

Pricing: Free tier available; Pro from $10/month for unlimited documents and detailed analytics. We tested the Pro plan.

Support: Email support, minimal documentation because the tool is intentionally simple.

"I don't need all the features of expensive platforms. BriefLink gives me page views and timing. That's enough for my seed raise."

— Solo Founder, Product Hunt

BriefLink vs DocSend: key differences

The best minimalist alternative to DocSend

Solo founders tracking investor deck views. Bootstrapped startups watching every dollar. Anyone who only needs one feature: did they actually read my deck?

Perfect if you've ever thought "DocSend has too many features I'll never use" while looking at pricing pages for document sharing tools.

How we chose which DocSend alternative to recommend

After testing all these alternatives, here's what we'd consider if we were choosing for our own business:

Your use case matters most. Are you fundraising and need detailed investor tracking? Ellty or DocSend make sense. Sending client proposals with e-signatures? PandaDoc handles that better. Need ongoing client collaboration? Clinked builds entire portals. If you're just sharing files internally, Google Drive or Dropbox probably work fine.

Budget and team size change the math. Per-user pricing adds up fast. DocSend at $50 per user per month costs $500/month for a 10-person team. Flat-rate tools like Ellty or BriefLink don't scale that way. We found that for small teams under five people, per-user pricing isn't terrible. Above that, flat rates save money.

Technical requirements narrow options. Do you need integrations with your CRM? PandaDoc and Dropbox have extensive integration ecosystems. Need to self-host for compliance? Papermark is your only real option in this list. Most tools work fine with basic email workflows, but if you're automating document processes, integration support matters.

Analytics needs vary widely. If you're fundraising, analytics like "which investor spent three minutes on your financials slide" help you follow up strategically. We found Ellty and DocSend offer the most detailed tracking here. If you're just sharing client files and don't need viewer insights, simpler tools like Google Drive or Dropbox suffice.

Support and reliability matter when you're on a deadline. Some tools took hours to set up and required support tickets. Others worked immediately. We tested support by asking questions during business hours. Response times ranged from minutes to days depending on the platform and plan tier.

Common questions about DocSend alternatives (From our testing)

What is DocSend best known for?

DocSend is best known for secure document sharing with detailed analytics, particularly for pitch decks and investor relations. They pioneered link-based sharing with page-by-page tracking, showing exactly who viewed your document and how long they spent on each page. In our testing, DocSend excels at giving founders visibility into investor engagement during fundraising.

Why do businesses look for DocSend alternatives?

From talking to founders and our own testing, the main reasons are pricing structure and feature needs. DocSend's per-user model gets expensive for larger teams. Some businesses need simpler tools without the learning curve. Others need deeper virtual data room features for due diligence that go beyond basic sharing. A few just want comparable analytics without the brand recognition premium.

Are these alternatives cheaper than DocSend?

It depends on your needs and team size. DocSend starts at $50 per user per month. Tools like BriefLink ($10/month) or Ellty ($29/month flat rate) cost less for small teams. Enterprise-focused options like Digify or Clinked start around $83/month but include more users in the base price. We found that pricing varies significantly based on whether you're paying per-user or a flat team rate, and how many documents you share monthly.

Which alternative is best for early-stage startups?

For early-stage needs like fundraising with limited budget, we'd look at Ellty for the flat pricing and quick setup, or BriefLink if you only need basic analytics. Google Drive works if you don't need tracking at all. Pitch makes sense if you're building decks from scratch and want templates. The key is matching the tool to whether you need detailed analytics, which matters more during fundraising than for general file sharing.

Do I need a virtual data room for fundraising?

In our experience testing these for fundraising scenarios, you don't need a full VDR for initial pitch deck sharing. A tool with good analytics like Ellty or DocSend works fine. You do need VDR features when you reach due diligence and investors start requesting financial records, legal documents, and sensitive company information. At that stage, the folder organization, access controls, and audit trails of a proper data room become important.

Can I switch from DocSend to another tool easily?

Based on our testing, switching is straightforward for most alternatives. DocSend doesn't lock up your files, you can download them and upload to a new platform. The challenge is migrating your analytics history and existing shared links. We tested migration with Ellty and found the actual document transfer takes minutes. You'll need to create new trackable links though, which means updating any links you've already shared with investors or clients.

What's the difference between DocSend and PandaDoc?

Having tested both, here's what we noticed: DocSend focuses on sharing and tracking existing documents, particularly controlling PDFs. PandaDoc is built for creating documents inside the platform, then sharing them with e-signature workflows. DocSend is better for pitch decks and one-way sharing with analytics. PandaDoc is better for proposals, contracts, and documents that need signatures. Different needs, not better or worse.

Which alternative has the best analytics?

From our testing, Ellty and DocSend offer the most detailed analytics with page-by-page tracking and viewer identification. PandaDoc tracks engagement but focuses more on document completion. Papermark and BriefLink offer simpler page-view analytics. Dropbox and Google Drive barely have analytics at all. If tracking investor or client engagement is critical, stick with tools built specifically for that purpose.

Cheapest DocSend alternatives

If you're watching costs carefully, several low-price alternatives offer solid document sharing and basic analytics:

1. Ellty

At $29/month flat rate (no per-user fees), Ellty offers more features than BriefLink at roughly the same cost as DocSend for a three-person team. You get detailed page-by-page analytics, professional features for due diligence, and real-time notifications when investors view your deck.

The value shows up when your team grows, and your pitch deck stays protected. DocSend's per-user pricing means $50/month becomes $150/month with three users. Ellty stays at $29/month regardless of team size. The analytics are comparable to DocSend, setup takes under five minutes, and you're not paying more as you add team members.

2. BriefLink

At $10/month for unlimited documents, BriefLink is the most affordable option we tested. You get basic page-by-page analytics and sharing links. No team features, no virtual data room, but for solo founders tracking investor engagement, it works.

The interface is bare-bones by design. Upload a PDF, get a link, see who viewed which pages. That's it. If you need more features, you'll need to look elsewhere, but you won't find a cheaper way to track pitch deck views.

3. Google Drive

Free for basic use, Google Drive with Business Standard at $6/user/month is hard to beat on price. The catch: you get almost no analytics. You can see if someone opened a file, but not which pages they viewed or how long they spent reading.

Good enough for internal sharing or casual document distribution. Not good enough for fundraising where you need to know if an investor actually read your financials.

4. Papermark

The open-source option. Free if you self-host, or $29/month for their hosted version. You get basic document sharing and page-view analytics without the DocSend price tag.

Papermark's self-hosted option appeals to technical founders who want data ownership. The hosted version works like any other document sharing tool. Analytics are simpler than DocSend, but adequate for most needs.

Our final thoughts on DocSend alternatives

After weeks of testing these tools, the landscape of options surprised us. There's no single tool that handles every use case perfectly. DocSend remains solid for detailed pitch deck analytics, but these alternatives serve different needs just as well.

We found Ellty great for fundraising and nonprofit teams who want quick setup and clear analytics without per-user fees, while PandaDoc suited sales teams who need document creation and e-signatures in one place. Papermark worked for technical founders who wanted data ownership. Pitch handled the all-in-one creation and sharing approach well.

Choose based on your actual needs. Are you tracking investor engagement during fundraising? Analytics-focused tools matter. Sending contracts that need signatures? Document workflow platforms make more sense. Just sharing files with basic tracking? Simpler and cheaper tools work fine.

Whether you go with Ellty for straightforward pitch deck analytics, and secure file sharing, or Digify for enterprise security, or even just stick with Google Drive for casual sharing, pick what actually solves your problems. The tool matters less than using it consistently and following up with the people who view your documents.

If you have questions about specific use cases or want details on features we didn't cover, most of these platforms offer free trials. Test them with your actual documents and see what fits your workflow.

Test before committing

Every platform offers trials. Upload real documents. Run a mock process. Check if your team can actually use it without training.

The best alternative is one your team will actually adopt.

Disclaimer

Parties other than Ellty may provide products, services, recommendations, or views on this site ("Third Party Materials"). Ellty is not responsible for examining or evaluating such Third Party Materials, and does not provide any warranties relating to the Third Party Materials. Links to such Third Party Materials are for your convenience and does not constitute an endorsement of such Third Party Materials.