AI infrastructure funding split into two camps by 2025. Some investors chase every new GPU cloud startup promising cheaper H100s. Others only back companies with actual datacenter commitments and power allocations. The difference matters because compute margins compress fast when Nvidia controls supply and hyperscalers compete on price. If you're building training infrastructure, inference engines, or GPU orchestration platforms, you need investors who understand datacenter economics and chip allocation deals.
Andreessen Horowitz: Led CoreWeave's $1.1B Series C, understands GPU supply chains better than most enterprise VCs
Bessemer Venture Partners: Backed Anyscale through Series C, knows distributed systems and won't confuse training with inference economics
Coatue: Late investor in Together AI, moved fast from LLMs into infrastructure when margins became clear
Databricks Ventures: Corporate investor in MosaicML before $1.3B acquisition, strategic for data platform integration
Felicis: Early backer of Modal and Replicate, responds quickly and understands developer-focused infrastructure
General Catalyst: Led Crusoe Energy's Series C at $3B valuation, gets power and cooling economics for GPU datacenters
Google Ventures: Backed Lambda Labs early, useful for GCP partnerships but expects cloud integration
Greylock Partners: Multi-round investor in Coreweave, strong balance sheet for capital-intensive infrastructure deals
Index Ventures: European base with US presence, funded Weaviate and understands vector infrastructure economics
Innovation Endeavors: Backed Groq and other AI chip startups, Eric Schmidt's network opens hardware partnerships
Intel Capital: Strategic investor in Groq and SambaNova, valuable for chip roadmap access but expects Intel alignment
Kleiner Perkins: Led Figure AI's Series B at $2.6B valuation, back in infrastructure after missing cloud wave
Lightspeed Venture Partners: Invested in Crusoe and Lambda, understands power purchase agreements for datacenters
Lux Capital: Deep tech focus with investments in Rain AI and other chip companies, longer timelines than software VCs
Mayfield Fund: Backed Lambda Labs Series C, enterprise connections for on-prem GPU deployments
NVIDIA (NVentures): Strategic investor with obvious chip access benefits but slow investment process
Sequoia Capital: Led Groq's funding rounds, hardest meetings to get but best for follow-on capital
Thrive Capital: Backed Together AI and OpenAI infrastructure, strong concentration in AI stack
Tiger Global: Growth investor in CoreWeave and Lambda, moves fast but expects clear path to $100M ARR
Valor Equity Partners: SpaceX and Tesla investor now funding AI infrastructure, deep pockets for capital-intensive builds
Experience: Find investors who've backed companies through GPU shortages and know why H100 allocation matters more than pricing promises. Ask their portfolio companies about help during chip supply negotiations. Check if they understand the difference between training clusters and inference deployments without asking their analysts.
Network: You need intros to datacenter operators, power providers, and chip distributors - not generic cloud contacts. Investors with portfolio companies at CoreWeave, Lambda, or Crusoe can open doors to colocation facilities and power purchase agreements. That matters more than connections to AWS account managers.
Alignment: Make sure they've funded capital-intensive infrastructure before. Software VCs don't understand why you need $50M just to build out your first datacenter pod. Seed investors often don't understand gross margins on GPU rentals vary by 40 points between inference and training workloads.
Track record: Look at whether their AI infrastructure portfolio companies actually deployed GPUs or just raised on promises. Dead compute companies that never secured chip allocation are red flags. Check if their investments survived the 2023 GPU shortage or collapsed waiting for hardware.
Communication: Use Ellty to share your deck with trackable links. You'll see who actually opens your datacenter buildout slides vs. just skimming the market size. If investors skip your power and cooling architecture, they probably don't understand the operational complexity.
Value-add: Ask what support they provide during chip allocation negotiations and datacenter lease discussions. Generic "we have great relationships with cloud providers" means nothing. You need investors who can intro you to Nvidia partners, datacenter operators with power capacity, or enterprises doing on-prem deployments.
Identify potential investors: Research recent deals on Pitchbook for GPU clouds, model training platforms, and inference infrastructure from 2024-2025. Software-focused seed funds won't understand your datacenter CapEx needs. Check which firms have infrastructure partners who've backed previous compute companies vs. generalists riding the AI wave.
Craft your pitch: Show GPU utilization rates, power costs per kilowatt-hour, and gross margins on training vs. inference. Most investors are tired of "we're 10x cheaper than AWS" claims without explaining chip allocation deals or why customers would migrate production workloads.
Share your pitch deck: Upload to Ellty and send trackable links. Monitor which pages investors spend time on. If they skip your datacenter economics slide but read your team page three times, they're not serious about infrastructure. You'll know who understands CapEx requirements vs. who's just taking meetings.
Use your network: Message founders at CoreWeave, Lambda, or Together AI on LinkedIn and ask about their fundraising process. Most will be honest about which investors understand datacenter operations vs. who wanted software economics. Look for warm intros through other infrastructure CEOs or datacenter operators.
Attend the right events: GTC (Nvidia's conference), OCP Summit, and AI Infrastructure Alliance events are where deals happen. Skip generic AI conferences full of LLM app developers. Most infrastructure investors attend datacenter industry events like DatacenterDynamics or 7x24 Exchange. Avoid broad GDPR mistakes when you need targeted engagement.
Engage strategically online: Connect with partners on LinkedIn after they've engaged with infrastructure content or you've been introduced. Cold messages about "revolutionary GPU technology" get ignored. Share technical content on distributed training, inference optimization, or power efficiency - infrastructure investors follow these topics. Just ensure your shared resources use proper screenshot protection when needed.
Organize due diligence early: Set up an Ellty data room with your datacenter lease agreements, power purchase contracts, and chip allocation commitments before they ask. Pre-organized materials dramatically speed up diligence, especially when investors want to confirm you prevent PDF forwarding in sensitive files. Most infrastructure investors want to see your deals with Nvidia partners, colocation providers, and your cooling architecture.
Lead with differentiation: Start meetings with your chip allocation status and datacenter capacity - not your API pricing. Don't waste 15 minutes on AI market size slides they've seen from 50 other GPU companies. Show your utilization economics and explain why your gross margins will hold when hyperscalers drop prices.
The infrastructure layer consolidated around companies with actual GPU access and datacenter capacity. Paper launches of GPU clouds without chip commitments stopped getting funded in 2024. CoreWeave's IPO at $19B in late 2024 proved infrastructure economics work at scale.
Investors backing AI infrastructure in 2026 focus on companies with secured chip allocations, power capacity over 50MW, and enterprise contracts beyond startups. Generic "GPU as a service" won't get funded unless you show utilization above 70% and gross margins over 50% on inference workloads.
Large VC with dedicated AI infrastructure practice and track record funding capital-intensive compute companies.
Enterprise software investor that moved into AI infrastructure with distributed systems expertise.
Technology investor focused on infrastructure with fast decision-making on AI compute deals.
Corporate VC that acquired MosaicML for $1.3B, strategic for data platform integration.
Early-stage VC known for developer tools and infrastructure with rapid response times.
Multi-stage firm with infrastructure focus, understands power and datacenter economics.
Strategic investor with Google Cloud alignment but slower processes than independent VCs.
Infrastructure-focused VC with deep pockets for capital-intensive datacenter builds.
European VC with US presence, strong in developer infrastructure across both markets.
Eric Schmidt's VC firm focused on deep tech and AI hardware with strong industry connections.
Corporate VC with strategic value through chip ecosystem and hardware partnerships.
Storied VC firm re-entering infrastructure after early cloud investments, funding AI compute now.
Multi-stage VC with infrastructure experience and datacenter industry connections.
Deep tech investor comfortable with long development cycles and hardware complexity.
Enterprise infrastructure investor with connections for on-premise GPU deployments.
Corporate VC arm with obvious chip access benefits but expects ecosystem alignment.
Top-tier VC with best follow-on funding but hardest initial access for infrastructure founders.
Growth-stage investor concentrated in AI infrastructure with OpenAI connections.
Growth investor moving fast on infrastructure deals with clear revenue trajectories.
Late-stage investor from SpaceX and Tesla backing capital-intensive AI infrastructure.
These 20 investors closed AI infrastructure deals from 2023 to 2025. Before you contact them, understand that most won't respond if you can't show chip allocations or datacenter commitments.
Upload your deck to Ellty and create unique trackable links for each investor. You'll see exactly which slides they view and how long they spend on your datacenter economics vs. your team page. Most infrastructure founders are surprised when investors skip technical architecture but spend 10 minutes on gross margin breakdowns and customer contracts. If someone views your deck but ignores your power and cooling slides, they don't understand datacenter operations.
When investors ask for diligence materials, share an Ellty data room instead of scattered Google Drive folders. Your chip allocation agreements, datacenter lease contracts, power purchase agreements, and customer pipeline in one place with view tracking. You'll know when they're actually reviewing your deals with Nvidia partners vs. just scheduling follow-up calls.
How do I know if an AI infrastructure investor understands datacenter economics?
Ask them about their portfolio companies' GPU utilization rates and power costs. If they can't discuss PUE (Power Usage Effectiveness) or don't know typical datacenter lease terms, they're not infrastructure-focused. Check if they've backed companies that actually deployed hardware vs. just raised on promises.
What's the minimum datacenter capacity investors expect?
For seed rounds, you don't need capacity yet but should have term sheets from colocation providers. Series A investors want commitments for 5-10MW. Series B and beyond expect 50MW+ capacity or clear expansion plans. Don't claim datacenter plans without signed agreements.
Should I target corporate VCs like Nvidia or independent funds?
Corporate VCs like Nvidia or Intel Capital help with chip allocation but move slower and expect ecosystem alignment. Independent VCs like Andreessen Horowitz or Sequoia move faster but can't guarantee hardware access. Most infrastructure companies need both - corporate for strategic value, independent for lead rounds.
Do GPU cloud companies need as much capital as chip companies?
Yes, often more. Chip companies raise for R&D and tape-outs. GPU cloud companies need $100M+ just for datacenter buildouts, power infrastructure, and chip purchases. Plan for 18-24 month capital cycles because infrastructure can't be built incrementally like software.
When should I set up a data room for infrastructure deals?
Before your first partner meeting. Infrastructure diligence takes 6-8 weeks minimum because investors verify datacenter leases, power contracts, and chip allocations. Having an Ellty data room with all agreements ready speeds up closes by a month.
How do inference economics differ from training for investors?
Training infrastructure has 40-50% gross margins but lumpy revenue from research labs. Inference has 60-70% margins with recurring revenue from production deployments. Most investors prefer inference economics now that models are deployed at scale. Be clear which workload you're optimizing for.