Washington raised $4.8B across 280 deals in 2025. That's concentrated in Seattle and Bellevue with a few Spokane outliers. The ecosystem revolves around Amazon and Microsoft alumni who either start companies or fund them. You won't find the capital density of California, but you'll face less competition for attention.
Madrona Venture Group (Seattle): Led Highspot's $200M Series F for sales enablement in May 2025
Voyager Capital (Seattle): Backed Auth0's early rounds before $6.5B Okta acquisition, still active in identity
Founders' Co-op (Seattle): Seed investor in Remitly before $7B IPO, $500K-$2M checks locally
Fuse (Seattle): Former Ignition Partners team, backed Textio Series B at $58M valuation
Maveron (Seattle): Starbucks founder's VC firm, led Allbirds and Zulily before IPOs
Cascade Seed Fund (Seattle): Early-stage specialist, backed PicMonkey and Outreach.io seed rounds
Vulcan Capital (Seattle): Paul Allen's investment firm, $10B AUM across stages
Pioneer Square Labs (Seattle): Studio model, builds companies in-house then spins them out
Flying Fish Partners (Seattle): B2B SaaS only, backed Avalara pre-IPO rounds
OVP Venture Partners (Kirkland): Enterprise infrastructure focus, Qumulo Series D lead
Trilogy Equity Partners (Seattle): Growth equity for profitable PNW tech companies
Kick-Start Capital (Bellevue): Seed to Series A, $100M fund backing Pacific Northwest founders
Vanedge Capital (Vancouver/Seattle): Cross-border US-Canada fund with Seattle presence
Divergent Capital (Spokane): Eastern Washington's only active VC, backs B2B software
Freestone Capital Partners (Seattle): Late-stage and growth equity for established companies
Washington closed $4.8B in 2025 with 280 deals. That's 8% of California's volume but concentrated in fewer hands. Seattle has 35 active VC firms compared to 180+ in the Bay Area. The smaller ecosystem means less noise but fewer options if your first choices pass.
Microsoft and Amazon dominate the landscape. Half the local VCs are former MSFT or AMZN executives. They understand enterprise sales cycles and cloud infrastructure better than most coastal investors. If you're building B2B SaaS or developer tools, Washington investors get it immediately.
Average seed round is $2.1M, lower than California's $3.2M. Series A rounds hit $12M versus $18M in SF. Check sizes reflect the market. You'll raise less but burn less. Seattle engineering salaries are 20-30% lower than Bay Area. Your dollar goes further here.
The downside is limited late-stage capital. Most Series B and beyond rounds require bringing in California or East Coast investors. Local funds can't lead $50M+ rounds. Plan your cap table knowing you'll need to pitch Sand Hill Road eventually.
Geographic expectations: Washington investors expect you to be local or willing to relocate. Madrona and Fuse want quarterly in-person board meetings in Seattle. Remote companies can raise here, but it's harder. They've been burned by founders who took Washington seed money then moved to SF immediately.
Portfolio alignment: Check their last 15 investments. Madrona does enterprise infrastructure and B2B SaaS almost exclusively. Maveron focuses on consumer brands with offline components. Flying Fish won't look at anything except business software. Don't pitch consumer apps to enterprise-only funds. You'll waste three months learning they don't do your category.
Check size reality: Seed funds here write $500K-$2M checks. Madrona and Voyager lead Series A rounds at $8-15M. Nobody local leads $25M+ Series B rounds consistently. Match your raise to their typical deal size. If you need $20M Series A, you're bringing in out-of-state co-leads anyway.
Enterprise connections: The real value is Microsoft and Amazon intros. Madrona can get you meetings with Azure product managers. Voyager has relationships with AWS Marketplace team. These intros actually happen, not just promised. Washington investors built their careers at these companies. They still have the relationships.
Sharing your deck: Upload to Ellty and send unique tracking links to each Washington fund. You'll see which investors open your deck versus which ones sit on it for weeks. Seattle VCs are slower to respond than Bay Area investors. If they haven't opened your deck in five days, send a follow-up. The pace here is more methodical.
Follow-on limitations: Most Washington funds manage $100-300M. They can lead seed and Series A but struggle with Series B. Madrona has the capital for later rounds, but smaller funds don't. Ask explicitly about their follow-on capacity before taking their money. You don't want a cap table full of investors who can't participate in your next round.
Research local deals first: Check Pitchbook for Washington investments in the last six months. Filter by sector and stage. Download portfolio lists from fund websites. Map which founders at portfolio companies you can reach through LinkedIn. Warm intros matter more here than cold emails. The Seattle tech community is small enough that everyone knows everyone. So you need to protect your sensitive documents.
Use ecosystem infrastructure: Join the Alliance of Angels for angel investor access. Attend TechStars Seattle demo days if you're in the program. Pioneer Square Labs runs a studio model but also invests externally. Visit their office hours. UW CoMotion connects university spinouts with local capital. These programs have direct relationships with every major Washington fund. Keep your shared materials locked down with proper password protection when swapping early versions of your deck.
Build relationships slowly: Washington investors take longer to decide than California VCs. Plan six touchpoints over four months before expecting a term sheet. First meeting is exploration. Second meeting is early product demo. Third meeting shows traction update. Fourth is partner meeting. Fifth is reference calls. Sixth is term sheet negotiation. Trying to rush this process gets you rejected.
Share trackable materials: Upload your deck to Ellty before sending to Washington VCs. Create unique links for each fund so you track who views it and which slides they study. Seattle investors typically review decks within 2-3 days. That's slower than SF's 24-hour turnaround but faster than East Coast. If they haven't opened it in a week, they're not interested but too polite to say so.
Attend regional events: GeekWire Summit brings 150+ local investors every October. Seattle Interactive Conference for consumer-facing products. Pacific Northwest Venture Summit for institutional connections. Skip the small meetups. Focus on events where decision-makers actually attend. Washington investors don't go to everything like Bay Area VCs do.
Connect through portfolio companies: Every fund lists portfolio companies publicly. Message founders from their last 10 investments. Ask about response time, helpfulness, and follow-on support. Most Seattle founders will tell you honestly which funds are helpful versus hands-off. Use positive feedback conversations to request warm intros to partners. Make sure your outreach avoids common sharing mistakes that can break trust.
Organize diligence materials: Set up an Ellty data room before partner meetings start. Include financial model, customer pipeline, competitive analysis, and team bios. Washington investors expect organized diligence materials earlier in the process than California VCs. They're more methodical about evaluation. Having everything ready in a data room versus email attachments shows you're prepared.
Understand Seattle's pace: Seed rounds close in 6-10 weeks here. Series A takes 10-14 weeks with full diligence. That's 2-4 weeks slower than Bay Area timelines. Washington investors move deliberately. They'll schedule multiple partner meetings before deciding. This isn't slow-walking you, it's their process. Build extra time into your fundraising timeline if targeting Washington capital.
Washington investors prefer sustainable growth over hypergrowth. They won't fund $3M annual burn for a $500K ARR company. Show clear path to profitability within reasonable timeframe. This reflects the ecosystem's roots in profitable tech companies like Microsoft, not venture-subsidized growth.
The Amazon and Microsoft connections matter more than people realize. Half your customers might come from introductions through your investors. But this also means Washington VCs heavily favor B2B enterprise software. Consumer apps and direct-to-consumer brands struggle to raise locally unless they're Maveron's specific focus area.
You'll hit capital constraints at Series B. Only Madrona and Vulcan can lead rounds above $30M. Everyone else needs to bring in California or East Coast co-leads. Factor this into your fundraising strategy. Taking multiple small checks from local angels and seed funds creates a messy cap table when you need to raise a large Series B.
The Sequoia of the Pacific Northwest with 30 years of local investing.
B2B software specialist with 25+ year track record in the Northwest.
Seed-stage specialist backing Pacific Northwest technical founders.
Enterprise infrastructure investors formed from Ignition Partners team.
Consumer brand investors co-founded by Starbucks' Howard Schultz.
Early-stage fund exclusively focused on Pacific Northwest founders.
Paul Allen's investment firm with $10B AUM across multiple funds.
Studio model building companies in-house with external investments too.
B2B software specialists who won't look at consumer deals.
Enterprise infrastructure investors based in Kirkland serving PNW.
Growth equity for profitable Pacific Northwest technology companies.
Seed to Series A fund exclusively backing Pacific Northwest founders.
Cross-border fund investing in US and Canadian technology companies.
Eastern Washington's only active VC serving Spokane ecosystem.
Late-stage and growth equity for established Pacific Northwest companies.
These 15 investors closed over $3B in Washington deals in 2024-2025. Before you start reaching out to Seattle funds, set up proper tracking so you know who's actually interested versus just being polite.
Upload your deck to Ellty and create a unique link for each Washington VC. You'll see which investors open your deck and how long they spend on each slide. Seattle VCs typically review decks within 2-3 days, slower than Bay Area but faster than East Coast. Track which partners on the investment team viewed it. If only associates opened it, you probably won't get a partner meeting.
When Washington investors ask for financials or customer references during diligence, share an Ellty data room instead of scattered email attachments. Your financial model, cap table, contracts, and competitive analysis in one organized place. You'll see which documents they actually review. Seattle investors are methodical about diligence. They'll check everything. Having it organized makes you look prepared.
Do I need to be based in Washington to raise from Washington investors?
Strongly preferred for seed and Series A. Most Washington funds expect local presence for board meetings and relationship building. By Series B you can be anywhere if you have strong traction. Remote raises are possible but harder here than California.
How does Washington compare to California for fundraising?
Washington has about 8% of California's capital but 25% fewer competing founders. You'll raise smaller rounds but face less competition. Good for B2B enterprise. Bad if you need $50M+ rounds or building consumer products.
What's the average seed round size in Washington?
$2.1M across Seattle metro area. That's $1M lower than California but engineering costs are also lower here. Expect $500K-$1.5M lead checks from seed investors. You'll need multiple investors to reach $2M+ rounds.
Should I raise locally in Washington or go to California?
Raise in Washington if you're building B2B enterprise software and want Amazon or Microsoft connections. Go to California if you need larger rounds, building consumer products, or want hypergrowth focus over profitability.
Do Washington investors expect in-person meetings?
Yes for initial meetings and partner presentations. Zoom works for updates. Seattle investors want to meet you 2-3 times in person before committing to term sheets. They're relationship-focused.
What industries get funded most in Washington?
Enterprise SaaS dominates with 60% of deals. Cloud infrastructure and developer tools are strong. Consumer products rarely get funded unless through Maveron. Avoid pitching direct-to-consumer or mobile apps to Washington VCs.
How long does it take to close a round in Washington?
Seed rounds take 6-10 weeks from first meeting to term sheet. Series A needs 10-14 weeks. That's slower than California but reflects methodical diligence process. Don't try to rush Washington investors. It doesn't work.