Papermark vs DocSend hero

Papermark vs DocSend - Comparing free and paid document tracking

AvatarEllty HQ18 August 2025

Internal team behind the product.


BlogPapermark vs DocSend - Comparing free and paid document tracking

Papermark emerged when developers wanted an alternative to DocSend's pricing model.

Open source document tracking. Free tier with 50 documents. Self-hosting option available. Created by a team building in public on GitHub.

DocSend remains the market leader. Established platform. Dropbox backing. Enterprise features refined over a decade.

Let's compare what each offers and where they differ.


The Core Distinction

DocSend operates as a traditional SaaS platform. Polished interface, enterprise features, reliable infrastructure. You pay monthly fees but get a proven solution.

Docsend


Papermark follows the open source model. Community-driven development. Transparent roadmap. Multiple deployment options including self-hosting. Free tier for basic needs.

Papermark


Both solve document tracking. Different approaches to the same problem.


Looking for document tracking software?

Docsend alternative


You need to track documents. See who's reading. Know when to follow up.

DocSend charges from day one. Papermark requires technical setup for self-hosting.

Ellty gives you professional tracking immediately. Free tier with 50 documents. Set up in minutes. No technical knowledge needed.

Plus features neither competitor offers: investor email finder, team collaboration tools, simpler interface.


Share and track your documents free


Feature-by-feature breakdown

Document Analytics

Both platforms track:

  • Who viewed your document
  • Time on each page
  • Total visits and downloads
  • Geographic location
  • Device type

DocSend's enterprise extras:

Visitor identification links views to specific people when possible. Team dashboards show company-wide sharing patterns. Viewer profiles track engagement history across multiple documents.

Advanced controls include dynamic watermarking, conditional access forms, and granular permission rules.

Papermark's focused approach:

Anonymous but detailed tracking. You see "Visitor from San Francisco spent 8 minutes on pricing." That's enough to know they're interested.

Essential controls work perfectly. Password protection, expiration dates, download blocking. No feature bloat.

Real difference:

Send a pitch deck to investors.

DocSend might identify specific partners and show their viewing patterns across your documents. Complex but powerful for enterprise sales.

Papermark shows engagement metrics without personal identification. Simpler, privacy-friendly, tells you what you need to know.

Both deliver actionable intelligence. Choose based on how much detail you actually use.


Pricing structure

DocSend pricing:

Docsend pricing
  • Personal: $15/user/month
  • Standard: $65/user/month
  • Advanced: $250/month (minimum 3 users)
  • No free tier

Papermark pricing:

Papermark pricing page


  • Free: 50 documents/month
  • Pro: $29/user/month
  • Team: $49/user/month
  • Self-hosted: Free (your infrastructure)

For a 5-person team, annual costs:

  • DocSend Standard: $3,900
  • Papermark Pro: $1,740
  • Difference: $2,160


Control and deployment

DocSend provides full managed service. Your documents upload to their servers. They handle security, updates, and infrastructure. Standard SaaS convenience.

Papermark offers flexibility. Use their cloud service (similar to DocSend) or download the code and run your own instance. Complete control over your data if you need it.

Self-hosting appeals to companies with strict data residency requirements or those wanting to avoid vendor dependencies.


Where each platform excels

DocSend

Enterprise polish. Ten years of refinement shows. Every feature thoroughly tested. Edge cases handled.

Integrations. Native Salesforce connection. Slack notifications. HubSpot sync. Built over years of enterprise requests.

Support infrastructure. Dedicated success teams for large accounts. SLAs. 24/7 availability on higher tiers.

Virtual data rooms. Complex permission structures for due diligence. Watermarking. Advanced access controls.

Papermark

Cost efficiency. Free tier handles many use cases. Paid plans cost less than DocSend equivalents.

Open development. See the roadmap. Request features. Contribute code. Fix bugs yourself if needed.

Data sovereignty. Host in your preferred region. Keep sensitive documents on your infrastructure. Comply with local regulations.

Simplicity. Fewer features can mean easier adoption. Does what most teams need without complexity.


Real user perspectives

"Switched from DocSend to save money. Papermark does 90% of what we need at 40% of the cost" - startup founder on ProductHunt

"DocSend just works. Yes it's expensive but we've never had issues in 3 years" - sales director on G2

"Self-hosting Papermark gave us the control we needed for compliance. Took a day to set up" - IT manager on GitHub discussions


Try other options

Ellty analytics


While Papermark and DocSend represent different philosophies, other tools blend approaches differently.

Ellty, for instance, sits between them. Not open source like Papermark, but offers a generous free tier. Not as expensive as DocSend, but includes features like investor email finding that neither competitor offers.

The document tracking space has room for different solutions serving different priorities.


Share and track documents free


Making your choice

Choose DocSend when:

  • Budget isn't primary concern
  • You need enterprise features today
  • Integration ecosystem matters
  • You want proven stability

Choose Papermark when:

  • Cost consciousness drives decisions
  • Open source philosophy aligns with your values
  • Self-hosting provides necessary control
  • Core features suffice

Consider alternatives when:

  • You need specific features neither provides
  • Your use case falls between their offerings
  • Regional requirements demand local solutions


The Verdict

Papermark proves you don't need venture funding and premium pricing to build solid document tracking. The open source approach works for teams wanting transparency and control.

DocSend demonstrates the value of focused development and enterprise polish. The higher price includes reliability and comprehensive features.

Neither is inherently better. Your priorities determine the right choice.

But if you want the best of both worlds - professional features like DocSend, fair pricing like Papermark, plus unique capabilities neither offers - Ellty bridges that gap. Free tier to start. No technical setup required. Investor database included.

Test all options with real documents. Papermark's free tier removes barriers. DocSend's trial lets you explore advanced features. Ellty's free plan gives you 50 documents to see the difference.

Your workflow will reveal which fits. The best tool is the one your team actually uses.


Try Ellty for free


FAQs

Is Papermark really free?
The community edition is free forever with 50 documents monthly. Self-hosted version has no limits.

Can Papermark match DocSend's features?
Core tracking features yes. Advanced enterprise features like data rooms are still developing.

How difficult is self-hosting?
Basic technical knowledge required. Docker setup takes 30-60 minutes. Documentation is comprehensive.

Will DocSend's corporate backing matter?
Depends on your risk tolerance. Dropbox provides stability. Open source provides transparency.

Which has better security?
Both use industry-standard encryption. DocSend has more compliance certifications. Papermark lets you control the infrastructure.

tick mark
Link Copied
A link to this page has been copied to your clipboard!
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.