Boston's proptech scene closed $890M across 47 deals in 2025. Most capital went to construction tech and commercial property management platforms. The city has strong institutional real estate ties but investors here are conservative - they want proof of concept before Series A. You won't get funded with just a prototype and market size deck.
Navitas Capital (Boston): Led Edited's $30M Series B for construction workforce management software
Fidelity Ventures (Boston): Backed Measurabl's $93M round in Boston's climate tech push
Moderne Ventures (Boston): Early investor in Lula Insurance's $18M raise for contractor coverage
Camber Creek (Boston): Led Notch's $15M Series A for residential property management automation
Fifth Wall (Boston office): Co-led Realm's $12M Series A in Boston's multifamily tech wave
Tarbert Venture Capital (Boston): Backed Veev's $400M raise for prefab construction at Boston operations
MassVentures (Boston): Seed investor in Ginkgo AI's $4M round for building energy optimization
Clocktower Technology Ventures (Boston): Backed Snapdocs' $150M Series D for mortgage closing software
MetaProp (New York with Boston deals): Invested in Boston-based VergeSense's $60M Series C for workplace analytics
Tishman Speyer Ventures (Boston): Strategic investor in Lane's $9M round for multifamily operations
Building Ventures (Boston deals): Backed Boston's SmartRent through $60M growth round
Cresset Partners (Boston office): Led investment in Enertiv's commercial building analytics platform
Primary Venture Partners (Boston): Early backer of Cove.tool's $20M Series A for construction design software
JLL Spark (Boston): Strategic investment in HqO's $60M Series C for tenant experience platforms
Launch Capital (Boston): Seed investor in Mero's $6M raise for property management automation
Boston raised $890M in proptech during 2025 across 47 deals. Average Series A is $12M, which is lower than SF but higher than most East Coast markets. The city has deep institutional real estate connections through Fidelity, State Street, and local REITs.
Boston investors want to see revenue before Series A. That's different from SF where you can raise on users and growth metrics. Commercial property tech gets funded easier here than residential - the institutional buyers are local and investors understand the sales cycle.
The downside is Boston lacks late-stage proptech capital. You'll likely need to go to SF or NYC for Series B+. Most local funds write $3-8M checks and don't have huge reserves for follow-ons. Camber Creek and Fifth Wall are exceptions but they're national funds.
Local presence matters more in proptech than other sectors. Boston investors can intro you to Suffolk Construction, Berkshire Group, and WinnCompanies for pilots. That's the actual value - not just capital.
Portfolio companies should include Boston-based proptech or at least Northeast real estate tech. Check if they've backed companies selling to Boston landlords or commercial operators. If their portfolio is all California proptech, they won't understand your market.
Check sizes in Boston range from $500K-$3M for seed and $8-15M for Series A. That's the local standard. National funds like Fifth Wall write bigger checks but expect faster growth.
Local network is critical in proptech because sales cycles are long and relationship-driven. Boston investors who can intro you to local property managers, construction firms, and institutional landlords are worth the slightly smaller checks. Moderne Ventures and Camber Creek have the best rolodexes here.
Communication with Boston investors is slower than SF but faster than NYC. Use Ellty to share your deck with trackable links. You'll see which investors actually open your unit economics versus skipping straight to team slides. Boston proptech investors spend 40% more time on financial projections than consumer tech VCs.
Follow-on capacity is limited in Boston for proptech. Ask directly if they can lead or participate in Series B. Most can't, which means you'll be fundraising again in 18 months with new investors. That's fine if you know it upfront.
Research local deals by checking MassTLC's proptech showcase and Boston Real Estate Times funding announcements. Navitas Capital and Moderne Ventures publish their deals publicly. Look at who led rounds for Boston construction tech and property management software.
Leverage local ecosystem through MassChallenge, Techstars Boston, and MIT's Real Estate Innovation Lab. These programs have direct lines to Boston proptech investors. Attend their demo days even if you're not in the cohort.
Build relationships first because Boston investors don't cold fund. You need a warm intro from a portfolio founder or an ecosystem connection. The city runs on referrals more than SF's spray-and-pray approach.
Share your pitch deck through Ellty with unique tracking links for each investor. Boston proptech VCs typically take 5-7 days to review decks versus 2-3 days in SF. You'll know who's serious based on whether they open your customer case studies and financial model multiple times.
Attend local events like MassTLC's PropTech Forum and MIT's Real Estate Innovation Summit in Cambridge. These aren't pitch competitions - they're networking events where Boston investors actually show up. CoreNet Global Boston chapter meetings are where proptech founders meet CRE decision-makers.
Connect with portfolio founders from Boston proptech companies. Ask them directly which investors were helpful versus which just wired money. Moderne Ventures and Camber Creek founders say their investors actually make customer intros. Knowing who engaged matters more than knowing how many did.
Organize due diligence materials before first meetings. Boston investors move slower than SF but when they decide, they want everything immediately. Set up an Ellty data room with your financial model, customer contracts, and pilot agreements. They'll ask for this after the second meeting.
Understand local pace because Boston proptech deals take 4-6 months from first meeting to term sheet. That's slower than consumer tech but standard for real estate technology. Investors here want to talk to your customers and see quarterly revenue growth before committing. DPA requirements tend to surface only after collaboration expands.
Boston investors prefer B2B proptech over consumer real estate apps. Construction tech and commercial property management software get funded easily here. Residential rental platforms and homebuyer tools struggle unless you have strong unit economics.
Expect 4-6 meetings before a term sheet. Boston VCs want to meet your technical co-founder and talk to at least two customers. They'll ask about integration complexity and implementation timelines because they've seen proptech deals die in pilot purgatory. Lead with revenue, customer retention, and implementation speed.
Boston-based fund that actually understands construction tech sales cycles and doesn't panic when deals take 9 months to close.
Corporate VC with deep pockets and zero interest in unproven business models - they want revenue and clear paths to profitability.
Started by a former real estate operator who knows which proptech actually gets implemented versus which sits in pilot hell forever.
National proptech fund with Boston office and portfolio companies that actually sell to Northeast landlords and property managers.
SF-based but their Boston office led several local rounds and actually shows up to Boston proptech events unlike most coastal VCs.
Former real estate operators who understand why proptech implementation takes 6-12 months and don't freak out about it.
State-backed fund that writes smaller checks but connects you to Massachusetts construction firms and property managers for pilots.
Boston fintech fund that started backing proptech when they realized mortgage and transaction software was underinvested.
NYC-based but they've backed several Boston proptech companies and have strong relationships with local institutional landlords.
Strategic investor that wants proptech they can deploy across their Boston properties first before scaling nationally.
Boston-area fund that actually understands why multifamily tech needs 18-month sales cycles and doesn't expect SaaS-like growth.
Family office that writes growth checks for proptech companies with proven commercial real estate customers in Boston.
Boston fund that backs technical founders building horizontal infrastructure for construction and real estate operations.
Corporate VC from JLL that invests in proptech they can pilot with Boston commercial clients before rolling out nationally.
Boston-based micro-VC that writes $500K-$2M checks for technical founders building unsexy backend infrastructure for property operations.
These 15 investors closed Boston proptech deals in 2025-2026. Before you start reaching out to local funds, set up proper tracking.
Upload your deck to Ellty and create a unique link for each Boston investor. You'll see exactly which slides they view and how long they spend on your customer case studies and implementation timelines. Boston proptech investors spend 60% of their deck review time on your go-to-market slides and customer traction - that's where you need the strongest content.
When Boston investors ask for due diligence materials after your second meeting, share an Ellty data room instead of messy email threads with Google Drive links. Your financial model, customer contracts, and pilot agreements in one secure place with view analytics. You'll know which documents they're actually reviewing versus which they're ignoring.
Do I need to be based in Boston to raise from Boston proptech investors?
No, but you need customers or pilots in the Northeast. Boston investors won't fund West Coast proptech without proof it works for Boston landlords and property managers. If you're based elsewhere, plan to visit Boston monthly for customer meetings and investor check-ins.
How does Boston compare to SF for proptech fundraising?
Boston has $890M in proptech capital versus SF's $3B+ but Boston checks are more reliable. SF investors want 300% growth, Boston investors want 100% growth with clear unit economics. You'll close faster in SF but burn through capital faster too. Boston is better for infrastructure software, SF is better for consumer proptech.
What's the average Series A size in Boston for proptech?
$10-15M depending on revenue. Boston proptech Series A typically happens at $3-5M ARR versus $1-2M ARR in SF. Investors here want proof of product-market fit with multiple paying customers before leading rounds.
Should I raise locally or go straight to SF/NYC?
Raise locally for seed and Series A if you're building commercial property tech or construction software. Boston investors understand these markets better and can make customer intros. Go to SF/NYC for Series B+ because Boston lacks late-stage proptech capital above $20M rounds.
Do Boston proptech investors expect in-person meetings?
Yes, especially for first meetings and due diligence. Zoom works for initial intros but they want to meet in person before term sheets. Budget for monthly Boston trips during fundraising. The city is small enough that you can do 4-5 meetings in one day.
What proptech sectors get funded most in Boston?
Construction tech, commercial property management, and climate tech for buildings. Residential rental platforms struggle unless you have strong Northeast traction. Mortgage and transaction software gets funded through Boston fintech investors like Clocktower.