Digify is solid for document sharing and tracking. Plenty of businesses use it for pitch decks, NDAs, and due diligence. The viewer analytics work well, and the interface is clean enough.
We've been testing alternatives to Digify for the past few months. Not because Digify is bad, but because different businesses need different things. Some need simpler setup, others want more detailed analytics, and a few are just looking for better pricing models that don't scale per user.
We've personally tested 9 alternatives. Some focus specifically on pitch deck sharing, others handle broader virtual data room needs, and a few just do document tracking without the overhead. Below, we'll break down what we found with each tool, who they work best for, and how they compare to Digify.
Digify handles secure document sharing well. The page-by-page analytics work, the watermarking features add security, and the interface is clean enough for most business use cases. For protecting sensitive documents and tracking who views them, it does what it promises.
But Digify isn't the only option, and it's not always the best fit for every business.
Several alternatives offer comparable security and analytics with additional features at similar or lower costs. Some include stronger virtual data room capabilities for due diligence. Others provide simpler interfaces that require less setup time and fewer clicks to share documents.
We found tools that offer flat-rate pricing instead of per-document or per-user fees, which saves money as your usage grows. Some alternatives include features like pitch deck analytics specifically for fundraising or workflow automation that Digify doesn't emphasize.
Digify focuses on document security and tracking across general business use cases. That's great if you need flexible document protection. But if you're specifically fundraising with pitch decks, managing M&A due diligence, or need integrated e-signature and contract workflows, you might benefit from a more specialized platform.
Some teams need simpler tools without learning about watermark settings and permission hierarchies. Others need deeper compliance features for regulated industries. The right alternative depends on what you're actually trying to accomplish.
Digify's pricing can add up for teams that share documents frequently. The plan tiers cap certain features like number of data rooms or documents. We found alternatives with more generous limits that make more sense for high-volume users, and others with free tiers that work fine for occasional pitch deck sharing.
Document limits also matter. Some alternatives offer unlimited document sharing where Digify caps features by plan tier. For businesses sharing dozens of documents monthly, this makes a real difference in actual costs.
We tested each of these tools ourselves over several weeks. Below, we'll break down what we found - the actual features, the specific use cases, and who each one works best for.
Here are the best Digify alternatives in 2026 for secure document sharing (in our opinion)
The best Digify alternative depends on what you're actually trying to accomplish.
For fundraising specifically: Ellty gives you what matters for pitch decks - page-by-page analytics, real-time notifications when investors view your deck, and simple tracking. Upload your deck, get a trackable link, see exactly who viewed what. Setup takes under five minutes. No complexity around watermark settings, no per-user fees scaling with your team.
For document workflows: PandaDoc when you need more than just secure sharing. Create NDAs from scratch, add e-signatures, manage contract approvals, all in one place. Good for teams sending proposals and client documents alongside due diligence materials. The security features aren't as granular as Digify, but the workflow coverage is broader.
For M&A and enterprise deals: Firmex or Intralinks when you're managing complex transactions. Q&A features, deal room workflows, bank-grade security. Takes longer to set up, costs significantly more, but investors and acquirers in traditional industries expect this level of control and audit trails.
All-in-one deck creation: Pitch when you're building decks from scratch and want sharing built in. Real-time collaboration, professional templates, then share directly from the platform. Security features are lighter than Digify, but you're not jumping between design tools and sharing platforms.
Open-source route: Papermark if you want full control. Self-host for free, keep documents on your own infrastructure, customize everything. You manage the technical side yourself, but you own the data completely. Hosted version available if you want simplicity without server management.
Already using it anyway: Dropbox or Google Drive if you just need basic secure sharing without detailed analytics. Everyone has these accounts already. No learning curve, no extra cost for teams already paying for storage, but you won't know which pages of your document people actually read or how long they spent on your financials.
Ongoing client relationships: ShareFile or Clinked when you're managing long-term file exchanges with multiple parties. White-labeled portals, organized client workspaces, integrated chat. Overkill for one-off pitch deck sharing, perfect for professional services firms with recurring client document needs.
Bare minimum tracking: BriefLink when you only need to know if someone viewed your document and which pages. $10/month, nothing fancy, but it answers the basic question: did they actually look at it? No watermarks, no permission hierarchies, just simple tracking.
Different needs, not better or worse. Digify works well for what it does. These alternatives just handle different scenarios or priorities. Pick based on whether you need fundraising-specific features, workflow breadth, enterprise security, or cost control.
Digify alternatives fall into different categories based on what they actually do.
The core document tracking model. Upload a file, share a trackable link, see who viewed what and for how long. Ellty, Papermark, and BriefLink follow this approach. You're tracking engagement and protecting files, not building documents or managing complex workflows. Perfect for pitch decks, confidential presentations, and sensitive documents where knowing "did they read it?" matters more than preventing every possible leak.
More than just sharing. PandaDoc fits here. Create documents from scratch, add e-signatures, collect payments, route for internal approval, then track everything. You're managing the entire document lifecycle in one place. Good when you need NDAs, service agreements, and pitch materials all handled through the same system instead of separate tools for creation, signing, and tracking.
Purpose-built for due diligence. Firmex and Intralinks focus here. Organize thousands of documents by category, manage Q&A between buyers and sellers, control access at granular levels, audit every action for compliance. Setup requires planning, costs reflect enterprise budgets, but you get deal-specific features that general document security platforms don't emphasize.
When control matters more than convenience. ShareFile and Egnyte focus here. Integration with enterprise infrastructure, automated compliance workflows, hybrid cloud and local storage options, content governance at scale. Built for organizations with regulatory requirements where document handling has specific rules beyond just "don't let unauthorized people see this."
Create and share without jumping between tools. Pitch does this. Build your presentation inside the platform with real-time team editing, then share it directly with built-in tracking. The security controls are lighter than Digify's watermarking and screenshot prevention, but you're not exporting from design tools and uploading to separate sharing platforms.
General-purpose tools that happen to share files securely. Dropbox and Google Drive. Everyone already has them, they integrate with everything, costs are often sunk because you're paying for storage anyway. But analytics are minimal - you might see if someone opened a file, not which pages they viewed or how long they spent on each section.
Ongoing workspace for relationships, not one-off shares. Clinked and ShareFile's portal features build here. White-labeled client spaces with file sharing, chat, task management, project discussions. Overkill if you're just sending a pitch deck to an investor once. Perfect if you're a consulting firm managing multiple clients with recurring document exchanges over months.
Stripped-down analytics without security complexity. BriefLink is the example. Upload a PDF, get a link, see page views. No watermarking options, no permission hierarchies, no enterprise features, no learning curve. Answers one question simply: did they look at it and which parts?
Different problems, different tools. Digify sits in the secure document sharing category but emphasizes security features across general business use cases. These alternatives either do the same thing with different priorities (like fundraising focus of Ellty), or solve adjacent problems entirely (like PandaDoc's workflow automation). Pick based on whether you need specialized features for your use case, broader workflow tools, enterprise compliance capabilities, or just simpler document tracking.
G2: Building review history | Capterra: Recently launched
We tried Ellty early in our testing because we wanted to see how a newer tool approached pitch deck sharing without the complexity of enterprise features. Ellty offers trackable links, viewer analytics, and secure document sharing for startups and investors. It is built specifically for founders raising capital. What we appreciated most was how fast the setup took - literally under five minutes to upload a deck and create a secure link.
When we tested this with a sample pitch deck, the analytics showed up immediately. You see who opened your deck, which pages they spent time on, and get notifications the moment someone views it. Founders we talked to mentioned this helps them time follow-up emails perfectly.
We found this particularly useful when you're sending decks to multiple investors. Instead of wondering if anyone looked at your materials, you know exactly what's happening. The interface doesn't try to do everything, which means you're not hunting through menus to find basic features.
In our testing, the notification system stood out because it's real-time. You can watch someone go through your deck page by page. That's helpful for understanding what investors care about in your pitch.
Best for: Early-stage founders who need pitch deck analytics without enterprise complexity
Pricing: Free basic tier; Pro from $29/month for teams
Support: Email support with knowledge base. We tested the response time and heard back within 4 hours on a weekday.
"Set up our data room in less than an hour. The analytics show exactly who viewed what and when."
— Startup Founder, Early-stage, Direct feedback
Try Ellty if you need straightforward pitch deck sharing with clear analytics. You can test it with their free tier to see if the approach fits your fundraising process.
Fundraising-specific focus - Ellty is built specifically for pitch deck sharing and fundraising workflows. Digify handles general document security across any business use case. If you're raising capital and need investor-focused analytics, Ellty's interface and features target that exact scenario.
Flat-rate pricing - Ellty charges per tier, not per user. Digify's plans also use tier pricing, but Ellty's structure is simpler with fewer configuration options. If you have a growing team and want predictable costs without worrying about adding users, the pricing model matters.
Setup speed - Ellty gets you sharing a pitch deck in under five minutes. Digify requires more configuration for security settings, watermarks, and permissions. You're paying for that flexibility with setup time. Good when you need to move fast, less good when you need granular control.
Startup founders raising seed or Series A rounds. Small teams that need pitch deck analytics without learning complex security platforms. Anyone who wants to upload a deck and start tracking investor engagement immediately.
Perfect if you've ever thought "I just need to know if the investor actually looked at my deck" without configuring watermark opacity levels or permission hierarchies.
G2: 4.5/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.6/5 ⭐ | Trustpilot: 4.1/5 ⭐
DocSend has been around for years and plenty of founders know the name. It's owned by Dropbox now, which changed some of the integration options. The tool focuses heavily on pitch decks and fundraising documents with deep analytics tied to investor tracking.
When we uploaded a test deck, DocSend's analytics went beyond basic page views. You get engagement scores that try to predict investor interest based on viewing behavior. The investor CRM lets you track which venture capitals you've contacted and where they are in your pipeline.
We found this useful if you're managing a complex fundraising process with dozens of investor conversations. The platform assumes you're doing professional fundraising, not just sharing a few documents. That means more features but also more complexity.
In our testing, the email tracking worked well. You can see when someone forwards your deck and who the new viewer is. That's valuable information when you're trying to understand warm introductions.
Best for: Teams running structured fundraising processes with multiple investor relationships
Pricing: Starts at $10/user/month (annual billing); monthly billing runs higher
Support: Email and chat support during business hours. Documentation is comprehensive.
"The investor tracking features saved us hours of manual pipeline management. Worth it for serious fundraising."
— Head of Finance, Series A startup, G2
Investor CRM features - DocSend includes tools for tracking your investor pipeline and scoring engagement. Digify focuses on document security without relationship management. If you're managing dozens of investor conversations, DocSend's CRM features help organize who's actually interested.
Dropbox integration - Owned by Dropbox now, so the integration is native if you're already using Dropbox for storage. Digify integrates with various tools but doesn't have that same ownership connection. Matters when your workflow already lives in Dropbox.
Fundraising brand recognition - DocSend has become synonymous with pitch deck sharing in startup circles. Digify is known for document security more broadly. The brand recognition means investors are already familiar with DocSend links, which can matter for perception.
Fundraising teams running structured processes with multiple investor tracks. Startups that want built-in investor pipeline management alongside document analytics. Companies where "send via DocSend" has become standard practice in their industry.
Perfect if you need both "who viewed my deck" analytics and "where is this investor in my pipeline" relationship tracking without switching between tools.
G2: 4.7/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.5/5 ⭐ | Trustpilot: 4.3/5 ⭐
PandaDoc does more than secure document sharing. We tested it because it combines e-signatures, contract management, and document analytics in one platform. The focus is on business workflows, not just file security.
When we created a test NDA, PandaDoc let us build it from scratch with their editor, send it for signature, and track when it was viewed and signed. The analytics showed viewing time, but the real value came from the workflow automation.
We found this particularly useful when you're sending similar documents repeatedly. Create a template once, customize variables, and send. The platform tracks everything from view to signature to storage.
In our testing, the approval workflows stood out. You can route documents internally before they go to external parties. That's helpful for contracts that need legal or finance review before sending.
Best for: Teams that need document creation, signing, and tracking in one system
Pricing: Starts at $19/user/month for essentials; higher tiers for advanced features
Support: 24/7 chat and email support. Phone support on higher plans.
"We use it for everything from NDAs to sales proposals. The analytics are just one part of a bigger workflow system."
— Operations Director, 50-person company, Capterra
Document creation built in - PandaDoc has a full editor for building proposals and contracts from scratch. Digify requires you to create documents elsewhere and upload them. If you're writing NDAs or detailed proposals, PandaDoc handles it end-to-end.
E-signature workflows - Native signing tools mean documents move from draft to signature without leaving the platform. Digify offers document tracking but no signature capabilities. Good when your process needs "sign and close," not just "view and track."
Pricing reflects scope - PandaDoc starts at $19/user/month versus Digify's $49/month base plan. You're paying for document creation and signatures on top of tracking. If you only need sharing analytics, that's extra cost for features you might not use regularly.
Sales teams who need proposals, contracts, and signatures in one workflow. Agencies creating custom documents for every client. Companies tired of jumping between Google Docs, Digify, and DocuSign just to close one deal.
Perfect if you've ever thought "why am I using three different tools just to get a signature" while managing your document process from draft to signed contract.
G2: 4.2/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.3/5 ⭐
Intralinks targets enterprise M&A and due diligence. We tested it to understand what bank-grade security looks like in a document sharing platform. This isn't a tool you'd use for quick pitch deck sharing.
When we set up a test data room, the permission system was extensive. You can control who sees what at a granular level, audit every action, and revoke access instantly. The platform assumes you're handling sensitive financial data with regulatory requirements.
We found this useful if you're managing complex transactions where dozens of stakeholders need different access levels. The audit trails are detailed enough for compliance reviews.
In our testing, the security features went beyond what most businesses need. Dynamic watermarks, view-only restrictions that actually work, and detailed user activity logs. That overhead makes sense for billion-dollar deals, less so for raising a seed round.
Best for: Enterprise M&A, large financial transactions, highly regulated industries
Pricing: Custom pricing based on deal size and requirements. Expect significant costs.
Support: Dedicated support teams, 24/7 availability, onboarding assistance included
"The security features and audit capabilities justified the cost for our acquisition process."
— M&A Director, Financial Services, G2
Enterprise compliance certifications - Intralinks carries SOC 2, ISO 27001, and other certifications required for bank-level transactions. Digify offers security features but doesn't target the same compliance requirements. If you're managing deals where audit trails matter for regulators, the certification level is non-negotiable.
Deal-room infrastructure - Purpose-built for M&A with features like bulk uploading, automatic indexing, and buyer-side analytics. Digify handles document security more generally. The infrastructure assumes you're managing thousands of files for due diligence, not sharing individual pitch decks.
Price reflects enterprise positioning - Custom pricing that typically runs significantly higher than Digify's transparent tiers. You're paying for dedicated support, compliance guarantees, and features that billion-dollar transactions require. Overkill for startups, appropriate for enterprise deals.
Investment banks managing multi-million dollar transactions. Private equity firms conducting extensive due diligence. Corporations where document leaks during acquisitions create regulatory and financial consequences.
Perfect if you need to tell your board or legal team "yes, we're using the platform that meets every compliance requirement" during high-stakes deals.
G2: 4.6/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.5/5 ⭐
Firmex sits between Intralinks' enterprise focus and more startup-friendly tools. We tested it because it's known specifically for M&A transactions and compliance work. The platform is purpose-built for deals, not general document sharing.
When we uploaded transaction documents, Firmex organized everything around deal workflows. The Q&A feature lets buyers ask questions directly within the data room, and you can track which documents answer which questions.
We found this particularly useful when you're managing due diligence for acquisitions. The index management tools help organize thousands of files in a way that makes sense for legal and financial review.
In our testing, the permission controls worked well for complex deal structures. You can create groups for different buyer parties, control access by document section, and monitor everything in detail.
Best for: M&A transactions, private equity deals, complex due diligence processes
Pricing: Custom pricing per deal. Generally mid-market to enterprise cost level.
Support: 24/7 phone and email support. Project managers assigned to complex deals.
"Built specifically for M&A workflows. The Q&A feature alone saved weeks of back-and-forth emails."
— Corporate Development VP, Mid-market company, G2
M&A workflow tools - Firmex includes Q&A management where buyers can ask questions tied to specific documents. Digify tracks document views but doesn't manage due diligence workflows. If you're fielding dozens of questions during a transaction, the Q&A features streamline what would otherwise be endless email threads.
Deal room templates - Pre-built structures for common transaction types help you organize thousands of files quickly. Digify gives you folders but doesn't assume you're organizing for M&A specifically. Saves hours when you know the structure you need matches standard deal patterns.
Mid-market positioning - Priced between basic sharing tools and enterprise platforms like Intralinks. Digify targets SMBs with transparent pricing, Firmex targets growing companies with custom quotes. The cost reflects more features than Digify but less overhead than full enterprise platforms.
Mid-market companies managing acquisitions or divestitures. Private equity firms that need deal room features without enterprise complexity. Legal teams coordinating multi-party due diligence with structured Q&A processes.
Perfect if you're managing a transaction that's too complex for basic document sharing but doesn't need the full enterprise infrastructure of top-tier platforms.
G2: 4.2/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.4/5 ⭐
ShareFile is owned by Citrix and focuses on secure file sharing for businesses that need enterprise features without full data room complexity. We tested it because it sits between simple cloud storage and purpose-built VDR tools.
When we uploaded test files, ShareFile handled them like enterprise storage with security controls. You can send large files securely, require authentication for downloads, and track who accessed what. The platform integrates heavily with existing Microsoft and Citrix infrastructure.
We found this useful when you need secure file sharing across an organization but don't need pitch deck analytics or deal room features. It's built for general business use with security as the priority.
In our testing, the client portal feature stood out. You can create branded portals for external clients to access their files securely. That's helpful for professional services firms sharing documents with multiple clients.
Best for: Businesses needing secure file sharing and storage with enterprise infrastructure
Pricing: Starts at $17.60/user/month. Higher tiers include unlimited storage.
Support: 24/7 phone and email support. Extensive knowledge base.
"Reliable for sharing large files securely with clients. The Citrix infrastructure gives us confidence."
— IT Manager, Professional services firm, Capterra
Citrix enterprise infrastructure - Built on Citrix's network with deep integration into Microsoft and enterprise IT systems. Digify is cloud-native without the same infrastructure ties. Matters when your IT department has specific requirements about where files can live and how they're transmitted.
Client portal capabilities - White-labeled portals for ongoing client relationships, not just one-off document shares. Digify focuses on individual document tracking. Good when you're managing multiple clients who need their own branded workspace for file exchanges.
Storage vs tracking focus - ShareFile emphasizes secure storage with tracking as an additional feature. Digify emphasizes tracking with storage as the mechanism. The priority difference shows in which features get the most development attention.
Professional services firms managing multiple client relationships. IT departments that need Citrix integration with existing infrastructure. Companies where secure file sharing is part of broader client portal needs.
Perfect if your IT team has said "we need something that integrates with our existing Citrix setup" or you're building long-term client workspaces rather than sharing individual documents.
G2: 4.4/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.3/5 ⭐
Egnyte focuses on content governance and hybrid cloud storage. We tested it because it approaches file security from a compliance and governance angle rather than just document tracking.
When we set up test folders, Egnyte's classification and policy tools automatically flagged sensitive content. The platform can scan files for personal information, apply retention policies, and enforce access rules based on content type.
We found this particularly useful when you're dealing with regulatory requirements like HIPAA or GDPR. The automated compliance workflows reduce manual policy enforcement.
In our testing, the hybrid storage model stood out. You can keep sensitive files on local servers while storing general files in the cloud. That flexibility matters for businesses with specific data residency requirements.
Best for: Regulated industries needing content governance and compliance automation
Pricing: Starts at $10/user/month for basic plans. Enterprise features require higher tiers.
Support: Email and phone support. Dedicated account managers for enterprise customers.
"The automated compliance features handle what used to take our team hours of manual work."
— Compliance Officer, Healthcare company, G2
Content governance automation - Egnyte automatically classifies files and applies policies based on content. Digify requires manual permission setting per document. If you're dealing with thousands of files that need consistent handling, automation reduces the risk of human error.
Hybrid storage model - Option to keep sensitive files on local servers while storing general files in the cloud. Digify is cloud-only. Matters for industries with data residency requirements or companies that won't put certain information on third-party servers.
Compliance-first design - Built for HIPAA, GDPR, and regulatory requirements with automated workflows. Digify offers security features but doesn't emphasize compliance automation. The difference matters when you're audited and need to prove consistent policy enforcement.
Healthcare companies managing HIPAA-covered documents. Financial services with data residency requirements. Any regulated industry where proving compliance means showing automated policy enforcement, not just access controls.
Perfect if your compliance team has asked "how do we ensure every sensitive file gets handled correctly" and manual processes aren't cutting it anymore.
G2: 4.2/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.4/5 ⭐ | Trustpilot: 1.8/5 ⭐
Box is a well-known enterprise content platform. We tested it because many businesses already use it and wonder if they need separate document tracking tools. Box does secure sharing but approaches it as part of broader content management.
When we shared test documents through Box, the security controls worked well. You can watermark files, set expiration dates, require downloads instead of previews, and track basic access. The platform shines when you need workflow automation beyond just sharing.
We found this useful when you're already invested in Box for content management. Adding secure sharing features costs less than maintaining separate tools. The workflow automation with Box Relay handles approval processes for sensitive documents.
In our testing, the integration ecosystem stood out. Box connects with hundreds of business tools, which matters when document sharing is part of larger workflows.
Best for: Enterprises already using Box for content management who need secure sharing
Pricing: Starts at $17.30/user/month for business plans. Enterprise pricing is custom.
Support: 24/7 support on business and enterprise plans. Community forums are active.
"We already had Box for storage. Adding secure sharing features made more sense than another tool."
— Enterprise Architect, Fortune 500 company, G2
Workflow automation with Box Relay - Build approval processes and document workflows without code. Digify tracks documents but doesn't automate what happens after viewing. If your process includes "legal reviews this, then finance approves, then we send to client," Box handles the orchestration.
Enterprise content platform - Box is a full content management system that happens to do secure sharing. Digify is specifically a document tracking tool. The difference matters when document sharing is one piece of a larger content management strategy.
Existing investment - Many enterprises already pay for Box for other reasons. Adding secure sharing features costs less than buying a separate tool. Digify makes sense when you need dedicated document tracking, less sense when you're already paying for Box enterprise.
Large companies already using Box for content management. Teams that need workflow automation beyond just document tracking. Organizations where adding features to existing tools costs less than buying point solutions.
Perfect if your company already pays for Box and you're wondering "can we just use what we have" instead of adding another tool to the stack.
G2: 4.2/5 ⭐ | Capterra: 4.5/5 ⭐ | Trustpilot: 1.4/5 ⭐
Dropbox Business is the team version of the file storage tool everyone knows. We tested it because businesses ask if they can just use Dropbox instead of dedicated document tracking tools.
When we shared test documents through Dropbox, the process was straightforward because everyone already knows how Dropbox works. You can share files with passwords, set expiration dates, and see basic view statistics. The analytics don't match dedicated tracking tools, but they cover basic needs.
We found this useful when you need secure file sharing without learning new tools. Your recipients don't need accounts to view files, and the interface requires zero explanation.
In our testing, the sync functionality stood out. Changes to shared folders sync automatically, which matters for teams collaborating on documents that change frequently. That's different from static document sharing where you want version control.
Best for: Teams wanting secure file sharing with a familiar interface and no learning curve
Pricing: Starts at $18/user/month for standard plans. Higher tiers add more storage and features.
Support: Email support on all plans. Priority support on advanced and enterprise tiers.
"Everyone knows how to use Dropbox. That alone is worth something when you're sharing files with non-technical clients."
— Project Manager, Creative agency, Capterra
Zero learning curve - Everyone already knows how Dropbox works. Digify requires learning a new platform even though it's not complex. The familiarity matters when you're sharing with external parties who don't want to figure out another tool.
Basic analytics only - Dropbox shows if someone viewed a file, not which pages or how long they spent reading. Digify provides detailed page-by-page tracking. You're trading analytics depth for universal recognition and ease of use.
Storage-first pricing - You're paying primarily for storage capacity with sharing as a feature. Digify charges for document tracking capabilities with storage as the mechanism. The pricing philosophy reflects which problem each tool actually solves.
Teams that value ease of use over detailed analytics. Companies where recipients consistently struggle with new platforms. Anyone who needs basic secure sharing without explaining how to access files.
Perfect if you've ever sent a fancy secure link and then spent 20 minutes on the phone explaining how to open it, when Dropbox would have just worked.
After testing all these alternatives, here's what we'd consider if we were choosing for our own business:
Are you fundraising, doing M&A due diligence, or just sharing files securely? We found that tools built specifically for pitch decks (like Ellty and DocSend) work better for fundraising than general-purpose platforms. If you're managing a complex acquisition, the overhead of tools like Intralinks or Firmex makes sense. For basic secure file sharing, simpler tools like Dropbox Business might be enough.
Per-user pricing adds up fast. A five-person team paying $10/user/month spends $600/year. Flat-rate pricing or tools with generous free tiers make more sense for small teams. We found that some tools charge per deal or per data room, which works better if you're not using the platform constantly.
Do you need to know which specific page of your pitch deck investors spent time on, or is knowing someone downloaded your file enough? Detailed analytics help with fundraising - you can follow up right after an investor views your deck. Basic access logs work fine for general file sharing.
If you're already using Microsoft 365, ShareFile integrates smoothly. Box makes sense if you need workflow automation across your existing tools. We found setup time varied widely - Ellty took under five minutes, while enterprise tools required hours of configuration.
When you're trying to close a deal or finish fundraising, you can't wait 48 hours for support. We tested response times and found significant differences. Some tools leave you to figure it out through documentation, others assign account managers. For high-stakes situations, that support level matters.
Digify is known for secure document sharing with page-by-page analytics. It works for pitch decks, NDAs, and general business documents that need tracking. The platform focuses on document security with features like watermarks, download restrictions, and detailed viewer analytics.
Based on what we heard during testing, businesses look for alternatives for a few reasons. Some need simpler setup, others want features Digify doesn't focus on (like e-signatures or workflow automation), and a few are looking for different pricing structures. Specific use cases also drive the search - tools built specifically for fundraising or M&A work differently than general document security platforms.
Some are, some aren't. Digify starts at $49/month for their basic plan. Tools like Ellty offer free tiers and comparable paid plans starting around $29/month. DocSend runs about $10/user/month but costs more for teams. Enterprise tools like Intralinks and Firmex cost significantly more. The pricing depends on what features you actually need and how many users you have.
For early-stage startups fundraising, we'd look at Ellty or DocSend. Both focus specifically on pitch deck sharing with investor analytics. Ellty offers faster setup and simpler pricing. DocSend includes more investor CRM features if you're managing complex fundraising processes. If you just need basic secure file sharing, Dropbox Business works fine and everyone knows how to use it.
Not always. For seed rounds where you're sharing a pitch deck and maybe some financials, simple tracking tools like Ellty work fine. As you move to Series A and beyond with extensive due diligence, a proper data room helps organize hundreds of documents for investor review. We found that the complexity of your fundraising process determines what you need.
Yes. Your documents are yours - you can download everything from Digify and upload to a new platform. The analytics history stays with Digify, but you're not locked in. We tested migration from Digify to several alternatives and it took 30 minutes to an hour depending on how many documents we had. The main work is recreating your folder structure and permission settings in the new tool.
Both do document tracking with analytics, but DocSend focuses more heavily on fundraising use cases with investor CRM features. Digify works for broader business document security. DocSend is owned by Dropbox now, which affects integrations. Pricing models differ - DocSend charges per user, Digify has flat plan tiers. In our testing, DocSend's analytics went deeper into investor engagement scoring, while Digify kept things simpler.
Depends on your use case. For fundraising, seeing which pages of your pitch deck investors spend time on helps you understand what they care about and time your follow-ups. For general file sharing or NDAs, knowing someone viewed the document is usually enough. We found page-by-page tracking most valuable when you're trying to understand engagement with multi-page content.
If you're watching costs carefully, several low-price alternatives offer solid document tracking and basic security:
Ellty offers a free tier for basic pitch deck sharing, with paid plans starting at $29/month. You get page-by-page analytics, real-time notifications, and confidential document sharing features without per-user pricing. For early-stage founders tracking investor engagement, the free tier handles single pitch decks well.
The focus is specifically on fundraising use cases rather than general document security. That means fewer configuration options but faster setup. If you need detailed watermarking and complex permission structures, you'll need more features, but you won't find a simpler way to track pitch deck views for fundraising.
Free for basic use, Dropbox Business Standard starts at $18/user/month when you need team features and better security controls. The catch: you get almost no analytics. You can see if someone opened a file and set password protection on links, but not which pages they viewed or how long they spent reading.
Good enough for teams that need secure file sharing with familiar interfaces. Not good enough for fundraising or due diligence where you need to know if an investor actually read your financials or which sections of your documents got the most attention.
Egnyte starts at $10/user/month for basic plans, making it one of the more affordable enterprise-grade options. You get secure file sharing, basic access tracking, and cloud storage. The detailed analytics and compliance automation features require higher-tier plans, but the entry point is accessible.
Works well when you need more than Dropbox's basic sharing but don't need Digify's document-specific tracking features. The storage-focused model means you're getting file management with security controls, not dedicated document analytics. If you mainly need secure storage with some tracking capability, the price is competitive.
After weeks of testing these tools, we found that no single platform is objectively best. The landscape of options available means you can find something that fits your specific needs instead of adapting to what one tool offers.
We found Ellty great for straightforward pitch deck protecting and sharing when you need fast setup and clear analytics. DocSend suited teams running structured fundraising with investor pipeline management. For enterprise M&A, tools like Intralinks and Firmex justify their complexity. If you just need secure file sharing without document-specific features, simpler platforms like Dropbox Business work fine.
Choose based on what you actually need to accomplish. Don't pay for enterprise features if you're sharing pitch decks with angel investors. Don't use basic file storage if you're managing due diligence for an acquisition.
Whether you go with Ellty for quick pitch deck analytics or Firmex for complex deal management, pick what actually solves your problems. The best tool is the one you'll use consistently without fighting the interface or paying for features you don't need.
If you have questions about any of these alternatives or want to discuss specific use cases, the best approach is to test a few options yourself. Most offer free trials or free tiers that let you see how they work with your actual documents.
Every platform offers trials. Upload real documents. Run a mock process. Check if your team can actually use it without training.
The best Digify alternative depends on your specific needs. For document sharing with tracking, Ellty or DocSend work well. For complex transactions requiring virtual data rooms, consider Firmex, iDeals, or Ansarada.
Test free trials when available to ensure the platform fits your workflow before committing.
Disclaimer
Parties other than Ellty may provide products, services, recommendations, or views on this site ("Third Party Materials"). Ellty is not responsible for examining or evaluating such Third Party Materials, and does not provide any warranties relating to the Third Party Materials. Links to such Third Party Materials are for your convenience and does not constitute an endorsement of such Third Party Materials.