San Francisco deployed $8.4B into deep tech across 280+ deals in 2025. Most capital went to AI infrastructure, quantum computing, and synthetic biology. The city still dominates US deep tech funding but hardware startups face longer timelines than software. You'll need patience and deep pockets to raise here.
Lux Capital: Led Varda Space's $90M Series B for in-space manufacturing
DCVC: Backed Crusoe Energy at $350M valuation for compute infrastructure
The Engine: Invested in Commonwealth Fusion Systems' $1.8B Series B round
Khosla Ventures: Led Twelve's $200M Series C for carbon transformation
Founders Fund: Backed Anduril's $1.5B Series E for defense tech
Eclipse Ventures: Invested in Solugen's $357M Series C for bio-based chemicals
SOSV: Backed 40+ IndieBio companies in synthetic biology and materials
Playground Global: Led Atom Computing's $60M Series B for quantum systems
Data Collective: Invested in Impulse Space's $45M Series A for orbital logistics
Canaan Partners: Backed Zymergen's platform before pivot (honest inclusion)
Amplify Partners: Led Alloy Automation's Series A, expanding into process automation
Prelude Ventures: Invested in Aigen's $12M seed for agricultural robotics
At One Ventures: Backed LanzaTech's carbon capture and conversion platform
True Ventures: Early investor in Zipline's autonomous delivery systems
SciFi VC: Funded multiple Berkeley Lab spinouts in advanced materials
Pillar VC: Backed Standard Cognition's computer vision infrastructure
Root Ventures: Invested in Rebellyous Foods' plant-based production tech
Refactor Capital: Backed Varda and other space manufacturing companies
San Francisco raised more deep tech capital in 2025 than Boston, LA, and Austin combined. The ecosystem supports 12-24 month development cycles before revenue. Berkeley Lab, Stanford, and UCSF produce most US deep tech spinouts. You'll find specialists here who understand why your Series A is 18 months out.
SF deep tech investors expect capital intensity. Average seed round is $4-8M for hardware, $8-15M for biotech. That's 2-3x higher than software. Most funds here have follow-on reserves because they know deep tech needs $50M+ to reach scale.
The downside is competition. Every quantum computing, fusion, and synthetic biology company raises here. Investors see 500+ deep tech pitches yearly. Your technology needs a real moat. "We're 10x faster" won't close rounds without peer-reviewed proof or signed LOIs from Boeing or Genentech.
Local presence matters less than domain expertise in deep tech. Most SF deep tech VCs invest nationally but maintain strong Bay Area networks. Check if they've backed companies in your specific sub-sector. A quantum computing investor won't understand synthetic biology economics.
Portfolio companies should include at least three companies in your domain. Look for investments that reached manufacturing scale or clinical trials, not just seed rounds. Lux's Varda and DCVC's Crusoe show funds that understand long development timelines. Check if their portfolio companies are still operating or hit technical dead ends.
Check sizes vary wildly by sector. Quantum and fusion startups need $15-30M Series A rounds. Robotics and sensors can close $5-12M. Biotech Series A averages $25-40M in SF. Don't approach seed funds when you need $20M for your first commercial reactor. Share your deck via trackable links with Ellty to see which sections investors focus on before asking for a meeting.
Local network access is San Francisco's real advantage. The right investor connects you to Berkeley Lab researchers, NASA procurement, Genentech partnerships, or Apple's supply chain team. Eclipse has manufacturing relationships. DCVC knows DOE funding processes. Ask portfolio founders if their investors actually made introductions.
Follow-on capacity is critical for deep tech. You'll need 3-5 rounds before exit. Check if your seed investor reserves 2-3x for Series A and B. Funds under $150M usually can't follow-on past Series A in capital-intensive deep tech. Set up an Ellty data room early for your technical documentation and IP filings. Our professional services firms handle information flows that span clients, partners, and internal teams.
Research local deals through PitchBook filtering for "materials," "robotics," "quantum," "biotech," and "space." SF Business Times covers major deep tech rounds. Check which funds led the last five deals in your specific sector. Leading a round signals real conviction.
Leverage local ecosystem through Berkeley SkyDeck, Stanford StartX, UCSF Catalyst, and IndieBio for lab-to-market companies. Most SF deep tech investors scout these programs. Berkeley Lab's Cyclotron Road places fellows with investors. Join SEMI for semiconductor relationships or BayBio for life sciences.
Build relationships first at technical conferences where investors actually attend. SF investors go to APS March Meeting for physics, SynBioBeta for synthetic biology, and IEEE conferences for hardware. Skip generic startup events. Deep tech investors want to discuss your science, not your pitch.
Share your pitch deck through Ellty trackable links after conferences or warm introductions. SF deep tech investors typically take 2-4 weeks to review technical decks. You'll see which investors spend time on your data slides versus skimming. Include your Nature paper or patent filing in the same link.
Attend local events like SOSV's IndieBio demo days (twice yearly) and The Engine's showcase events. Berkeley's Big Ideas Contest winners often get investor meetings. UCSF's QB3 hosts monthly mixers where Canaan and Khosla partners actually show up. These aren't networking theater. Investor outreach succeeds when relevance outweighs volume.
Connect with portfolio founders through LinkedIn filtering for your sub-sector. Most SF deep tech founders share honest feedback about their investors. They'll tell you if their VC understands regulatory timelines or pushed for premature scaling. Ask about technical due diligence depth.
Organize due diligence in an Ellty data room with your scientific publications, patent applications, regulatory pathway analysis, and technical milestones. SF deep tech investors want to see your lab notebooks and failed experiments. Transparency about what didn't work builds credibility in technical diligence.
Understand local pace is slower for deep tech than software. First meeting to term sheet averages 4-7 months. Investors bring in technical advisors and conduct extensive diligence. Budget 6-9 months for your fundraising process. Don't start when you have four months of runway.
SF deep tech investors expect scientific rigor. Most partners have PhDs or worked at NASA, LBNL, or Genentech. Come with peer-reviewed publications, not just whitepapers. They'll dig into your claims during diligence. If your technology violates thermodynamics, don't waste anyone's time.
Capital is concentrated in specific sectors. Quantum computing, synthetic biology, and space manufacturing get funded easily. Advanced materials and agricultural robotics face more skepticism. Energy tech needs clear regulatory paths. Defense tech is back after a decade of hesitation post-Palantir.
Competition for talent is brutal. Every deep tech company competes with Google X, OpenAI, and Meta for the same Berkeley and Stanford PhDs. Investors want to see how you'll recruit when offering $150K versus $400K at big tech. Your technical founders need to be world-class or have existing team commitments.
One of the most technical funds in SF with deep science credentials and patience for 10+ year timelines.
Deep tech specialists who understand compute infrastructure and physical systems at scale.
MIT's deep tech fund with $600M under management focused on breakthrough science.
Vinod Khosla's fund backing audacious deep tech with huge TAMs and long timelines.
Peter Thiel's fund betting on defense, space, and breakthrough technologies everyone else calls impossible.
Manufacturing-focused fund with deep operator experience building physical products at scale.
Runs IndieBio, the world's largest biotech accelerator, with 40+ companies per year.
Hardware-focused fund built by former Android and Apple engineers who ship products.
One of the oldest VC firms with strong biotech track record and technical partners.
Infrastructure investors who've moved into industrial automation and process optimization.
Climate-focused fund investing in breakthrough technologies for decarbonization and adaptation.
Deep climate tech fund focused on industrial decarbonization and circular economy.
Early-stage generalists who've backed multiple successful robotics and hardware companies.
Berkeley-focused fund investing in university spinouts and breakthrough materials science.
Technical investors focused on applied AI and computer vision infrastructure.
Seed specialists backing technical founders building physical products and deep science.
Small but technical fund focused on space, defense, and frontier computing systems.
AI-first fund investing in breakthrough applications of machine learning to physical systems.
These 18 investors closed 200+ deep tech deals in San Francisco in 2025-2026. Before you start reaching out to SF funds, set up proper tracking for your technical materials.
Upload your deck to Ellty and create a unique link for each investor. You'll see exactly which slides they review and how long they spend on your technology validation or manufacturing roadmap. San Francisco deep tech investors typically spend 15-25 minutes on first deck review compared to 3-5 minutes for software deals.
When SF investors ask for technical documentation, share an Ellty data room instead of email attachments. Your peer-reviewed papers, patent applications, lab notebooks, and regulatory filings in one place with view analytics. You'll know if their technical advisor actually reviewed your supporting data.
Do I need to be in San Francisco to raise from SF deep tech investors?
No, but physical presence helps for lab access and technical diligence. Most SF deep tech investors fund companies nationwide if the technology is strong. They'll fly to your facility for diligence. Being remote works fine until Series B when you'll need Bay Area manufacturing or research partnerships.
How does SF deep tech compare to Boston for fundraising?
SF has more capital and larger check sizes. Boston has deeper biotech expertise and FDA regulatory experience. For quantum, space, and materials, stay in SF. For therapeutics and medical devices, Boston often makes more sense. Many companies raise from both.
What's the average seed round size for deep tech in SF?
$4-8M for hardware and robotics, $8-15M for biotech, $10-20M for fusion and quantum. That's 2-4x higher than software seeds. SF deep tech investors understand you need this capital for prototypes and technical validation before revenue.
Should I raise locally in SF or from East Coast deep tech funds?
Raise from whoever understands your technology best. Many SF companies have Boston investors (Flagship, The Engine) and vice versa. Geographic diversification helps for follow-on rounds. Don't optimize for location over domain expertise.
Do SF deep tech investors expect in-person meetings?
Yes for deep technical diligence. First meetings can be virtual but expect 2-3 in-person sessions before term sheets. They'll want to see your lab, meet your technical team, and review physical prototypes. Budget for investor visits during fundraising.
What industries get funded most in San Francisco deep tech?
AI infrastructure, quantum computing, synthetic biology, space systems, and defense tech lead in 2025-2026. Agricultural robotics and ocean tech see less capital. Energy storage and carbon removal are rebounding after tough 2023-2024. Check recent deals in your specific sector.
How long does deep tech due diligence take in SF?
4-7 months from first meeting to wire. Technical diligence alone takes 6-10 weeks. Investors bring in academic advisors, former NASA engineers, or domain experts. They'll verify your scientific claims thoroughly. Start fundraising when you have 12+ months runway.