We tested 7 HelpRange alternatives - here's what we found

HelpRange works well for document tracking and analytics. Plenty of sales teams and agencies use it to see who opens their PDFs and how long they spend on each page. The analytics dashboard is clean, and the setup process is straightforward.

We've been testing alternatives to HelpRange for the past few months. Some businesses need more affordable options. Others want additional features like virtual data rooms or pitch deck-specific analytics. A few teams just prefer different interfaces or pricing models.

The main reasons people look for alternatives: pricing structures that don't scale well for growing teams, need for more advanced data room features during fundraising, wanting simpler tools without enterprise complexity, or looking for platforms built specifically for pitch decks rather than general documents.

We've personally tested 7 alternatives to HelpRange. Each handles document sharing and analytics differently. Some focus on simplicity, others on comprehensive security features, and a few offer specialized tools for specific use cases like fundraising or sales. Here's what we discovered after testing each one with real documents and tracking the differences that actually matter.

Key takeaways

Why look for a HelpRange alternative?

HelpRange handles document tracking and viewer analytics well. The page-by-page insights show you exactly who opened your files and how long they spent on each section. For sales teams and agencies tracking client engagement, that's useful data.

But HelpRange isn't the only option, and it's not always the best fit for every use case.

Better features for the price

Several alternatives offer comparable analytics with additional features at similar or lower costs. Some include pitch deck-specific features that HelpRange doesn't emphasize. Others provide virtual data room capabilities for fundraising teams.

We found tools that offer flat-rate pricing instead of scaling with document volume or users, which saves money as your sharing needs grow. Some alternatives include features like real-time collaboration or e-signatures that HelpRange lacks entirely.

Different workflow needs

HelpRange focuses specifically on document tracking and analytics. That's great if you only need those features. But if you're also fundraising with pitch decks, managing due diligence documents, or need integrated proposal workflows, you might benefit from a more specialized platform.

Some teams need simpler tools without enterprise complexity. Others need deeper security features like watermarking for confidential materials. The right alternative depends on what you're actually trying to accomplish with your document sharing.

Cost considerations

HelpRange's pricing structure works for some teams but not others. We found alternatives with different pricing models that make more sense for specific use cases - flat monthly rates for unlimited sharing, free tiers for occasional use, or specialized pricing for fundraising scenarios.

Feature limits also matter. Some alternatives offer unlimited documents or viewers where HelpRange caps certain capabilities by plan tier. For high-volume users or growing teams, this makes a real difference in total cost.

HelpRange alternatives overview

Here are the best HelpRange alternatives in 2026 for document tracking (in our opinion)

What are the best HelpRange alternatives?

The best HelpRange alternative depends on what you're actually trying to accomplish.

For fundraising specifically: Ellty gives you pitch deck analytics without the complexity. Upload your deck, share a trackable link, see which pages investors viewed and for how long. Real-time notifications when someone opens your materials. The virtual data room feature handles due diligence documents without switching platforms. Flat-rate pricing means no surprises as your team grows.

For enterprise sales teams: DocSend when you need deep CRM integrations. Connects directly to Salesforce and HubSpot so document views flow into your pipeline automatically. The analytics are comprehensive, tracking patterns across multiple documents and stakeholders. Per-user pricing scales with your team, but you get enterprise-grade features and 24/7 support.

For complete document workflows: PandaDoc when tracking alone isn't enough. Create proposals inside the platform, add e-signatures, collect payments, track engagement. You're managing the entire sales cycle in one place instead of jumping between tools. Takes longer to learn than simple trackers, but eliminates multiple software subscriptions.

Open-source control: Papermark if you need data to stay on your infrastructure. Self-host for free, customize the code, audit everything yourself. Good for regulated industries or teams with strict privacy requirements. The cloud-hosted version exists if you want their approach without managing servers.

Team collaboration focus: Pitch when you're building presentations together before sharing them. Real-time editing with your team, professional templates, then track views directly from the platform. The analytics are lighter than dedicated tracking tools, but you're not exporting from Figma and uploading elsewhere.

Maximum document security: Digify when you're sharing truly confidential materials. Dynamic watermarking puts viewer emails on every page they see. Screenshot prevention, remote access revocation, granular permissions. Setup takes longer and costs more, but M&A teams and legal departments need these features.

Bare minimum tracking: BriefLink when you just need confirmation someone viewed your document. Simple click tracking, basic engagement metrics, nothing fancy. The interface is stripped down on purpose. You share a link, you see who clicked, done.

Different needs, not better or worse. HelpRange works well for general document tracking. These alternatives either handle the same use case with different pricing models, or solve adjacent problems like security, collaboration, or workflow automation. Pick based on whether you need specialized features for fundraising, enterprise integrations, or just simpler tracking.

Types of HelpRange alternatives

HelpRange alternatives fall into different categories based on what they actually do.

Document tracking platforms - The core model HelpRange uses. Upload files, share trackable links, see viewer analytics. Ellty, DocSend, and BriefLink follow this approach. You're measuring engagement, not creating documents or managing complex processes. Perfect when knowing "who viewed what and when" drives your decisions - fundraising follow-ups, sales pipeline tracking, content distribution.

Full document workflow systems - Beyond just tracking. PandaDoc lives here. Create documents from templates, add e-signatures, automate approval chains, collect payments, then track everything. You're managing the entire document lifecycle instead of just the sharing step. Makes sense when you need proposals, contracts, and tracking all in one system rather than cobbling together separate tools.

Collaboration-first presentation tools - Build and share without tool-hopping. Pitch does this. Design your deck inside the platform with real-time team editing, maintain brand consistency, then share directly. Analytics exist but they're secondary to the creation workflow. Good when multiple people build decks frequently and you want one system for both.

Security-focused data rooms - When protection matters more than ease of use. Digify specializes here. Watermarking, screenshot blocking, access revocation, forensic tracking. Setup complexity is higher, pricing reflects the advanced features, but sensitive documents need these controls. Built for scenarios where unauthorized sharing creates legal or financial risk.

General file storage that happens to share - Universal platforms everyone already uses. Dropbox and Google Drive. They share files competently but don't track engagement. You can send a pitch deck through Drive, but you won't know if recipients opened it or which sections they actually read. Good for internal sharing, limited for external tracking needs.

Client workspace platforms - Ongoing portals for relationship management. Clinked builds this. White-labeled spaces with file sharing, messaging, task management, discussions. Way too much for one-time document sharing. Perfect for agencies, consultants, or service providers managing multiple clients with continuous file exchanges and communication needs.

Minimalist link trackers - Stripped-down analytics only. BriefLink is the example. Upload a document, get a trackable link, see basic metrics. No team features, no workflow automation, no learning curve. Answers one question clearly: did they actually look at my document?

Open-source document control - Self-hosted alternatives for privacy or customization. Papermark fits here. Run it on your own servers, modify the code, control your data completely. Technical setup required, but you own everything. Hosted versions available if you want the privacy-first approach without infrastructure management.

Different problems, different solutions. HelpRange sits in the document tracking category with solid analytics and straightforward sharing. These alternatives either approach the same problem differently (pricing models, interface design, feature depth), or solve related but distinct needs (security, collaboration, workflow automation). Pick based on whether you need tracking depth, creation tools, security features, or technical control.

Quick comparison: HelpRange alternatives at a glance

We tested each of these tools ourselves. Below, we'll break down what we found - the good, the specific use cases, and who each one works best for.

1. Ellty - For pitch deck sharing with straightforward analytics

Ratings and Reviews: Recently launched - early users highlight the clean interface and quick setup process.

We tried Ellty early in our testing because we wanted to see how a pitch deck-focused platform compared to general document trackers. Ellty offers viewer analytics, trackable sharing links, and virtual data room features built specifically for startup fundraising. What we appreciated most was how quickly we could upload a deck and start tracking views without wrestling with complex settings.

HelpRange vs Ellty

Why startup founders love it

When we tested this with a sample pitch deck, the setup took less than five minutes. Upload the deck, generate a shareable link, and you're tracking views immediately. We found this particularly useful when testing how quickly we could send materials to potential investors without any learning curve.

The analytics show which pages viewers spent time on and when they opened your deck. Founders we talked to mentioned this helps them follow up at the right moment. In our testing, the real-time notifications stood out because you know immediately when someone views your materials.

The virtual data room feature handles due diligence documents without requiring a separate platform. For early-stage startups, this means one tool for both initial pitch sharing and later-stage document requests.

Best For: Founders who need quick pitch deck sharing with viewer analytics and simple data room features.

Pricing: Free starter plan; Pro at $24/month; Business at $50/month. We tested the Pro plan, which gave us unlimited pitch decks and detailed analytics without per-user fees.

Support: Email and in-app chat support. Documentation covers common setup questions clearly.

"Set up our data room in under an hour. The analytics helped us time our investor follow-ups perfectly." — Startup Founder, Seed Stage, Early User Feedback

Try Ellty if you need pitch deck analytics without complex enterprise features. You can test the core features with the free starter plan to see if it fits your workflow.

2. DocSend - For enterprise teams needing extensive integrations

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.5/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.6/5 ⭐

DocSend is probably the most recognized name in document tracking. We tested it because many founders mentioned it as their first choice. DocSend offers comprehensive document analytics, data rooms, and integration with tools like Salesforce and HubSpot. The platform feels polished and built for teams already using enterprise software.

HelpRange vs DocSend

Why enterprise teams love it

When we tested DocSend with a multi-page document, the analytics were incredibly detailed. You see not just who viewed what, but patterns across multiple documents and viewers. We found this particularly useful when tracking multiple stakeholders reviewing the same materials.

The Dropbox integration makes sense if you're already storing documents there. In our testing, the enterprise features like custom branding and advanced permissions stood out for larger teams. The downside is the per-user pricing adds up quickly for growing companies.

Sales teams benefit from the CRM integrations. You can track document views directly in your sales pipeline without switching platforms.

Best For: Enterprise sales teams and established companies needing deep integrations with existing tools.

Pricing: Starts at $10/user/month for Personal plan; Team plans scale with users. We tested the Team plan, which includes data rooms and advanced analytics.

Support: 24/7 support for paid plans, extensive knowledge base, and onboarding assistance.

"The Salesforce integration saves hours of manual tracking. We see exactly which prospects engage with our proposals." — Sales Director, Mid-size B2B, G2

3. PandaDoc - For teams needing documents and e-signatures together

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.7/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.5/5 ⭐

We tried PandaDoc because it combines document tracking with proposal creation and e-signatures. PandaDoc offers a full document workflow platform - create proposals, track views, collect signatures, and manage the entire sales process. What stood out was how it handles the complete document lifecycle, not just tracking.

HelpRange vs PandaDoc

Why sales teams love it

When we tested this with a sample proposal, the ability to create, send, track, and sign in one platform eliminated multiple tools. We found this particularly useful when testing sales workflows where you need more than just analytics.

The templates help sales reps create professional proposals quickly. In our testing, the e-signature feature stood out because recipients can review and sign without leaving the platform. For teams closing deals, this streamlines the entire process.

The analytics show engagement, but the real value is in the workflow automation. You can set up approval chains, payment collection, and CRM updates all tied to document status.

Best For: Sales teams that need proposal creation, tracking, and e-signatures in one platform.

Pricing: Starts at $19/user/month for Essentials; Business plan at $49/user/month includes advanced features. We tested the Business plan, which gave us full workflow automation.

Support: Phone, email, and chat support. Extensive template library and training resources.

"Went from three separate tools to just PandaDoc. Our sales cycle shortened by eliminating back-and-forth on signatures." — VP Sales, SaaS Company, Capterra

4. Papermark - For teams wanting open-source document control

Ratings and Reviews: GitHub: 4.8/5 ⭐ | Building review history on traditional platforms

Papermark caught our attention as an open-source alternative. We tested it because some teams prioritize data control and privacy over managed services. Papermark offers self-hosted document sharing with viewer analytics, no data leaving your infrastructure. The platform is straightforward and privacy-focused.

HelpRange vs Papermark

Why privacy-focused teams love it

When we tested the self-hosted version, setup took some technical knowledge but gave us complete control. We found this particularly useful when testing scenarios where data couldn't leave specific geographic regions or networks.

The analytics work similarly to other platforms - you see who viewed what and for how long. In our testing, the open-source nature stood out because you can customize features or audit the code yourself. For regulated industries or security-conscious organizations, this matters.

The cloud-hosted option exists if you want Papermark's features without managing infrastructure. You get the same privacy-first approach with easier setup.

Best For: Technical teams or organizations with strict data control requirements.

Pricing: Free for self-hosted; cloud version starts at €29/month. We tested the self-hosted option, which requires server infrastructure but has no ongoing software fees.

Support: Community support via GitHub and Discord; cloud plans include direct support.

"We needed document tracking that didn't send our data to third parties. Papermark solved this perfectly." — CTO, Healthcare Startup, GitHub

5. Pitch - For real-time presentation collaboration

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.6/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.7/5 ⭐

We tried Pitch because it approaches presentations differently - collaboration first, tracking second. Pitch offers real-time team editing on presentations, beautiful templates, and viewer analytics. What stood out was how it handles creating decks as a team, not just sharing finished ones.

HelpRange vs Pitch

Why design-focused teams love it

When we tested this with a team, the real-time collaboration felt like Google Slides but with better design tools. We found this particularly useful when testing scenarios where multiple people need to build decks together before sharing externally.

The templates are genuinely well-designed. In our testing, the ability to maintain brand consistency across team members stood out. The viewer analytics show who looked at your presentation and for how long, similar to other tracking tools.

For teams that create many presentations, Pitch handles both the creation workflow and the sharing analytics. You build, refine, and track all in one place.

Best For: Teams that need to collaborate on creating presentations, not just track existing ones.

Pricing: Free for basic features; Pro at $8/user/month. We tested the Pro plan, which includes unlimited presentations and advanced analytics.

Support: Email support and comprehensive help documentation. Quick response times on technical questions.

"Our team creates dozens of client presentations monthly. Pitch keeps everything branded and lets us see which slides resonate." — Creative Director, Agency, G2

6. Digify - For maximum document security features

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.4/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.3/5 ⭐

Digify focuses heavily on security. We tested it because some use cases need more than just analytics - they need watermarking, screenshot prevention, and strict access controls. Digify offers secure data rooms with features designed to prevent unauthorized sharing or leaking of sensitive documents.

HelpRange vs Digify

Why security-conscious teams love it

When we tested this with confidential documents, the watermarking feature adds the viewer's email to every page they see. We found this particularly useful when testing scenarios involving sensitive financial data or M&A documents.

The screenshot prevention works on most platforms, though nothing is completely foolproof. In our testing, the granular permission controls stood out - you can limit printing, set expiration dates, and revoke access remotely even after sharing.

The analytics show detailed engagement, but the real value is in the security layers. For legal teams, investors, or anyone sharing truly confidential materials, these features matter more than basic tracking.

Best For: Teams sharing highly confidential documents that need security beyond standard password protection.

Pricing: Starts at $49/month for Team plan; Business at $129/month. We tested the Team plan, which includes watermarking and basic security features.

Support: Email and chat support; security-focused knowledge base with compliance documentation.

"We needed to share acquisition documents with multiple parties. Digify's watermarking gave us peace of mind." — Corporate Development, Financial Services, Capterra

7. BriefLink - For minimalist link tracking

Ratings and Reviews: Product Hunt: 4.5/5 ⭐ | Building review presence

BriefLink takes the opposite approach from feature-heavy platforms. We tested it because sometimes you just need simple link tracking without complexity. BriefLink offers straightforward analytics for shared links - see who clicked, when, and from where. The interface is minimal and focused.

HelpRange vs BriefLink

Why minimalists love it

When we tested this with various document types, the setup was incredibly fast. We found this particularly useful when testing quick sharing scenarios where you need basic confirmation someone viewed your materials.

The analytics are simple - you see clicks, timing, and basic engagement. In our testing, the lack of complexity stood out as the main feature. No learning curve, no enterprise features you won't use, just tracking that works.

For solo founders or small teams that don't need advanced features, BriefLink does one thing well. You share a link, you see who clicked it, done.

Best For: Individuals or small teams wanting simple tracking without feature overload.

Pricing: Starts at $29/month for unlimited tracking. We tested the standard plan, which covers all core features.

Support: Email support; minimal documentation needed due to simple interface.

"I don't need 50 features. BriefLink tracks my shared documents and that's exactly what I wanted." — Freelance Consultant, Solo Professional, Product Hunt

Cheapest HelpRange alternatives

If you're watching costs carefully, several low-price alternatives offer solid document tracking and basic analytics:

1. Ellty

Ellty starts at $0 for basic pitch deck sharing with viewer analytics. The free tier gives you trackable links and basic engagement data. Pro at $24/month and Business at $50/month add unlimited decks, detailed analytics, and virtual data room features.

For fundraising specifically, Ellty focuses on what founders actually need - quick setup, clear analytics on investor engagement, and data rooms for due diligence. The flat-rate pricing means no surprises as you share with more investors or add team members.

The interface is straightforward by design. Upload your deck, generate a shareable link, see who viewed which slides and when. Real-time notifications tell you immediately when someone opens your materials. If you need pitch deck tracking without complexity, the free plan works fine for initial testing.

2. BriefLink

At $29/month for unlimited documents, BriefLink is simple and affordable. You get basic page-by-page analytics and sharing links. No team features, no virtual data room, but for individuals tracking document engagement, it works.

The interface is bare-bones on purpose. Upload a file, get a link, see who viewed which pages. That's it. If you need collaboration features or advanced security, you'll need to look elsewhere, but you won't find a simpler way to track basic document views.

3. Papermark (Self-hosted)

Free if you self-host, Papermark offers document tracking without ongoing subscription costs. You need technical knowledge to set up and maintain the infrastructure, but the software itself costs nothing.

The cloud-hosted version starts at €29/month if you want Papermark's privacy-first approach without managing servers yourself. Good for teams with strict data control requirements who don't want to pay enterprise prices.

How we chose which HelpRange alternative to recommend

After testing all these alternatives, here's what we'd consider if we were choosing for our own business:

Your use case matters most. Are you fundraising and need pitch deck analytics? Ellty handles this specifically. Running a sales team that creates proposals? PandaDoc makes more sense. Need maximum security for M&A documents? Look at Digify. We found that the "best" tool depends entirely on what you're actually doing with your documents.

Budget and team size affect your options. Per-user pricing from tools like DocSend and PandaDoc scales differently than flat-rate options from Ellty or BriefLink. For small teams, per-user fees might not matter. For growing companies, we noticed the math changes quickly. Calculate what you'd pay at your current size and in six months.

Technical requirements can narrow choices fast. If you need specific integrations with Salesforce or HubSpot, DocSend offers these out of the box. If you have strict data residency requirements, Papermark's self-hosted option might be your only choice. Some tools took hours to integrate properly, others worked immediately.

Analytics needs vary more than you'd think. Do you need detailed page-by-page insights or just confirmation someone opened your document? If you're fundraising, analytics like time-on-page and return visits help you time follow-ups. If you're just sharing basic materials, simple click tracking might be enough. We tested scenarios for both - the depth you need determines which platform works.

Support and reliability matter when you're on a deadline. We tested support responsiveness across platforms. Response times ranged from minutes to days. Onboarding help varies too - some tools leave you to figure things out, others walk you through setup. For time-sensitive sharing like investor deadlines, this matters.

Common questions about HelpRange alternatives (from our testing)

What is HelpRange best known for?

HelpRange built its reputation on document tracking and viewer analytics. The platform focuses on showing you exactly who viewed your documents, which pages they spent time on, and when they engaged. Many sales teams and agencies use it for tracking proposals, presentations, and client materials. The interface is clean and the analytics are reliable.

Why do businesses look for HelpRange alternatives?

Based on our conversations with users, the main reasons are pricing structure as teams grow, need for specialized features like e-signatures or data rooms, preference for tools built specifically for certain use cases like fundraising, or wanting simpler options without enterprise complexity. Some teams also look for alternatives when they need specific integrations HelpRange doesn't offer.

Are these alternatives cheaper than HelpRange?

It depends on your team size and needs. Ellty's flat-rate pricing ($24-$50/month) can be cheaper than per-user models if you have a growing team. BriefLink at $29/month offers basic tracking at a lower price point. However, tools like DocSend and PandaDoc might cost more but include additional features like e-signatures or integrations. We found that "cheaper" depends on what features you actually use - paying less for a tool that doesn't meet your needs isn't a real savings.

Which alternative is best for early-stage startups?

From our testing, Ellty works well for founders focused on fundraising. The setup is fast, the pricing doesn't scale with team size, and the pitch deck analytics are relevant. Papermark is technically free if you self-host, but requires technical setup. Pitch offers generous free tiers if you're creating presentations collaboratively. For startups, we'd prioritize quick setup and relevant features over enterprise capabilities you won't use yet.

Do I need a virtual data room for fundraising?

Not for initial conversations, but yes once investors get serious. We found that early pitching just needs basic tracking - you want to know if they viewed your deck. Once you're in due diligence, investors will request financials, legal documents, and detailed company information. Having a data room ready (from Ellty, DocSend, or Digify) speeds this process up. Setting one up takes time, so preparing early helps.

Can I switch from HelpRange to another tool easily?

Switching document tracking tools is straightforward - you're mostly just changing where you upload and share from. The analytics history won't transfer, but that's usually not critical. In our testing, we moved the same documents across platforms in under an hour. The harder part is changing team habits and updating any shared links. If you've integrated HelpRange with other tools, you'll need to reconfigure those connections.

What's the difference between HelpRange and DocSend?

Both offer document tracking and analytics, but DocSend leans heavier into enterprise features and integrations. DocSend is owned by Dropbox and integrates deeply with enterprise sales tools like Salesforce. HelpRange focuses more on straightforward tracking without as many integration requirements. In our testing, DocSend felt built for larger sales teams, while HelpRange works well for smaller teams needing solid analytics without enterprise complexity.

Our final thoughts on HelpRange alternatives

After weeks of testing these tools, we found that the document tracking landscape offers real variety in approaches. No single "best" tool exists - it depends entirely on whether you're fundraising, running sales, creating proposals, or sharing confidential materials.

We found Ellty great for startup founders focused on pitch deck sharing and fundraising workflows, while DocSend suited enterprise sales teams with existing CRM infrastructure. PandaDoc made sense for teams needing the full proposal-to-signature workflow, and Papermark fit organizations with strict data control requirements. Pitch worked well for teams collaborating on presentations, Digify for security-focused sharing, and BriefLink for minimalist tracking needs.

Choose based on your actual workflow, not just features. We tested scenarios across fundraising, sales, and general business sharing - the tool that works best handles your specific use case well, not necessarily the one with the most features.

Whether you go with Ellty for pitch deck analytics and quick data room setup or DocSend for enterprise integrations, pick what actually solves your problems. Test the platforms yourself with real documents - most offer free trials or starter plans. You'll know quickly if the interface makes sense for your team and whether the analytics provide the insights you need.

Disclaimer

Parties other than Ellty may provide products, services, recommendations, or views on this site ("Third Party Materials"). Ellty is not responsible for examining or evaluating such Third Party Materials, and does not provide any warranties relating to the Third Party Materials. Links to such Third Party Materials are for your convenience and does not constitute an endorsement of such Third Party Materials.