Boston's angel scene wrote $340M across 280+ deals in 2025. Most checks were $50K-$150K from former founders who sold companies or made money at local tech giants. The city has strong angel networks but they're cliquish - you need warm intros from other founders. Cold pitching Boston angels on LinkedIn gets ignored 95% of the time.
David Cancel (Boston): Drift founder who exits for $1B+, now backs 50+ Boston startups at $25K-$100K per deal
Dharmesh Shah (Boston): HubSpot co-founder worth $500M+, writes $100K-$500K checks for technical founders
Rob Go (Boston): NextView partner who angel invests personally in pre-seed Boston companies
Brian Halligan (Boston): HubSpot co-founder who backs marketing and sales tech founders post-exit
Katie Rae (Cambridge): The Engine managing director, invests personally in MIT tough-tech spinouts
Elias Torres (Boston): Drift co-founder backing Latino founders and dev tools startups
Michael Skok (Boston): Underscore VC founder who angel invests in technical infrastructure plays
Semil Shah (SF with Boston deals): Writes $50K-$250K checks in Boston companies through warm intros
Naval Ravikant (SF with Boston investments): AngelList founder who occasionally backs Boston technical founders
Sizhao Yang (Boston): former Alibaba exec now backing ecommerce and marketplace companies
Dan Siroker (Boston area): Optimizely founder investing in A/B testing and experimentation platforms
Bill Warner (Boston): Avid Technology founder, one of Boston's original super angels since the 1990s
David Beisel (Boston): NextView co-founder who angel invests separately in consumer products
Jini Kim (Boston): Nuna co-founder backing healthcare and data infrastructure companies
Jeff Bussgang (Boston): Flybridge partner who maintains active personal angel portfolio
Boston angels wrote $340M across 280+ deals in 2025. Average check is $50K-$150K, smaller than SF angels who write $100K-$500K. The city has 400+ active angels but most invest through syndicates or follow institutional VCs. Solo angel rounds are rare - expect 8-15 angels in your round, not 1-2 whales.
Boston angels are former founders, tech executives from HubSpot/Wayfair/Toast, and Harvard/MIT professors who commercialized research. They prefer B2B software and avoid consumer plays unless you have exceptional traction. Most want to see product-market fit signals before investing, unlike SF angels who bet on teams pre-product.
The upside is Boston angels are deeply connected to local VCs. If Dharmesh Shah or David Cancel back you, institutional VCs take your next meeting seriously. The downside is Boston angels move slowly - expect 4-8 weeks from intro to wire, not the 1-2 week SF timeline. They want multiple conversations and reference checks before committing $50K.
Local presence helps but isn't required. Many Boston angels back companies nationally if they have sector expertise. But local angels can intro you to customers at Boston tech companies and make warm connections to institutional VCs faster.
Portfolio companies should align with your sector. Check AngelList or their LinkedIn to see what they've backed. If they only invest in B2B SaaS and you're building consumer hardware, don't waste time. Boston angels stay in their lanes more than generalist VCs.
Check sizes in Boston range from $25K-$250K per angel. Super angels like Dharmesh Shah and Brian Halligan write $100K-$500K checks but they're rare. Most Boston angels write $50K-$100K and expect 10-15 other angels in the round. Build a syndicate, don't expect one angel to fill your entire round.
Local network quality matters more than check size. Angels who can intro you to HubSpot, Wayfair, or Toast executives for pilot customers are worth more than passive angels writing $100K. Ask founders in their portfolio how helpful the angel was post-investment.
Communication with Boston angels is casual but selective. Use Ellty to share your deck with trackable links. You'll see which angels actually open your deck versus which ones ghost after the intro. Boston angels review decks faster than VCs - usually 48-72 hours - but most pass without explanation if not interested.
Follow-on capacity is limited. Most angels reserve $25K-$50K for follow-on but can't lead your Series A. They'll make warm intros to institutional VCs but expect to fill your A round with new investors. Angels who promise to "introduce you to everyone" often don't follow through. National funds write bigger checks, but only after you’ve nailed your investor outreach strategy and can clearly articulate SaaS-style metrics.
Research local deals by checking AngelList syndicates and Signal for Boston-based angels. Most successful Boston angels are on Twitter talking about their investments. Follow them for months before asking for intros - understand their investment thesis first.
Leverage local ecosystem through Boston TechBreakfast, Harvard Innovation Labs, and MIT Delta V demo days. Angels attend these events scouting for deals. Better than cold emails. Founder Collective and Underscore VC host founder dinners where angels network.
Build relationships first because Boston angels hate cold pitches. Get introduced by mutual portfolio founders or other angels they respect. If you don't have warm intros, participate in Boston tech communities for 3-6 months before fundraising. Comment on their tweets, attend their events, build familiarity.
Share your pitch deck through Ellty with unique tracking links for each angel. Boston angels typically respond within 72 hours if interested. If they haven't opened your deck in 5 days, they're not interested. Don't follow up more than once - Boston angels remember pushy founders negatively.
Attend local events like Boston New Technology meetups and MassChallenge finals where angels scout actively. David Cancel and Dharmesh Shah occasionally attend HubSpot INBOUND to meet founders. Angels are more accessible at industry events than formal pitch competitions.
Connect with portfolio founders from each angel's investments. Ask them directly how helpful the angel was and whether they'd take their money again. Some Boston angels ghost after investment. Others make valuable customer intros weekly. Portfolio founder references matter more than the angel's pitch to you.
Organize due diligence materials minimally because angels don't do formal diligence like VCs. Set up an Ellty data room with your deck, basic financials, and cap table. Most angels decide based on 2-3 conversations and gut feel, not comprehensive analysis. Having clean docs shows you're organized but don't over-prepare.
Understand local pace because Boston angels take 4-8 weeks from first meeting to wire transfer. They want 2-3 conversations, reference calls with your previous colleagues, and time to see early traction. Some angels say yes in first meetings then take 6 weeks to send money. Factor this into your runway planning.
Boston angels strongly prefer B2B software and avoid consumer plays. You'll struggle raising from Boston angels for DTC brands, consumer apps, or entertainment unless you have viral traction. They want recurring revenue models and enterprise customers, not download counts or social media followers.
Expect angels to pass without detailed feedback. Boston angels ghost more than VCs because they don't owe you their time. If you don't hear back in 7 days after sending your deck, they passed. Don't take it personally - most angels see 50+ deals monthly and invest in 2-3 yearly.
Lead with traction over vision. Boston angels want to see $10K-$50K MRR or strong user engagement before investing. They've watched too many idea-stage companies fail. Unlike SF angels who bet on teams and markets, Boston angels want proof you can execute. Show customer logos, revenue growth, or retention metrics in every conversation.
Drift founder who sold for $1B+ and now runs the most active personal angel portfolio in Boston - backs 50+ companies with fast decisions.
HubSpot co-founder worth $500M+ who writes the largest angel checks in Boston - super selective but incredibly valuable when he invests.
NextView partner who maintains active personal angel portfolio separate from fund investments - focuses on pre-seed Boston companies.
HubSpot co-founder who backs marketing and sales tech founders post-exit - extremely well connected to Boston institutional VCs.
The Engine managing director who invests personally in MIT tough-tech spinouts - deep technical expertise in hard science commercialization.
Drift co-founder who actively backs Latino founders and developer tools startups - one of few Boston angels focused on founder diversity.
Underscore VC founder who maintains personal angel portfolio in technical infrastructure - Stanford and MIT network depth.
SF-based angel who writes checks in Boston companies through warm intros - active Twitter presence and transparent investment thesis.
AngelList founder who occasionally backs Boston technical founders - extremely selective but massive value when he invests through network effects.
Former Alibaba exec now angel investing in ecommerce and marketplace companies - brings China market expertise to Boston portfolio.
Optimizely founder investing in A/B testing, experimentation, and data-driven product development platforms.
Avid Technology founder and one of Boston's original super angels since the 1990s - institutional knowledge of Boston tech ecosystem.
NextView co-founder who maintains personal angel portfolio in consumer products separate from fund investments.
Nuna co-founder backing healthcare and data infrastructure companies - deep healthcare system knowledge and regulatory expertise.
Flybridge partner who maintains active personal angel portfolio - one of most connected angels to Boston institutional VC community.
These 15 angels backed Boston startups in 2025-2026. Before you start reaching out, understand that David Cancel and Elias Torres move fast with quick decisions, while Dharmesh Shah and Naval Ravikant are extremely selective and invest in 5-10 companies yearly.
Upload your deck to Ellty and create a unique link for each angel. You'll see exactly which angels actually open your deck versus which ones ignore the intro. Boston angels review decks within 48-72 hours if interested. If they haven't opened your deck in 5 days, they passed - don't follow up repeatedly.
When angels ask for more information after your first conversation, share an Ellty data room with your deck, basic financials, and early customer traction metrics. Most angels won't ask for comprehensive diligence like VCs, but having organized materials shows you're ready to scale. You'll see which angels are actually reviewing your metrics versus just doing courtesy meetings.
Do I need to be based in Boston to raise from Boston angels?
No, but having Boston connections helps. Many Boston angels back companies nationally if sector expertise aligns. But local angels can make customer intros at Boston tech companies and warm connections to institutional VCs faster. If you're remote, explain why Boston angels make strategic sense for your business.
How do Boston angels compare to SF angels for check sizes?
Boston angels write $50K-$150K checks on average versus SF angels who write $100K-$500K. Boston has fewer super angels writing $500K+ checks. But Boston angels are better connected to local institutional VCs for Series A. SF has more capital but Boston has tighter networks - choose based on what matters more to you.
What's the typical timeline from intro to wire transfer?
4-8 weeks in Boston versus 1-2 weeks in SF. Boston angels want 2-3 conversations and reference checks before committing. Some angels say yes quickly but take 6 weeks to send money. Build this into your runway planning - don't assume you can close angel rounds in 2 weeks like SF founders.
Should I raise from angels or go straight to institutional VCs?
Raise from angels if you're pre-product or under $10K MRR. Institutional VCs rarely lead sub-$1M rounds in Boston. Angels can write $500K-$1M collectively and help you get to the metrics VCs need for Series A. If you already have $100K+ MRR and strong growth, go straight to institutional seed funds.
Do Boston angels expect equity or do they use SAFEs?
Most Boston angels use post-money SAFEs at $8-15M caps for pre-seed. Some use equity rounds with $10-20M valuations if you have traction. Angels rarely negotiate valuations hard unless your ask is unreasonable for your stage. SAFEs are standard - if angels insist on priced equity rounds pre-product, that's a red flag.
What makes Boston angels pass on deals?
Consumer products without strong traction, idea-stage companies without technical founders, unrealistic valuations above $20M pre-revenue, founders who can't explain their business clearly in 2 minutes, and companies that need $5M+ to reach product-market fit. Boston angels want capital efficiency and B2B models more than SF angels who tolerate consumer experimentation.