Datasite alternatives we've personally tried and compared - 2026

Datasite is one of the established names in virtual data rooms and deal management software. It's built for complex M&A transactions, due diligence, and enterprise deals. Plenty of investment banks and large corporations rely on it.

We spent the last few months testing alternatives to Datasite because we wanted to understand what's available beyond enterprise-focused platforms. Some businesses need the full power of Datasite's deal suite. Others just need secure document sharing with good analytics. And many startups can't justify enterprise pricing when they're raising their seed round.

The common reasons we heard for exploring alternatives: pricing structure (Datasite typically requires custom quotes and can run high), setup complexity for smaller teams, and feature overlap (not everyone needs Bloomberg integration or multi-billion-dollar deal workflows). Some teams want something simpler. Others need specific features Datasite doesn't emphasize, like pitch deck analytics or lightweight collaboration.

We've personally tested 10 alternatives across different price points and use cases. Some are purpose-built for M&A like Datasite. Others focus on fundraising, secure file sharing, or general document management. We tried uploading documents, setting permissions, tracking analytics, and comparing what each platform actually delivers versus what it promises. Here's what we discovered.

Key takeaways

Why look for a Datasite alternative?

Datasite handles enterprise virtual data rooms and complex M&A transactions well. The platform provides extensive security certifications, detailed audit trails, and deal management features that large transactions require. For billion-dollar acquisitions and regulatory-heavy deals, that infrastructure matters.

But Datasite isn't the only option, and it's not always the best fit for every deal.

Better features for the price

Several alternatives offer proper virtual data room functionality without enterprise pricing complexity. Mid-market platforms like Firmex start at $500/month with transparent project-based pricing - no custom quotes, no per-user fees that scale unpredictably. We found tools like iDeals that prioritize ease of use, reducing setup time from weeks to days.

Some alternatives include features Datasite doesn't emphasize. Ellty focuses specifically on fundraising with pitch deck analytics that matter for investor conversations. DealRoom adds pipeline management for teams juggling multiple deals. Ansarada brings AI-driven insights that predict bidder engagement. The right alternative depends on whether you need Datasite's full enterprise feature set or something more focused.

For startups and mid-market deals, enterprise platforms create unnecessary overhead. You're paying for Bloomberg integrations and multi-billion-dollar deal workflows you'll never use. Alternatives built for your market segment deliver what you actually need without the complexity.

Different workflow needs

Datasite focuses on enterprise M&A with extensive compliance and deal management capabilities. That's essential if you're managing a complex acquisition with multiple bidders, regulatory requirements, and cross-border complications.

But if you're raising a Series A, you don't need that depth. Founders benefit more from platforms like Ellty that track which investors engage with pitch materials and provide simple data rooms for due diligence. The analytics answer different questions - not "which bidder accessed which document" but "did this VC actually read our financials?"

Some teams need lighter tools without multi-week onboarding processes. Others need flexible platforms like Caplinked that adapt to real estate syndication or asset management instead of forcing everything into M&A templates. And professional services firms managing ongoing client relationships benefit from portal systems like ShareFile rather than transaction-focused VDRs.

The right alternative depends on your deal type, company size, and whether you need specialized enterprise features or just secure document sharing with good tracking.

Cost considerations

Datasite's pricing requires custom quotes and typically makes sense only for large enterprise transactions. For mid-market deals, fundraising rounds, or smaller businesses, the cost doesn't align with the value delivered.

We found alternatives with transparent pricing that eliminate sales calls just to learn basic costs. Firmex and Caplinked publish starting prices. Ellty offers a free tier with paid plans at $24/month and $50/month - accessible for early-stage startups watching every dollar.

Enterprise platforms charge for capabilities most deals don't use. If you're not managing a regulated financial transaction or multi-billion-dollar acquisition, you're paying for infrastructure you don't need. Mid-market and fundraising-focused alternatives provide proper security and tracking without enterprise overhead.

Team size affects costs differently across platforms. Per-user pricing from tools like Box or ShareFile scales predictably for organizations already using those systems. Project-based pricing from Firmex makes sense for occasional deals. Flat-rate plans from Ellty eliminate per-user fees entirely as your team grows.

Datasite alternatives overview

Here are the best Datasite alternatives in 2026 for any business (in our opinion)

What are the best Datasite alternatives?

The best Datasite alternative depends on what kind of deal you're actually running.

For startup fundraising: Ellty gives you what founders actually need - pitch deck sharing, page-by-page analytics, simple data rooms for due diligence. Upload your materials, share trackable links, see which investors engage. No enterprise onboarding, no custom pricing calls, just fast setup and clear tracking. Works for seed through Series A without the overhead.

For M&A pipeline management: DealRoom when you're juggling multiple deals simultaneously. Track where each transaction sits, assign diligence tasks to team members, manage Q&A alongside document sharing. The data room is there, but you're getting deal workflow tools that pure VDR platforms don't offer. Good for corporate development teams running several processes at once.

For mid-market deals: Firmex or iDeals when you need proper virtual data room features without enterprise complexity. Firmex does per-project pricing starting at $500/month - no per-user fees, no page charges. iDeals focuses on ease of use so clients navigate without hand-holding. Both handle M&A due diligence competently without the learning curve or cost of Datasite.

For AI-driven insights: Ansarada when you want automation and predictive analytics. The platform suggests how to organize documents, scores bidder engagement, flags missing materials. Takes longer to learn but gives you deal intelligence beyond basic tracking. Investment banks and advisors managing complex sell-side processes benefit most.

For enterprise transactions: Intralinks when you need Datasite-level security and compliance but prefer a different vendor. Similar feature depth, similar pricing, similar target market. The choice comes down to existing relationships or minor feature preferences rather than fundamental capabilities. Both handle multi-billion dollar deals and regulatory requirements.

For flexible workflows: Caplinked when your data room needs don't fit standard M&A templates. Real estate syndication, ongoing investor relations, asset management - customize permissions and workflows to match your process. More versatile than transaction-focused platforms, less specialized for complex M&A.

For existing infrastructure: Box if your company already uses it enterprise-wide. Add secure sharing with watermarking and audit trails without introducing new platforms. Works for straightforward deals where you value using approved systems over specialized VDR features. Falls short for serious M&A compared to purpose-built tools.

For ongoing client portals: ShareFile when you need persistent secure spaces, not one-off transactions. Law firms, accountants, consultants exchanging documents continuously with clients. Built-in e-signatures, designed for relationships rather than deals. Wrong tool for M&A, right tool for professional services.

For simplified Datasite: Merrill DataSite One when you want the Datasite brand and security but your deal doesn't need the full platform. Same parent company, streamlined features, faster setup. Makes sense if you're familiar with Datasite and working on a smaller transaction.

Different deal types, different requirements. Datasite excels at complex enterprise M&A. These alternatives either serve different markets (fundraising, mid-market, ongoing portals) or compete directly with different approaches. Pick based on transaction complexity, budget reality, and whether you need specialized deal features or just secure document sharing.

Types of Datasite alternatives

Datasite alternatives fall into different categories based on what they're actually built to handle.

Enterprise virtual data rooms - Direct Datasite competitors. Intralinks and Ansarada sit here. Built for large M&A transactions, capital markets deals, complex cross-border scenarios. Extensive compliance certifications, deal-specific workflows, enterprise security infrastructure. Custom pricing, dedicated support, onboarding processes. You're paying for capabilities that billion-dollar transactions require. Overkill for mid-market deals, necessary for enterprise complexity.

Mid-market VDR platforms - Scaled-down functionality with accessible pricing. Firmex, iDeals, and Caplinked focus here. Proper virtual data rooms with due diligence features, Q&A management, audit trails - just without the enterprise bells and whistles most deals don't use. Per-project pricing or transparent tiers instead of custom quotes. Faster setup than enterprise platforms. Perfect for deals in the millions, not billions.

Deal management systems - More than document storage. DealRoom combines data rooms with pipeline tracking and project management. You're managing multiple transactions simultaneously, assigning tasks, tracking deal stages. The VDR is one component of broader deal workflow tools. Good for corporate development teams or M&A advisors juggling several processes. Different problem than Datasite solves.

Fundraising-focused platforms - Built specifically for startup capital raising. Ellty fits here. Pitch deck analytics, investor tracking, lightweight data rooms for due diligence. Not trying to handle $500M acquisitions - solving for founders who need to share materials with VCs and track engagement. Fast setup, low cost, analytics that matter for fundraising conversations. Wrong tool for M&A, right tool for Series A.

Simplified enterprise offerings - Streamlined versions of full platforms. Merrill DataSite One does this for Datasite itself. Same security infrastructure and brand trust, fewer features, faster deployment. Targets mid-market deals where you want enterprise credibility without enterprise complexity. Still requires working with enterprise sales processes.

Enterprise content management - General-purpose platforms with VDR-like features. Box and ShareFile. Primary use is company-wide file sharing and collaboration, but security controls support data room scenarios. Makes sense when you're already paying for enterprise deployment and want to leverage existing infrastructure. Lacks specialized deal features but reduces platform sprawl.

Client portal systems - Ongoing secure workspaces, not transaction-focused. ShareFile emphasizes this. Professional services firms managing continuous client relationships - file exchange, e-signatures, discussions. Built for persistent portals where the same clients access materials repeatedly. Completely wrong for M&A due diligence, perfect for law firms and accountants with recurring secure sharing needs.

Niche workflow platforms - Specialized for specific industries or deal types. Caplinked's flexibility lets it serve real estate syndication, asset management, varied use cases beyond traditional M&A. You're customizing workflows to match your process rather than fitting into standard templates. Broader than pure VDRs, less deep on M&A-specific features.

Different categories solve different problems. Datasite sits squarely in enterprise VDR territory with extensive M&A focus. These alternatives either compete in the same space with different approaches, serve different market segments (mid-market, fundraising), or solve adjacent problems (ongoing portals, deal pipelines). The right category depends on your transaction type, company size, and whether you need specialized deal tools or just secure document sharing with tracking.

Quick comparison: Datasite alternatives at a glance

We tested each of these tools ourselves. Below, we'll break down what we found - the good, the specific use cases, and who each one works best for.

1. Ellty - For pitch deck sharing and fundraising analytics

Ratings and Reviews: G2: Recently launched - early users highlight fast setup and clear analytics

We tried Ellty early in our testing because we wanted something built specifically for startup fundraising rather than enterprise M&A. Ellty offers pitch deck sharing, link tracking, and virtual data room features designed for founders raising capital. What we appreciated most was how quickly we got set up - we uploaded a pitch deck and had a trackable link in under two minutes.

Datasite vs Ellty

Why fundraising teams love it

When we tested this with a sample pitch deck, we uploaded the file, created a shareable link, and immediately saw which pages investors viewed and how long they spent on each slide. This matters when you're trying to understand if investors are actually reading your financials or just skimming the deck.

We found this particularly useful for founders who need data room functionality without enterprise complexity. You can organize documents into folders, set different permission levels, and get notified in real-time when someone views your materials. Founders we talked to mentioned using it to track investor interest - if someone spends 10 minutes on your deck versus 30 seconds, that tells you something.

In our testing, the analytics stood out because they're focused on what matters for fundraising: who's engaged, which sections interest them, and when to follow up. It's not trying to be Datasite. It's solving a different problem for a different audience.

Best For: Startup founders who need pitch deck analytics and simple virtual data rooms for seed through Series A fundraising.

Pricing: Free basic tier with limited features. Pro plan at $24/month includes detailed analytics and custom branding. Business plan at $50/month adds team collaboration and advanced permissions. We tested the Pro plan, which gave us everything we needed for tracking investor engagement.

Support: Email and chat support available. Documentation covers common fundraising scenarios. We got responses within a few hours when we tested support with setup questions.

"The analytics show exactly who opened our deck and which slides they focused on. Made follow-ups so much easier during our seed round." - Startup Founder, Early-stage, Product Hunt

Try Ellty if you need straightforward pitch deck tracking without the overhead of enterprise data room platforms. You can test the free tier to see if the analytics fit your fundraising workflow.

2. DealRoom - For M&A pipeline and project management

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.5/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.6/5 ⭐

DealRoom combines virtual data room functionality with M&A project management. We tested it because it positions itself as more than just document storage - it's built to manage the entire deal lifecycle from pipeline to close.

Datasite vs DealRoom

Why M&A teams love it

When we uploaded documents and set up a test deal room, what immediately stood out was the pipeline view. Instead of just housing documents, DealRoom lets you see all your deals in progress, assign tasks to team members, and track which stage each transaction is in. This matters for corporate development teams juggling multiple potential acquisitions.

We found the diligence request management particularly useful. Buyers can submit requests, you can assign them to team members, and everyone sees the status in real-time. It's less about replacing Datasite's document security and more about organizing the chaos of managing several deals simultaneously.

In our testing, teams already using dedicated project management tools might find overlap with what DealRoom offers. But if you want deal-specific workflows and data room features in one platform, it handles that combination well. The learning curve is steeper than simple data rooms, but you're getting more functionality.

Best For: Corporate development teams and M&A advisors managing multiple deals who need pipeline visibility and project management alongside data room features.

Pricing: Custom pricing based on number of deals and users. DealRoom typically works with mid-market and enterprise clients. In our research, pricing starts around several thousand per year but varies significantly based on usage.

Support: Dedicated account management for clients, with onboarding support. Knowledge base and training resources available. Users report responsive support teams.

"DealRoom changed how we manage our acquisition pipeline. Having everything in one place - documents, tasks, and deal stage - eliminated so much back-and-forth." - VP of Corporate Development, Mid-market Company, G2

3. Firmex - For controlled document sharing with per-project pricing

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.1/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.4/5 ⭐ | Trustpilot: 4.3/5 ⭐

Firmex markets itself as a straightforward virtual data room without the complexity of enterprise platforms. We tested it to see how it compares for teams that need secure document sharing but not necessarily full deal management suites.

Datasite vs Firmex

Why mid-market teams love it

When we set up a test data room in Firmex, the process was more straightforward than enterprise platforms. Upload documents, organize into folders, set user permissions, and share access. No Bloomberg integration or complex deal workflows, just secure document sharing with good tracking.

We found the per-project pricing model helpful for companies that don't do deals constantly. You're not paying for seats you don't use or committing to annual enterprise contracts. For a specific transaction - selling a division, raising a round, conducting due diligence - you spin up a project and pay for that period.

In our testing, the permission controls worked well. You can restrict printing, set expiration dates on access, and watermark documents. The Q&A feature lets buyers ask questions within the platform rather than through scattered emails. It's not trying to compete with Datasite on feature count, but it handles the core data room needs competently.

Best For: Mid-market M&A transactions, real estate deals, and legal proceedings where you need secure document sharing without enterprise platform overhead.

Pricing: Starts at $500/month per project with unlimited users and documents. Custom pricing for larger or longer-term projects. We found the project-based model more predictable than per-user pricing when team sizes fluctuate.

Support: 24/7 phone and email support. Setup assistance included. Users consistently mention helpful support teams in reviews.

"We've used Firmex for multiple transactions. Pricing is transparent, setup is quick, and support actually helps when you need them. Does what we need without unnecessary features." - M&A Advisor, Professional Services, Capterra

4. Ansarada - For AI-powered deal preparation

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.5/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.3/5 ⭐

Ansarada focuses on AI and automation for deal preparation and execution. We tested it because it takes a different approach than traditional data rooms - emphasizing readiness and insights over just document storage.

Datasite vs Ansarada

Why deal teams love it

When we uploaded a set of documents to test Ansarada, the AI started suggesting how to organize them and flagging potential gaps in our materials. This matters when you're preparing for due diligence and might not realize you're missing standard documents buyers expect.

We found the bidder engagement scoring interesting. Ansarada analyzes how different potential buyers interact with your data room - which documents they view, how long they spend, questions they ask - and gives you insights about who's seriously interested versus just browsing. For sell-side advisors managing multiple bidders, this helps prioritize where to focus energy.

In our testing, the automation features saved time on repetitive tasks. Setting up standard permission groups, generating common reports, and organizing documents by category happened faster than manual setup. The trade-off is complexity - Ansarada has more features to learn than simpler platforms, but you're getting more analytical capability.

Best For: Investment banks, M&A advisors, and corporate development teams that want AI-driven insights and deal automation alongside data room functionality.

Pricing: Custom pricing based on deal size and features needed. Ansarada typically works with mid-market to enterprise deals. Based on user reports, expect pricing comparable to other enterprise data room providers.

Support: Dedicated support team with onboarding and training. Users mention responsive customer success managers who help optimize platform usage.

"Ansarada's AI flagged documents we were missing before buyers even asked. The bidder engagement insights helped us focus on serious offers instead of tire-kickers." - Investment Banker, Financial Services, G2

5. Intralinks - For established enterprise security

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.2/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.3/5 ⭐

Intralinks is one of the longest-running virtual data room providers, competing directly with Datasite in the enterprise market. We tested it to understand what differentiates the established enterprise platforms.

Datasite vs Intralinks

Why enterprise teams love it

When we explored Intralinks for a test scenario, the security and compliance features are immediately apparent. This platform is built for deals where regulatory requirements, cross-border data protection, and audit trails matter critically. If you're managing a multi-billion dollar acquisition or a complex capital markets transaction, these features justify the investment.

We found the global infrastructure relevant for international deals. Intralinks has data centers worldwide, which means better performance for teams accessing data rooms from different continents. When your buyers are in Asia, Europe, and the Americas, platform speed and reliability across regions becomes important.

In our testing, Intralinks and Datasite occupy similar territory. Both are enterprise-grade, both require significant investment, both offer extensive features. Choosing between them often comes down to existing relationships, specific industry requirements, or which platform your advisors recommend. Users we talked to mentioned that both work well - the decision is rarely about capabilities and more about fit with existing workflows.

Best For: Large enterprise M&A, capital markets transactions, and complex cross-border deals requiring extensive compliance and security certifications.

Pricing: Custom enterprise pricing based on transaction size, duration, and features. Expect pricing comparable to Datasite - these platforms target the same market segment.

Support: 24/7 global support teams. Dedicated account management for enterprise clients. Extensive training and onboarding resources.

"We've used Intralinks for years across multiple transactions. Rock-solid security, global performance, and support teams that understand complex deal requirements." - General Counsel, Enterprise Corporation, G2

6. Caplinked - For workflow-driven virtual data rooms

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.5/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.5/5 ⭐

Caplinked positions itself as a more flexible and customizable data room platform. We tested it because of its focus on workflows and permissions that adapt to different use cases beyond just M&A.

Datasite vs Caplinked

Why diverse teams love it

When we set up test scenarios in Caplinked, the platform lets you configure workflows that match your specific process. Not just M&A due diligence - we tested scenarios for real estate syndication, venture fundraising, and asset management. The permission system lets you create custom roles beyond standard buyer/seller categories.

We found this particularly useful for teams that need data rooms for purposes other than traditional M&A. Real estate firms managing investor communications, asset managers sharing portfolio updates, or companies conducting ongoing compliance work can configure Caplinked to match their workflows rather than forcing their process into M&A-centric templates.

In our testing, the setup was more approachable than enterprise platforms. You can get started without extensive onboarding, though complex configurations benefit from their support team's help. The trade-off versus Datasite is depth of M&A-specific features - Caplinked is broader but less specialized for complex enterprise transactions.

Best For: Teams needing flexible virtual data rooms for varied use cases - real estate syndication, ongoing investor relations, asset management, and mid-market M&A.

Pricing: Starts at $495/month for standard plans with clear tier structure. Custom pricing for enterprise needs. We appreciated transparent pricing versus platforms requiring sales calls for basic information.

Support: Email and phone support during business hours. Setup assistance and training resources included. Users report helpful support for configuration questions.

"We use Caplinked for multiple real estate projects simultaneously. The ability to customize permissions and workflows for different investor groups is exactly what we needed." - Real Estate Developer, Commercial Real Estate, Capterra

7. iDeals - For user-friendly mid-market M&A

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.7/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.8/5 ⭐ | Trustpilot: 4.6/5 ⭐

iDeals emphasizes user-friendly design for virtual data rooms. We tested it because reviews consistently mention ease of use, which matters when you're working with clients or counterparties who aren't data room experts.

Datasite vs iDeals

Why mid-market advisors love it

When we tested iDeals with a simulated due diligence scenario, the interface felt cleaner and less overwhelming than enterprise platforms. This matters when you're sharing access with clients who don't live in data rooms daily. Less time explaining how to navigate the platform means more time on actual deal work.

We found the Q&A management and document indexing straightforward. Upload your diligence materials, iDeals helps organize them logically, and buyers can navigate without constant guidance. The reporting shows you exactly who accessed which documents and when, which is essential for tracking diligence progress.

In our testing, iDeals fits the middle ground between simple file sharing and full enterprise platforms. You get proper security, audit trails, and due diligence features without the complexity or cost of Datasite. The trade-off is fewer specialized features for very large or complex transactions, but most mid-market deals don't need those extras.

Best For: Mid-market M&A advisors, private equity firms, and corporate development teams that prioritize ease of use and faster deployment over extensive enterprise features.

Pricing: Custom pricing based on project scope. User reports suggest competitive mid-market pricing, typically lower than Datasite for comparable functionality. Free trial available to test the platform.

Support: 24/7 multilingual support. Users consistently praise response times and helpfulness in reviews. Training and onboarding included.

"iDeals is intuitive enough that our clients figure it out without hand-holding. Support is incredibly responsive, and pricing is fair for the features you get." - M&A Advisor, Financial Services, G2

8. Merrill DataSite One - For simplified Datasite experience

Ratings and Reviews: Capterra: 4.0/5 ⭐ (limited reviews as newer offering)

Merrill DataSite One is the parent company's answer to simpler, more accessible data room needs. We tested it because it's positioned as Datasite's streamlined version for smaller deals.

Datasite vs DataSite One

Why smaller deal teams love it

When we explored DataSite One, it's clearly designed to bring Datasite's core security and reliability to deals that don't need the full enterprise platform. Same company, same security infrastructure, but without features most mid-market deals won't use.

We found this relevant for teams familiar with Datasite who want the brand trust and security posture but are working on smaller transactions. If you've used Datasite before and liked it, but your current deal doesn't justify enterprise pricing or complexity, DataSite One gives you a path to stay in the same ecosystem.

In our testing, this makes sense if you value Datasite's reputation and security but need something more accessible. The trade-off is you're still working with Merrill's sales process rather than transparent online pricing, and you'll have fewer features than platforms built specifically for mid-market from the start.

Best For: Teams familiar with Datasite working on mid-market transactions who want simplified access to the same security infrastructure without full enterprise complexity.

Pricing: Custom pricing, positioned as more accessible than full Datasite platform. Contact Merrill for quotes based on specific deal parameters.

Support: Leverages Merrill's support infrastructure. Users expect similar quality to main Datasite platform with potentially faster setup for simpler use cases.

Based on limited user feedback and documentation, DataSite One fills a specific niche - Datasite's brand and security for teams that don't need the full platform.

9. Box - For enterprise content management with data room capabilities

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.2/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.4/5 ⭐ | Trustpilot: 1.7/5 ⭐

Box is primarily enterprise content management and file sharing, but offers features that work for certain data room scenarios. We tested it because some teams already use Box and wonder if it can replace specialized VDR platforms.

Datasite vs Box

Why existing Box users love it

When we tested Box for a data room scenario, it works if your needs are straightforward secure file sharing with tracking. You can create shared folders with specific permissions, watermark documents, set expiration dates, and track who accessed files. For teams already paying for Box enterprise, this adds data room-like capability without new platforms.

We found Box most relevant when the transaction isn't highly complex and you value using existing infrastructure. If your company already has Box deployed, security teams have approved it, and users know how to use it, adding a data room workflow makes sense for certain deals. The collaboration features - commenting, version control, workflow automation - can actually be more advanced than specialized VDR platforms.

In our testing, Box falls short for serious M&A due diligence compared to Datasite. You don't get the same deal-specific analytics, Q&A management, or buyer engagement tracking. But for fundraising document sharing, ongoing investor relations, or simpler transactions where you need secure sharing with audit trails, Box handles it if you're already in their ecosystem.

Best For: Enterprises already using Box that need secure document sharing for straightforward transactions or ongoing secure collaboration rather than complex M&A.

Pricing: Business plan from $20/user/month. Enterprise plan with advanced security and compliance features requires custom pricing. We tested with Business Plus tier, which provided necessary security controls.

Support: 24/7 support for enterprise customers. Box has extensive documentation and active community. Support quality varies in user reviews.

"We use Box for everything already, so for our Series A fundraising we just created a secure folder instead of buying another platform. Worked fine for our needs." - Startup Operations, Technology Company, G2

10. ShareFile - For secure client document exchange

Ratings and Reviews: G2: 4.2/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.5/5 ⭐ | Trustpilot: 1.4/5 ⭐

ShareFile, owned by Citrix, focuses on secure file sharing and client portals. We tested it because it's positioned for professional services firms that need ongoing secure client communication, not just one-off transactions.

Datasite vs ShareFile

Why professional services firms love it

When we set up a test client portal in ShareFile, it's designed for ongoing relationships rather than single transactions. Law firms, accounting firms, and consultants that continuously exchange sensitive documents with clients benefit from persistent portals where each client has secure access to their materials.

We found the e-signature integration useful for workflows requiring document signing alongside secure sharing. Instead of coordinating separate platforms for sharing and signing, ShareFile handles both. The client-facing experience is cleaner than giving external parties access to internal file systems.

In our testing, ShareFile makes sense for service providers with ongoing client document needs, not M&A transactions. You wouldn't use this for selling your company or managing due diligence - it lacks deal-specific features. But for tax document exchange, legal matter management, or consultant deliverables, it provides appropriate security with better ongoing usability than transaction-focused VDRs.

Best For: Professional services firms - legal, accounting, consulting - that need secure ongoing client portals and document exchange rather than deal-specific data rooms.

Pricing: Advanced plan from $17.60/user/month with core features. Premium plan with enhanced security and controls requires custom pricing. We tested the Advanced tier for secure client sharing scenarios.

Support: Phone and email support. ShareFile has documentation and training resources. Support responsiveness varies based on plan tier.

"ShareFile works perfectly for our client portal needs. Each client has their own secure space, and the e-signature integration saves us from juggling multiple platforms." - Managing Partner, Accounting Firm, Capterra

Most affordable Datasite alternatives

If you're watching costs carefully, several alternatives offer solid virtual data room features or secure sharing without enterprise pricing:

1. Ellty

Free tier for basic pitch deck sharing and analytics. Pro plan at $24/month includes detailed viewer tracking and custom branding. Business plan at $50/month adds team collaboration and advanced permissions. For startup fundraising and early-stage due diligence, this pricing makes sense when you're not ready for enterprise VDR costs.

You get page-by-page analytics, real-time notifications when investors view materials, and secure data rooms for organizing diligence documents. Not built for $500M acquisitions, but perfect for seed through Series A where you need investor tracking without complexity.

2. Box

Business plan from $20/user/month provides enterprise content management with security controls that work for simpler data room scenarios. If your company already uses Box, adding secure sharing workflows doesn't require new platform costs.

The catch: you don't get deal-specific analytics or VDR features. Good for straightforward document sharing with audit trails. Not good for serious M&A where you need Q&A management, bidder tracking, or transaction-focused workflows.

3. Caplinked

Starts at $495/month for project-based pricing with unlimited users and documents. Lower than enterprise VDR quotes, higher than basic sharing tools. You get proper virtual data room features - permissions management, audit trails, Q&A functionality - without Datasite's cost or complexity.

The interface is more customizable than rigid M&A platforms. Works for mid-market deals, real estate transactions, and varied use cases where you need secure document management but not full enterprise infrastructure.

How we chose which Datasite alternative to recommend

After testing all these alternatives, here's what we'd consider if we were choosing for our own business.

Your use case matters most. Are you managing a complex M&A transaction where Datasite's full feature set makes sense? Or are you raising a Series A and need simple pitch deck tracking? We found that most teams overestimate what they need. If you're doing a straightforward fundraising round, platforms like Ellty or Firmex handle it without enterprise complexity. Save Datasite, Intralinks, and Ansarada for actual enterprise transactions.

Budget and deal frequency affect the decision. Per-user pricing like Box or ShareFile makes sense if you're using the platform constantly across your organization. Per-project pricing like Firmex works better for occasional deals. Custom enterprise quotes from Datasite or Intralinks only justify themselves for large, complex transactions. For small teams working on a seed round, free or low-cost options like Ellty provide what you need without the overhead.

Think about who's using the platform. If you're sharing with first-time founders or clients unfamiliar with data rooms, ease of use becomes critical. We found iDeals and Ellty easier to navigate than enterprise platforms. Less time teaching people how to find documents means more time on actual business. Datasite makes sense when everyone involved is sophisticated and the transaction complexity demands it.

Analytics requirements vary widely. Fundraising teams care about different metrics than M&A advisors. If you need to know which investors spent time on your financials versus which ones barely opened your deck, Ellty analytics address that specifically. M&A deal teams need different insights - bidder engagement scoring from Ansarada or pipeline management from DealRoom. Match the analytics to what you're actually trying to understand.

Integration needs matter for existing workflows. If you're already deep in the Box or Microsoft ecosystem, leveraging those platforms for simpler secure sharing reduces platform sprawl. For specialized M&A work, purpose-built tools like Datasite or Firmex integrate with the systems investment banks and legal teams actually use. We tested integration scenarios and found that forcing platforms to connect when they're not designed for it causes more friction than using the right tool from the start.

Support and reliability become critical under deadline pressure. When you're closing a deal or trying to get investor signatures before a deadline, platform issues or slow support responses kill deals. We tested support response times and found significant variation. Enterprise platforms charge more but provide dedicated support. Lower-cost options work fine until you need help urgently - then you appreciate responsive support teams.

Common questions about Datasite alternatives (from our testing)

What is Datasite best known for?

Datasite is known for enterprise-grade virtual data rooms used in complex M&A transactions, capital raising, and restructuring. It's built for large deals involving investment banks, major corporations, and situations requiring extensive compliance, security certifications, and deal management workflows. The platform has been around for decades and is trusted for high-stakes transactions where security and audit trails are critical.

Why do businesses look for Datasite alternatives?

From our testing and conversations with users, the main reasons are pricing, deal complexity mismatch, and feature needs. Datasite pricing requires custom quotes and typically makes sense for large enterprise transactions - it's overkill if you're raising a seed round or managing a mid-market deal. Some teams need simpler setup without extensive onboarding. Others want specific features Datasite doesn't emphasize, like pitch deck analytics for fundraising or lightweight client portals for ongoing use. Not every secure document sharing scenario requires enterprise VDR capabilities.

Are these alternatives cheaper than Datasite?

It depends on the alternative and your specific needs. Platforms like Ellty, Box, and ShareFile start at subscription pricing ($0 to $24/month range) that's significantly lower than enterprise VDR quotes. Mid-market options like Firmex and Caplinked ($495-500/month) cost less than Datasite for typical deals but more than basic tools. Enterprise alternatives like Intralinks and Ansarada price similarly to Datasite - you're not saving money, you're choosing based on features or existing relationships. We found that comparing pure dollar amounts misses the point - cheaper platforms work great for simpler needs but can't replace Datasite for complex enterprise transactions.

Which alternative is best for early-stage startups?

For fundraising specifically, we'd point early-stage startups to Ellty. Fast setup, pitch deck analytics that matter for investor conversations, and pricing that makes sense when you're watching every dollar. The free tier lets you test it, and the Pro plan at $24/month provides analytics without complicated data room workflows you don't need yet. If you're managing real due diligence for acquisition or later-stage fundraising, iDeals or Firmex provide more comprehensive VDR features while remaining accessible for teams without enterprise budgets.

Do I need a virtual data room for fundraising?

Not always, but it helps. For early conversations and initial pitches, secure file sharing or even email with NDAs works fine. Once investors get serious and start due diligence, having organized materials in a proper data room makes you look professional and lets you track engagement. We found that founders using data rooms could see which investors were actually digging into financials versus just skimming materials, which informed follow-up strategy. Tools like Ellty focus specifically on fundraising scenarios without forcing you into full M&A workflows.

Can I switch from Datasite to another tool easily?

Switching mid-transaction is complicated and risky - you'd need to migrate documents, reset permissions, retrain users, and potentially deal with counterparties who are already familiar with your current setup. For future deals, switching is straightforward. Export your documents from Datasite and upload to your new platform. The harder part is changing workflows and getting your team comfortable with different features. We'd recommend testing alternatives before committing to a switch, ideally starting with a new project rather than migrating an active deal.

What's the difference between Datasite and Intralinks?

Both are enterprise-grade virtual data room platforms with similar capabilities, pricing, and target markets. The differences are more about corporate ownership, specific feature implementations, and existing relationships than fundamental capabilities. Datasite is owned by Merrill Corporation, Intralinks by SS&C Technologies. In our testing, both handle complex M&A transactions well. Teams often choose based on what their investment bank or legal advisor recommends, existing corporate relationships, or minor feature preferences. You're not making a wrong choice picking either for enterprise deals - they're competing for the same use cases.

How important are security certifications for virtual data rooms?

Very important if you're handling sensitive M&A data, regulated information, or cross-border deals with data protection requirements. ISO 27001, SOC 2, and industry-specific certifications matter because they demonstrate the platform meets security standards and can handle compliance requirements. For enterprise transactions, your legal and IT teams will likely require specific certifications. For straightforward fundraising or simpler deals, basic security features like encryption, access controls, and audit logs from any reputable platform usually suffice. We found that teams overestimate certification needs for simple use cases while underestimating them for regulated industries.

Our final thoughts on Datasite alternatives

After weeks of testing these tools, the landscape of virtual data rooms and secure document sharing is broader than we expected. Datasite excels at what it's built for - complex enterprise M&A requiring extensive features, compliance, and support. But that's not every deal or every document sharing scenario.

We found tools optimized for specific needs work better than forcing everything into enterprise platforms. Ellty handles fundraising analytics simply and effectively. DealRoom focuses on deal pipeline management. Firmex targets mid-market with transparent pricing. iDeals prioritizes ease of use. Box and ShareFile serve teams already using those ecosystems. There's no single "best" tool - there's the right tool for your specific situation.

Choose based on your actual requirements, not aspirational ones. If you're raising a seed round, you don't need the same platform as a multi-billion dollar acquisition. If you're managing ongoing client portals, transaction-based VDRs are the wrong fit. If you are handling a complex enterprise deal, skimping on proper data room infrastructure creates more problems than it solves.

We found Ellty particularly effective for startup fundraising - the analytics help you understand investor engagement, setup takes minutes not days, and pricing makes sense for early-stage budgets. For mid-market M&A, iDeals and Firmex balance features with accessibility. Enterprise deals still benefit from platforms like Datasite, Intralinks, or Ansarada when complexity justifies the investment.

Whether you go with Ellty for pitch deck analytics or Firmex for mid-market deals or Datasite for enterprise transactions, pick what actually solves your problems. Test the platforms yourself if possible. Talk to teams with similar use cases. And remember that the best data room is the one people actually use properly, not the one with the most features.

Disclaimer

Parties other than Ellty may provide products, services, recommendations, or views on this site ("Third Party Materials"). Ellty is not responsible for examining or evaluating such Third Party Materials, and does not provide any warranties relating to the Third Party Materials. Links to such Third Party Materials are for your convenience and does not constitute an endorsement of such Third Party Materials.