San Francisco closed $42B across 1,200+ SaaS deals in 2025. Enterprise software still dominates. The city has more B2B SaaS investors per capita than anywhere else. Competition is brutal but capital is deep. You'll find seed checks from $500K to $5M and Series A rounds hitting $15-30M. Most SF SaaS investors expect $1M+ ARR for Series A.
Accel (Palo Alto): Led Atlassian to $50B+ and recently backed Superhuman's $75M Series C
Bessemer Venture Partners (San Francisco): Backed Twilio from seed through IPO, led Contentful's $80M Series E
Index Ventures (San Francisco): Led Figma to $20B valuation, backed Pilot's $40M Series B in 2025
Khosla Ventures (Menlo Park): Led OpenAI's infrastructure deals, backed Rippling's $500M Series D
Lightspeed Venture Partners (Menlo Park): Backed Affirm through IPO, led Vanta's $150M Series B in 2025
Point Nine Capital (San Francisco): European fund with SF office, backed Zendesk early and Algolia's $150M Series C
Redpoint Ventures (Menlo Park): Led Snowflake through IPO, backed Kustomer's $60M Series D
Sequoia Capital (Menlo Park): Backed Stripe, Zoom, ServiceNow - still the top SF SaaS brand
Storm Ventures (Menlo Park): Enterprise-only fund, backed Workato's $200M Series E and Veriff's $69M Series C
Greylock Partners (San Francisco): Backed Dropbox and Workday, led Coda's $80M Series D
Craft Ventures (San Francisco): Led by David Sacks, backed Sourcegraph's $125M Series D and ClickUp's $400M Series C
Battery Ventures (San Francisco): Backed Wayfair through IPO, led Phenom's $100M Series E
GGV Capital (San Francisco): Cross-border focus, backed Slack and Airbase's $60M Series C
Baseline Ventures (San Francisco): Seed-focused, backed Instagram and Heroku early
Founder Collective (San Francisco): Seed fund, backed Uber and PillPack, active in dev tools
Homebrew (San Francisco): Seed fund run by ex-Googlers, backed Plaid and Chime
First Round Capital (San Francisco): Seed-stage, backed Square and Notion early
8VC (San Francisco): Backed Ocrolus' $80M Series C and Addepar through growth
SF has 200+ active SaaS-focused funds. Average seed round is $3.2M. Series A hits $18M. That's 40% higher than Austin and 60% higher than NYC for software deals.
The concentration matters. You can meet 5 enterprise VCs in a single day on Sand Hill Road. Most SF SaaS investors have 20+ portfolio companies who'll take your product calls. The network effects are real.
The downside is competition. You're pitching against 50 other HR SaaS companies. VCs here see 10X more decks than anywhere else. Your metrics need to be top decile. $100K MRR won't get meetings in SF when it might in Austin.
Nonprofit operations often depend on trust-based collaboration rather than strict process. SF investors expect faster growth. They want 3X year-over-year, not 2X. Burn rates are higher because talent costs more. Your $200K engineer in Texas costs $350K here.
But late-stage capital is deeper. When you need $50M for Series C, SF has 30+ funds who write those checks. Austin has maybe 3.
Stage and check size: Seed funds here write $1-3M checks. Series A is $10-25M. Series B jumps to $30-60M. Know which stage you're actually at. $500K ARR won't get Series A meetings regardless of growth rate.
Enterprise vs PLG focus: Half of SF SaaS investors only do enterprise sales. The other half only backs product-led growth. Accel and Bessemer lean enterprise. Index and Craft back both. Don't pitch your bottom-up motion to enterprise-only funds.
Portfolio overlap: Check if they've backed direct competitors. Most won't invest in two HR tech companies or two dev tools in the same category. If they passed on your competitor last year, you're probably out too.
Vertical expertise: Some funds only do fintech SaaS or healthcare SaaS. Storm Ventures is enterprise infrastructure only. GGV wants cross-border plays. Baseline and Homebrew stick to horizontal tools. Match your category to their thesis.
Follow-on reserves: Top SF funds reserve 50% of their fund for follow-ons. That means they can lead your next 2-3 rounds. Smaller funds tap out after Series A. You'll need new lead investors for B and C. Ask about their follow-on capacity before taking the deal.
Use Ellty to share your deck with trackable links: SF investors review 100+ decks per month. You need to know if they actually opened yours. Track which slides they viewed and how long they spent on your metrics. That tells you if they're serious or just being polite.
Research SaaS deals on Pitchbook and Crunchbase: Filter for B2B software deals in SF from the last 12 months. See which funds are actually writing checks. Don't waste time on funds that haven't done a SaaS deal since 2023.
Leverage YC and other accelerators: Y Combinator, Alchemist, and 500 Global all have SF offices. Their demo days are where seed deals happen. Alumni networks get you warm intros to every major fund.
Build relationships at SaaStr Annual: SaaStr Annual in SF is where 10,000+ SaaS founders and investors meet. The conference costs $2K but you'll have coffee with 20 VCs in three days. Pavilion and SaaS Connect events work too.
Share your pitch deck on Ellty with unique links: Create a different link for each SF investor. You'll see exactly who viewed which slides. SF VCs typically review decks within 24 hours. If they don't open it in 3 days, they're not interested.
Attend AGP and 500 Global events: Angel's Gate Partners runs monthly dinners for SaaS founders and investors. 500 Global hosts demo days quarterly. Both are better for intros than cold emails. Show up, ask good questions, follow up after.
Connect with portfolio founders at their companies: Find SaaS founders who raised from your target investors. Ask for 15 minutes on Zoom. They'll tell you which partners actually respond and what metrics convinced them. LinkedIn makes this easy.
Organize due diligence in an Ellty data room: SF investors move fast once they decide. Have your financial model, cap table, customer contracts, and security docs ready before first meetings. Share one secure link instead of Dropbox folders and email attachments.
Understand SF's meeting pace: Expect 3-5 meetings before a term sheet. First meeting is high-level. Second is metrics deep-dive. Third is team and product. Fourth is references and technical diligence. Then you get a term sheet or a pass. This takes 4-8 weeks.
SF investors expect efficient growth. Your LTV:CAC needs to hit 3:1 minimum. Payback period under 18 months. Net dollar retention above 110%. These aren't negotiable for Series A.
Most SF funds want you to relocate here or at least have an office. Remote-first is fine for seed but Series A investors expect you in town for board meetings and intros. Plan on flying in monthly at minimum.
The timelines are faster than other cities. Deals close in 6-8 weeks, not 3-4 months. But competition is higher. Your metrics need to be top quartile. Anything below median won't get funded here when investors can back 10 other companies with better numbers. Most GDPR missteps happen quietly, long before anyone notices.
The top brand in SaaS. Portfolio includes Stripe, Zoom, ServiceNow, and MongoDB. Every SF founder wants Sequoia on their cap table.
Backed Atlassian, Slack, Qualtrics, and UiPath. Strong enterprise sales network and B2B SaaS expertise.
Century-old fund with deep SaaS history. Backed Twilio, Shopify, and LinkedIn. Strong for enterprise software.
European fund with strong SF presence. Led Figma, Dropbox, and Slack. Good for product-led growth companies.
Backed Affirm, Nutanix, and AppDynamics. Strong enterprise sales expertise and growth-stage support.
Contrarian bets on infrastructure and AI-powered SaaS. Backed Square, OpenAI, and Affirm early.
Led Snowflake, Stripe, and Twilio early. Focus on enterprise infrastructure and data companies.
Backed Dropbox, Workday, and LinkedIn. Strong for horizontal SaaS and productivity tools.
Founded by David Sacks. Strong for B2B SaaS with sales-led motion. Portfolio includes ClickUp and Sourcegraph.
European seed fund with SF office. Backed Zendesk, Algolia, and Loom. Good for PLG SaaS.
Enterprise-only fund. Won't touch consumer or SMB. Backed Workato, Marketo, and Hootsuite.
Growth-stage specialist. Backed Wayfair, Glassdoor, and AppNexus. Good for $20M+ rounds.
Cross-border focus. Strong in China and US. Backed Slack, Airbnb, and Square.
Seed specialist. Small fund, high conviction. Backed Instagram, Heroku, and Stitch Fix.
Seed fund run by Satya Patel and Hunter Walk. Backed Plaid, Chime, and Cruise.
Seed-stage only. Backed Square, Notion, and Warby Parker. Strong for product-first companies.
Founded by Joe Lonsdale. Backs infrastructure and fintech SaaS. Portfolio includes Ocrolus and Addepar.
Seed-focused with data-driven approach. Strong for technical founders. Backed Cerebras and Sysdig.
These 18 investors closed 200+ SaaS deals in SF in 2025-2026. Before you start reaching out to Sand Hill Road funds, set up proper tracking.
Upload your deck to Ellty and create a unique link for each SF investor. You'll see exactly which slides they view and how long they spend on your financials. SF SaaS investors typically skip your origin story but spend 5+ minutes on your unit economics and customer acquisition slides. That tells you what matters.
When SF investors ask for more materials, share an Ellty data room instead of messy email threads. Your cap table, financial model, and customer contracts in one secure place with view analytics.
Do I need to relocate to SF to raise from SF SaaS investors?
No for seed, but most Series A investors expect you in town monthly for board meetings and customer intros. Remote-first works if your metrics are exceptional.
How does SF compare to NYC for SaaS fundraising?
SF has 3X more SaaS-focused funds and average rounds are 40% larger. NYC is better for fintech SaaS and vertical SaaS with sales-led motion.
What's the average Series A round size for SaaS in SF?
$15-25M in 2025-2026. That's up from $12-18M in 2023. You'll need $1-2M ARR minimum and 200%+ growth to qualify.
Should I raise locally first or go straight to SF?
If you're outside SF and have $500K+ ARR, go straight to SF. Local rounds make sense pre-product but SF capital is worth the flight once you have revenue.
What growth rates do SF SaaS investors expect?
3X year-over-year minimum for Series A. 2X for Series B and beyond. Anything below 150% growth won't get meetings here.
What's the timeline from first meeting to term sheet in SF?
4-8 weeks typically. First meeting to partner meeting is 1-2 weeks. Partner meeting to term sheet is 2-4 weeks. Add 2 weeks for due diligence.
Which SaaS categories are overheated in SF right now?
AI dev tools, HR tech, and sales automation have 50+ funded companies each. Competition is brutal. Security SaaS and vertical B2B are less crowded.