Papermark has built a solid reputation as an open-source document sharing platform. It handles pitch decks, secure sharing, and viewer analytics without the enterprise bloat. We've been testing alternatives to Papermark for the past two months because different teams have different needs - some want more advanced analytics, others need virtual data rooms, and a few just want something simpler.

Papermark does several things well. It's open-source, which means transparency and community-driven development. The analytics are straightforward - you can see who viewed your documents and track engagement. For teams comfortable with self-hosting or who value open-source tools, it's a strong option.

But we kept hearing from founders who needed specific features Papermark doesn't focus on. Some wanted deeper analytics for investor tracking. Others needed full virtual data room capabilities for due diligence. A few just wanted faster setup without technical configuration.

We've personally tested 9 alternatives to Papermark. Each one handles document sharing differently - some focus on analytics depth, others on security features, and several offer broader collaboration tools. Here's what we discovered after uploading pitch decks, sharing links, and tracking how each platform performs in real scenarios.

Key takeaways

Why look for a Papermark alternative?

Papermark handles document sharing and viewer analytics well. The open-source approach gives you transparency and control over your data. For teams that value community-driven development or want to self-host, that matters. The analytics show who viewed your documents and track basic engagement metrics. For straightforward sharing needs, it works.

But Papermark isn't the only option, and it's not always the best fit for every team.

Better features for the price

Several alternatives offer comparable analytics with additional features at similar or lower costs. Some include virtual data room capabilities specifically built for due diligence. Others provide deeper page-by-page analytics that track exactly where viewers spend time in your pitch deck.

We found tools that offer features Papermark doesn't focus on - like integrated e-signatures, document creation tools, or CRM integrations. Some alternatives include real-time notifications when someone views your document, while others add dynamic watermarking for sensitive materials.

Pricing structures vary significantly too. While Papermark offers free self-hosting and reasonable hosted plans, some alternatives provide flat-rate pricing that saves money as your team grows. Others have more generous free tiers with features that would require paid plans elsewhere.

Different workflow needs

Papermark focuses on open-source document sharing with solid analytics. That's great if you value those specific attributes. But if you're also creating pitch decks from scratch, managing complex due diligence processes, or need integrated collaboration tools, you might benefit from a more comprehensive platform.

Some teams need simpler setup without technical configuration. Papermark requires some comfort with self-hosting or cloud deployment. Other alternatives work immediately - upload, share, track - with zero configuration.

Others need deeper data room features for complex fundraising rounds or M&A processes. Features like granular permission controls, audit trails, and compliance certifications that go beyond basic sharing. The right alternative depends on what you're actually trying to accomplish and which workflow matches your team's needs.

Cost considerations

Papermark's open-source nature keeps costs low, especially if you self-host. But hosted plans and team features still involve costs that add up. We found alternatives with different pricing models that make more sense for certain team sizes.

Some alternatives offer unlimited document sharing where others cap features by plan tier. For high-volume users managing multiple fundraising conversations or client relationships, this makes a real difference. Transaction limits on shared links or viewer tracking can become bottlenecks.

Technical overhead matters too. Self-hosting Papermark saves money but requires technical knowledge and maintenance time. For teams without technical resources, managed alternatives that cost slightly more can actually save money when you account for setup and maintenance effort.

Quick comparison: Papermark alternatives at a glance

Papermark alternatives overview

Here are the best Papermark alternatives in 2026 for document sharing and fundraising (in our opinion):

We tested each of these tools ourselves. Below, we'll break down what we found - the good, the specific use cases, and who each one works best for.

What are the best Papermark alternatives?

The best Papermark alternative depends on what you're actually trying to accomplish.

For most fundraising: Ellty gives you everything Papermark does - secure sharing, page-by-page analytics, real-time notifications - without requiring technical setup or self-hosting knowledge. Upload your deck, get a trackable link, see exactly who viewed what. No configuration, flat-rate pricing that doesn't scale with team size.

For enterprise security: Digify when document control matters more than simplicity. Dynamic watermarking, granular permissions, comprehensive audit trails. Takes longer to set up, costs more, but investors in sensitive industries or M&A scenarios expect this level of security and compliance.

For document workflows: PandaDoc when you need more than just sharing. Create proposals, add e-signatures, track engagement, collect payments, all in one place. Good for teams sending contracts and client documents alongside pitch decks. The analytics aren't as deck-focused, but the workflow coverage is broader.

All-in-one deck creation: Pitch when you're building decks from scratch and want sharing built in. Real-time collaboration, professional templates, then share directly from the platform. Analytics are lighter than dedicated tracking tools, but you're not jumping between creation and sharing tools.

Maximum analytics depth: DocSend when you need extremely detailed viewer data and can justify the premium pricing. Geographic tracking, forwarding detection, device insights. More granular than Papermark's analytics, but costs significantly more per user.

Already using it anyway: Dropbox or Google Drive if you just need basic sharing without detailed analytics. Everyone has these accounts already. No learning curve, no extra cost, but you won't know which pages viewers spent time on or if they actually read your financials.

Bare minimum tracking: BriefLink when you only need to know if someone viewed your deck and which pages. $29/month, nothing fancy, but it answers the basic question: did they actually look at it? Good for solo founders who don't need team features or data rooms.

Technical control: Self-hosted Papermark if you want full infrastructure control and have the technical resources to manage deployment and maintenance. You own the data completely and customize everything. Hosted Papermark available if you want the same tool without managing servers.

Different needs, not better or worse. Papermark works well for what it does, especially if you value open-source development. These alternatives just handle different scenarios or priorities. Pick based on whether you need zero setup, deeper analytics, workflow breadth, enterprise security, or technical flexibility.

Types of Papermark alternatives

Papermark alternatives fall into different categories based on what they actually do.

Secure document sharing with analytics - The core Papermark model. Upload a file, share a trackable link, see who viewed what and for how long. Ellty, DocSend, and BriefLink follow this approach. You're tracking engagement, not building documents or managing complex workflows. Perfect for pitch decks, investor updates, and sales collateral where knowing "did they read it?" matters. These tools focus on viewer analytics as their primary value.

Document workflow platforms - More than just sharing. PandaDoc fits here. Create documents from scratch, add e-signatures, collect payments, then track everything. You're managing the entire document lifecycle in one place. Good when you need proposals, contracts, and pitch materials all handled through the same system. The analytics are secondary to the workflow automation.

Collaborative deck builders - Create and share without jumping between tools. Pitch does this. Build your presentation inside the platform with real-time team editing, then share it directly. The analytics are lighter than dedicated tracking tools, but you're not exporting from PowerPoint and uploading to a separate sharing platform. Design and distribution happen in one place.

Enterprise security platforms - When control matters more than convenience. Digify focuses here. Watermarking, screenshot prevention, remote access revocation, granular permissions, compliance certifications. Setup takes longer, costs more, but you get security features that basic sharing tools don't offer. Built for sensitive documents where leaks have real consequences, like M&A or regulated industries.

Universal file storage - General-purpose tools that happen to share files. Dropbox and Google Drive. Everyone already has them, they integrate with everything, but analytics are minimal or nonexistent. You can share a pitch deck through Drive, but you won't know if anyone actually opened it beyond a basic view count. No page-level tracking, no engagement insights.

Client portal systems - Ongoing workspace for relationships, not one-off shares. Notion and similar tools build here. Shared workspaces with documents, databases, tasks, discussions. Overkill if you're just sending a deck to an investor. Perfect if you're managing ongoing collaboration where documents are part of a broader context.

Minimalist trackers - Stripped-down analytics without the complexity. BriefLink is the example. Upload a PDF, get a link, see page views. No team features, no virtual data rooms, no learning curve. Answers one question: did they look at it? For solo founders who just need basic tracking without paying for unused features.

Open-source alternatives - Tools you can self-host and customize. Papermark itself sits here, along with a few other open-source document sharing platforms. You manage the technical infrastructure yourself, but you own the data completely and can modify the software. Good for teams with technical resources who value transparency and control over convenience.

Different problems, different tools. Papermark sits in the secure sharing category with an open-source twist. These alternatives either do the same thing with different approaches (managed hosting, proprietary software, simpler interfaces), or solve adjacent problems entirely (document creation, enterprise security, workflow automation). Pick based on whether you need tracking depth, technical control, workflow breadth, zero setup time, or just simple file sharing.

The 9 best Papermark alternatives in 2026

1. Ellty - For pitch deck analytics without complexity

Ratings and Reviews: Recently launched - early users highlight quick setup and clean analytics interface

We tried Ellty early in our testing because we needed something that worked immediately without extensive setup. Ellty focuses on pitch deck sharing, protecting, and analytics built specifically for fundraising teams. What we appreciated most was how fast we could upload a deck, create a trackable link, and start seeing viewer data.

Papermark vs Ellty

Why fundraising teams love it

When we tested this with a sample pitch deck, the setup took less than five minutes. Upload deck, generate link, done. The analytics showed exactly which pages investors spent time on and which ones they skipped. For founders tracking multiple investor conversations, this matters.

We found this particularly useful when you need to know if investors actually reviewed your financials or just skimmed the overview. The real-time notifications told us immediately when someone opened the deck. No waiting to check a dashboard.

The virtual data room feature handles due diligence documents separately from pitch materials. Founders we talked to mentioned using Ellty for both initial outreach and later-stage document sharing without switching platforms.

Best For: Founders who need quick pitch deck sharing with detailed viewer analytics and don't want technical setup.

Pricing: Free basic tier; Pro plans start at $29/month with advanced analytics and data room features.

Support: Email and chat support available. Documentation covers common setup scenarios clearly.

Ellty vs Papermark: key differences

The best managed alternative to Papermark for fundraising teams

Startup founders who need pitch deck analytics without technical setup. Teams managing investor relationships who want real-time notifications when decks are viewed. Companies preparing for due diligence who need data rooms alongside deck sharing.

Perfect if you've ever thought "I just want to upload my deck and track investors without learning server configuration or managing infrastructure."

2. DocSend - For enterprise teams with deep analytics needs

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.5/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.6/5 ⭐

DocSend is the established player here. We tested it because many investors expect DocSend links. It's owned by Dropbox now, which means tight integration if you're already in that ecosystem. The analytics go deep - time spent per page, geographic location, device type, and forwarding tracking.

Papermark vs DocSend

For a detailed comparison, check out our Papermark vs DocSend breakdown.

Why enterprise teams love it

When we uploaded our test documents to DocSend, the permission controls stood out immediately. You can set expiration dates, require email verification before viewing, and disable downloads entirely. For legal teams or enterprise sales, these controls matter.

The analytics dashboard shows everything. We could see exactly when someone forwarded the link to a colleague, which sections they revisited, and even if they took screenshots (on some platforms). For large funding rounds where you're managing dozens of investor relationships, this level of detail helps prioritize follow-ups.

We found the Dropbox integration useful if your team already lives there. Documents sync automatically, and you can create shareable links without leaving Dropbox. The downside is cost - at $50 per user per month, small teams pay significantly more than other options.

Best For: Enterprise teams and established startups that need maximum analytics detail and advanced security controls.

Pricing: Starts at $50/user/month for the Professional plan with full analytics.

Support: 24/7 support for paid plans. Extensive knowledge base and onboarding resources.

"DocSend's analytics helped us understand which investors were actually interested based on how long they spent on our financials."

— VP of Sales, Series B Startup, G2

DocSend vs Papermark: key differences

The best enterprise-grade alternative to Papermark

Well-funded startups and established companies needing maximum analytics detail. Teams managing dozens of investor relationships simultaneously. Organizations where Dropbox integration and corporate security controls justify premium pricing.

Perfect if you've ever thought "I need to know exactly who forwarded my deck and which specific pages each person reviewed, and budget isn't the primary constraint."

3. PandaDoc - For complete document workflow automation

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.7/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.5/5 ⭐

We tested PandaDoc because it handles more than just sharing - it manages the entire document lifecycle. Create, send, track, and sign documents all in one platform. If you're sending contracts, proposals, or sales documents regularly, PandaDoc makes more sense than pure sharing tools.

Papermark vs PandaDoc

Why sales teams love it

When we created a test proposal in PandaDoc, the template library saved significant time. You can build documents with drag-and-drop elements, pricing tables, and signature fields. The tracking shows when recipients open the document, which sections they review, and when they sign.

We found this particularly valuable for sales teams sending proposals that need signatures. Instead of sending a PDF, waiting for questions, then emailing a separate DocuSign link, everything happens in one flow. The recipient views the proposal, asks questions through comments, and signs immediately.

The analytics focus on conversion rather than just viewing behavior. PandaDoc tells you which proposals close and which don't, helping identify what works. For teams sending dozens of proposals monthly, these insights matter more than granular page-view data.

Best For: Sales teams and businesses that need document creation, tracking, and e-signature capabilities in one platform.

Pricing: Starts at $19/user/month for the Essentials plan; Business plan at $49/user/month includes advanced features.

Support: Email, chat, and phone support. Implementation help available for enterprise plans.

"We consolidated three tools into PandaDoc - document creation, sharing, and signing. The time savings alone justified the cost."

— Sales Director, SaaS Company, Capterra

PandaDoc vs Papermark: key differences

The best workflow alternative to Papermark

Sales teams who need proposals, contracts, and signatures in one workflow. Agencies creating custom documents for every client. Companies tired of jumping between Google Docs, Papermark, and DocuSign just to close one deal.

Perfect if you've ever thought "why am I using three different tools just to get a document created, shared, and signed" while managing your sales process.

4. Pitch - For modern pitch deck creation and sharing combined

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.5/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.6/5 ⭐

Pitch approaches the problem differently - it's a presentation tool first, sharing platform second. We tested it because several founders mentioned needing both creation and sharing in one place. If you're building decks from scratch regularly, Pitch combines design tools with analytics.

Papermark vs Pitch

Why design-focused teams love it

When we tried building a deck in Pitch, the interface felt like a modern design tool. Templates look professional immediately, and the real-time collaboration meant our whole team could edit simultaneously. No more version control nightmares with PowerPoint files.

The sharing analytics track views and engagement, though not as deeply as DocSend or Ellty. You'll see who viewed your deck and for how long, but the focus is more on creating beautiful presentations quickly. For teams that iterate on decks constantly - like agencies pitching clients - this workflow makes sense.

We found the integration with other tools helpful. Import from PowerPoint or Google Slides, collaborate in Pitch, then share with tracking. The free tier works for individuals, and paid plans unlock team features and advanced templates.

Best For: Teams that need both deck creation and sharing, particularly those who value design quality and collaborative editing.

Pricing: Free for individuals; Pro plan starts at $8/user/month.

Support: Email support and comprehensive help documentation. Community forum for user questions.

"Pitch replaced both our design tool and our sharing platform. The templates alone save hours every week."

— Creative Director, Marketing Agency, G2

Pitch vs Papermark: key differences

The best creation-focused alternative to Papermark

Teams building presentations from scratch regularly. Design-conscious founders who want professional templates built in. Collaborative teams where multiple people need to edit decks simultaneously before sharing.

Perfect if you've ever thought "I'm tired of designing in PowerPoint, exporting, then uploading to a separate sharing tool just to send one deck."

5. BriefLink - For minimalist link tracking without extra features

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.3/5 ⭐ | Trustpilot: 4.2/5 ⭐

We tested BriefLink because sometimes you just need link tracking without building a virtual data room. It's intentionally simple - create a trackable link for any content, see who clicks, done. No complex setup, no feature bloat.

Papermark vs BriefLink

Why minimalists love it

When we set up our first BriefLink, it took about 30 seconds. Paste your document URL (could be Google Drive, Dropbox, anywhere), create a trackable link, share it. The analytics show clicks, geographic location, and device type. That's it.

We found this approach useful when you already have documents hosted elsewhere and just need to know if people are actually clicking your links. For consultants sharing Google Docs or designers sharing Figma links, BriefLink adds tracking without changing your existing workflow.

The limitation is obvious - you're not hosting documents, just tracking links to them. If you need permission controls, page-by-page analytics, or secure hosting, BriefLink won't work. But if you need simple tracking, it delivers exactly that.

Best For: Individuals and small teams that need basic link tracking without additional features or complexity.

Pricing: Starts at $29/month for unlimited tracked links and basic analytics.

Support: Email support with typically fast response times. Simple enough that you rarely need help.

BriefLink vs Papermark: key differences

The best minimalist alternative to Papermark

Solo founders who just need basic tracking without complexity. Small teams sharing documents occasionally who don't need data rooms or advanced features. Anyone who values "upload and track" simplicity over comprehensive analytics.

Perfect if you've ever thought "I don't need all these features, I just want to know if someone actually opened my document and which pages they looked at."

6. Notion - For collaborative workspace sharing beyond documents

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.7/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.8/5 ⭐

We included Notion because many teams already use it, and the sharing features have improved significantly. It's not purpose-built for pitch deck analytics, but it handles document collaboration and sharing in a different way - as part of a broader workspace.

Papermark vs Notion

Why collaborative teams love it

When we shared documents through Notion, the benefit was context. Instead of sending a pitch deck, you can share a workspace with the deck, detailed product specs, financial models, and roadmap all in one place. For due diligence, this centralization helps.

We found teams using Notion for internal collaboration, then sharing specific pages externally when needed. The analytics are basic - you can see page views but not detailed engagement metrics. For investor sharing specifically, this might not provide enough data about who reviewed what.

The real value is if your team already lives in Notion. You're writing docs, managing projects, and tracking tasks there anyway. Sharing becomes an extension of existing work rather than a separate tool. The free tier is generous, and paid plans add collaboration features.

Best For: Teams already using Notion for internal work who want to share documents as part of broader workspace collaboration.

Pricing: Free for individuals; Plus plan starts at $10/user/month for small teams.

Support: Email support and extensive community resources. Documentation is comprehensive.

"We organize everything in Notion, so sharing investor updates through the same platform made sense. Less context switching."

— Founder, Early-stage Startup, G2

Notion vs Papermark: key differences

The best workspace alternative to Papermark

Teams already using Notion internally who want to share documents as part of broader workspace collaboration. Companies organizing due diligence materials with context and notes alongside documents. Groups that need documents integrated with tasks and project tracking.

Perfect if you've ever thought "our whole company works in Notion already, why add another tool just to share documents externally when we can share pages directly."

7. Digify - For secure data rooms with granular controls

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.6/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.7/5 ⭐

We tested Digify specifically for its data room capabilities. It's built for due diligence scenarios where security and control matter more than ease of sharing. If you're managing sensitive documents for M&A, fundraising, or legal processes, Digify focuses on those needs.

Papermark vs Digify

Why legal and finance teams love it

When we uploaded sensitive documents to Digify, the permission options stood out immediately. You can control who downloads, who prints, set expiration dates, and add dynamic watermarks with viewer email addresses. For confidential due diligence, these features matter.

We found the audit trail particularly useful. Every action gets logged - who viewed what document, when, for how long, and from which IP address. For compliance or legal requirements, this level of tracking is sometimes mandatory. The analytics focus on security and access patterns rather than engagement optimization.

In our testing, the interface felt more corporate than consumer-friendly tools. This makes sense given the target user - law firms, investment banks, and corporate development teams. The learning curve is steeper, but the security features justify it for high-stakes scenarios.

Best For: Due diligence processes, M&A transactions, and any scenario requiring enterprise-grade document security and detailed audit trails.

Pricing: Starts at $49/month for the Essentials plan; Pro plan at $149/month includes advanced security features.

Support: Email and chat support with priority response for higher tiers. Implementation assistance available.

"Digify's watermarking and download controls gave us confidence sharing sensitive financials during our acquisition process."

— CFO, Mid-market Company, Capterra

Digify vs Papermark: key differences

The best security-first alternative to Papermark

Due diligence teams managing M&A transactions. Legal departments sharing confidential documents. Companies in regulated industries requiring comprehensive audit trails and access controls.

Perfect if you've ever thought "I need to share sensitive documents but need absolute control over who accesses what, with watermarks and the ability to revoke access remotely."

8. Google Drive - For basic sharing with universal access

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.6/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.7/5 ⭐

We included Google Drive because everyone already has it, and sometimes basic sharing is all you need. It won't give you detailed analytics or advanced security, but it's free, universally accessible, and requires zero setup. For casual sharing or internal collaboration, it works.

Papermark vs Google Drive

Why casual users choose it

When we shared documents through Google Drive, it worked exactly as expected. Upload file, generate shareable link, set permissions (view, comment, edit), send it. The recipient clicks and views immediately. No account required for basic viewing.

We found Google Drive most useful for internal team sharing or casual external sharing where analytics don't matter. The version history helps when multiple people edit documents, and the integration with Docs, Sheets, and Slides is seamless if you work in Google's ecosystem.

The limitation for professional use is obvious - you get almost no data about viewer behavior. You'll see total view counts, but not who viewed, when, or for how long. For investor relations or sales tracking, this lack of data makes Google Drive insufficient.

Best For: Teams already in Google Workspace needing basic document sharing without specialized analytics or security requirements.

Pricing: Free tier includes 15GB storage; Google Workspace starts at $6/user/month for business accounts.

Support: Community forums for free users; business plans include email and phone support.

Google Drive vs Papermark: key differences

The best universal alternative to Papermark

Teams already using Google Workspace who need basic document sharing without analytics requirements. Internal collaboration where tracking viewer behavior doesn't matter. Budget-conscious teams where free sharing suffices.

Perfect if you've ever thought "we just need to share files with basic access controls, we don't need to know exactly who viewed what or how long they spent reading."

9. Dropbox - For robust file management with sharing capabilities

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.4/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.5/5 ⭐

We tested Dropbox because it's evolved beyond basic storage. The sharing features have improved, and with DocSend integration (same company now), there's a path to more advanced analytics if needed. For teams already using Dropbox for storage, the sharing features add value without additional tools.

Papermark vs Dropbox

Why file-heavy teams choose it

When we shared files through Dropbox, the file management capabilities stood out. Version history, file recovery, and team folders make it more than a sharing tool. If your team generates lots of files - design assets, documents, media - Dropbox organizes everything before you share it.

We found the Paper feature (Dropbox's document editor) useful for lightweight collaboration. Create docs directly in Dropbox, share them, and track basic engagement. It's not as powerful as dedicated tools, but it works for simple scenarios.

The path to DocSend integration matters here. Start with basic Dropbox sharing, upgrade to DocSend when you need detailed analytics. For teams growing from casual sharing to professional fundraising, this progression makes sense without switching platforms entirely.

Best For: Teams needing robust file storage and management with basic sharing capabilities, or those planning to upgrade to DocSend eventually.

Pricing: Starts at $11.99/user/month for Plus plan; Professional at $19.99/user/month.

Support: Email support for all paid plans; phone support for Business plans.

"We use Dropbox for all our files anyway. The sharing features are basic but work fine for our needs."

— Operations Manager, Design Studio, G2

Dropbox vs Papermark: key differences

The best file-focused alternative to Papermark

Teams needing comprehensive file storage and management with sharing as a secondary feature. Organizations already using Dropbox for file syncing who want to add basic sharing. Companies planning to upgrade to DocSend eventually for advanced analytics.

Perfect if you've ever thought "we need solid file storage and version control first, with the ability to share documents as needed, but detailed analytics aren't the priority right now."

How we chose which Papermark alternative to recommend

After testing all these alternatives, here's what we'd consider if we were choosing for our own business.

Your use case matters most

Are you fundraising, doing due diligence, or just sharing documents with clients? We found that fundraising teams need detailed analytics to track investor engagement - tools like Ellty or DocSend make sense here. If you're managing M&A due diligence, Digify's security controls justify the learning curve. For casual client sharing, Google Drive or Dropbox probably work fine.

Budget and team size

Per-user pricing adds up fast. DocSend at $50 per user works for well-funded teams but hurts early-stage startups. We calculated costs for a five-person team - some tools cost $250/month, others offer flat rates around $50/month total. For small teams, flat-rate pricing like Ellty or BriefLink makes more financial sense.

What features do you actually need versus nice-to-have? We found teams often pay for enterprise features they never use. If you don't need e-signatures, why pay for PandaDoc? If basic link tracking works, BriefLink saves money over feature-rich platforms.

Technical requirements

Integration needs matter. If your team lives in Dropbox, staying in that ecosystem makes sense. If you use Salesforce or HubSpot, PandaDoc's CRM integrations save manual work. We tested these connections and found that native integrations work better than third-party connectors.

Security and compliance requirements vary by industry. Legal teams need audit trails and watermarking (Digify). Most startups don't. Ease of setup matters too - some tools took hours to configure, others worked in minutes. For time-constrained founders, immediate usability beats extensive features.

Analytics needs

Do you need detailed viewer insights or just basic tracking? If you're fundraising, analytics like page-by-page engagement and time spent help you prioritize follow-ups with interested investors. We found this data changed how we approached investor conversations. For less critical sharing, view counts might be enough.

Support and reliability

Response times matter when you're on deadline. We tested support by submitting questions to each platform. Some responded within hours, others took days. Onboarding help varies too - some tools leave you to figure things out, others offer implementation support. For teams without technical resources, good support matters more than extra features.

Common questions about Papermark alternatives (from our testing)

What is Papermark best known for?

Papermark is known for being an open-source document sharing platform with viewer analytics. It appeals to teams that value transparency, want to self-host, or prefer community-driven development. The analytics track who views your documents and basic engagement metrics without enterprise complexity.

Why do businesses look for Papermark alternatives?

Based on our research and conversations, teams look for alternatives for a few reasons. Some need deeper analytics for investor tracking - page-by-page insights rather than just document views. Others want full virtual data room capabilities for due diligence. A few need specific integrations with CRM systems or design tools. Some just want simpler setup without technical configuration.

Are these alternatives cheaper than Papermark?

It depends. Papermark offers free self-hosting and reasonably priced hosted plans. Some alternatives like Google Drive or Notion have free tiers for basic use. Others like DocSend cost significantly more ($50/user/month) but include enterprise features. We found Ellty and BriefLink priced competitively with Papermark while offering different feature sets. The best value depends on which features you actually use.

Which alternative is best for early-stage startups?

From our testing, early-stage startups benefit most from tools that balance simplicity with useful analytics. Ellty works well here - quick setup, clear investor tracking, and pricing that scales. Notion works if your team already uses it internally. Google Drive handles basic sharing for free. Avoid enterprise tools like DocSend or Digify unless you're well-funded - the costs and complexity don't match early-stage needs.

Do I need a virtual data room for fundraising?

Not initially. For first investor conversations, simple pitch deck sharing with analytics works fine. We found that data rooms become necessary during due diligence when investors request detailed documents - financial statements, legal agreements, customer contracts. Early conversations need sharing and tracking. Later stages need organized document repositories with access controls. Tools like Ellty or Digify handle both, but you won't use data room features until due diligence starts.

Can I switch from Papermark to another tool easily?

Yes, switching is straightforward since you're primarily sharing documents. Your files live on your computer - you just upload them to a new platform and create new shareable links. The analytics history stays with Papermark, so you'll lose historical data unless you export it first. We tested switching between platforms and found it takes minimal time. The bigger decision is choosing what works best going forward rather than worrying about switching difficulty.

What's the difference between Papermark and DocSend?

Papermark focuses on open-source document sharing with solid analytics at accessible pricing. DocSend targets enterprise teams with extremely detailed analytics, advanced security controls, and premium pricing. We found DocSend offers more granular data - forwarding tracking, screenshot detection, geographic insights. Papermark provides core analytics most teams actually need. DocSend costs 5-10x more depending on team size. Choose based on whether you need enterprise features and can justify the cost.

How important are analytics for document sharing?

It depends on your goals. For fundraising, analytics changed how we prioritized investor follow-ups. Knowing which investors spent 10 minutes on financials versus 30 seconds total helped focus our outreach. For client proposals, conversion data helps identify what works. For casual sharing, analytics barely matter - you just need confirmation that someone viewed the document. We'd say analytics are critical for sales and fundraising, helpful for client work, and optional for internal or casual sharing.

Cheapest Papermark alternatives

If you're watching costs carefully, several low-price alternatives offer solid document sharing and basic analytics:

1. Ellty

Ellty offers a free tier that covers basic pitch deck sharing with analytics. The paid plans start at $29/month with flat-rate pricing - no per-user fees that scale with team size. You get page-by-page analytics, real-time notifications, and virtual data room features without the technical setup Papermark requires.

We found Ellty pricing particularly competitive for small teams. Three people using analytics tools with per-user pricing might pay $150/month. Ellty flat rate means the same features cost $29/month total. For growing teams, this pricing model makes significantly more sense.

The interface is clean and works immediately. Upload your deck, generate a trackable link, start seeing viewer data. No configuration needed, no technical knowledge required. If you need analytics without complexity or scaling costs, Ellty delivers at a price point that's hard to beat.

2. BriefLink

At $29/month for unlimited tracked links, BriefLink is one of the most affordable dedicated tracking options we tested. You get basic page-by-page analytics and shareable links. No team features, no virtual data room, but for solo founders tracking investor engagement, it works.

The interface is bare-bones by design. Upload a PDF, get a link, see who viewed which pages and for how long. That's it. If you need more features like permission controls or data rooms, you'll need to look elsewhere. But you won't find a much cheaper way to track document views with page-level detail.

BriefLink makes sense if you already host documents elsewhere and just need tracking. Point your BriefLink URL to a Google Drive file or Dropbox link, and you add analytics to your existing workflow without changing it.

3. Google Drive

Free for basic use, Google Drive with Business Standard at $6/user/month is hard to beat on price. The catch: you get almost no analytics. You can see if someone opened a file, but not which pages they viewed or how long they spent reading.

Good enough for internal sharing or casual document distribution. Not good enough for fundraising where you need to know if an investor actually read your financials. But if cost is the primary concern and basic sharing suffices, Google Drive works.

For teams already paying for Google Workspace, the sharing features come free. No additional tools, no extra costs. Just less data about viewer behavior compared to purpose-built analytics platforms.

Our final thoughts on Papermark alternatives

After weeks of testing these tools, the landscape of document sharing options has gotten significantly better. There's no single "best" tool that works for everyone - it genuinely depends on what you're trying to accomplish and which features actually matter for your specific situation.

We found Ellty great for fundraising teams that need quick setup and clear investor analytics without paying enterprise prices. DocSend suits well-funded startups and established companies that need maximum detail and don't mind the cost. PandaDoc makes sense for sales teams managing proposals from creation through signature. For basic sharing where analytics don't matter, Google Drive or Dropbox work fine.

Choose based on your actual needs, not what sounds impressive. We talked to founders who paid for features they never used and others who missed critical capabilities because they chose the cheapest option. Test a few platforms with your real documents. See which interface makes sense, which analytics help your decisions, and which pricing fits your budget.

Whether you go with Ellty for straightforward pitch deck analytics and data rooms, DocSend for enterprise-grade tracking, or even Google Drive for simple sharing, pick what actually solves your problems. The right tool is the one you'll actually use effectively, not the one with the longest feature list.

If you have questions about any of these tools or want to discuss specific use cases, most platforms offer free trials or demos. Start there rather than committing based on marketing pages alone.

Disclaimer

Parties other than Ellty may provide products, services, recommendations, or views on this site ("Third Party Materials"). Ellty is not responsible for examining or evaluating such Third Party Materials, and does not provide any warranties relating to the Third Party Materials. Links to such Third Party Materials are for your convenience and does not constitute an endorsement of such Third Party Materials.